Yonex Armotec 300 and 500

[sheta]

Hi, everyone. I would like to ask what is the difference between Armotec 300 and 500? Except the price? Is that a big difference between? Please help, thank you!!;)

[ymerej]

Armortec 300, more flexible, no Gforce Ti, according to the Yonex chart, less of an offensive racket. Armortec 500 more stiff, has Gforce Ti and is a more offensive racket. I've used both and the AT500 wins hands down. Cheers

[manduki]

AT 300 is a flexible racket so it is speedy and a little whippy. I would consider this a low-end Yonex, in line with low MP's. The AT 500 however, is more head heavy, more stiff, and more expensive:p. AT 300 is not a bad racket if u like whippy fast rackets but it shouldn't be one you stick around with for the rest of your life if you want to improve in badminton.

[other]

at300 is meant to have less gforceti inserted into the head than at500, therefore it is not as head heavy. also the use of non-HM graphite may mean that it is slightly more flexible?

Id think of the at300 as a kinda of cab 20 but 3U and armortec head.....i know, which isn't therefore a cab 20:pbasically a good all around racquet that wont noticeable let you down in any particular area.

and i also like the colour scheme