Is it true that the old logo YY of the cab 20's are more solid and beta quality than the new logo YY of the cab 20's

can anyone compare
performance wise

Hmmm.....this is hard to compare because you must have 1 cab20 (the original one) in NEW condition and 1 cab20 (the newer one) in new condition as well. And then, you string them and compare them. However, getting a brand new old version of the cab20 is just hard......very hard.:(

If you use the old one (used racquets) to compare to the new racquet, it is just not fair and not very precise, and the data will not be correct.

Is it true that the old logo YY of the cab 20's are more solid and beta quality than the new logo YY of the cab 20's

can anyone compare
performance wise

Its an established fact that racquet covers in the past at of much better quality (tickness, material etc). So if you use quality of cover as a proxy variable for quality of racquet, then there should be some truth.

Then again, technology has moved on. So you might get the the "better" quality old YY can't match what technology has done to manufacturing medium quality new YY. But if you think about it, if YY produced now at the best possible quality, then it would be better than old YY (I think that is the only certain conclusion to draw).

JL

I, for one, beleive the older cab20 original feels more solid. This, of course, is my personal opinion only.

I, for one, beleive the older cab20 original feels more solid. This, of course, is my personal opinion only.

I would have to agree with Cheung, as my newer Cab20s don't feel as solid as my original Cab20, although maybe the weight difference has to do with it, since my original Cab20 is a UG4, whereas the new Cab20s are 2UG4. I'd have to say, though, that even though I have 2 new Cab20s, their balance points and weight feel very different from each other. Again, this is personal opinion so feel free to object :p