AT 900 T vs. AT 700

[andrew chan]

Hi, I'm looking to buy a new racket, and was looking between the Armortec 900T and the AT 700.

I play a more power oriented game, because I'm young and like to smash xD
I would consider myself to be an intermediate player
The string i will string the rackets with is BG 85
I am also open to any other suggestions for rackets.
Also, I mostly play doubles
I currently have an AT 300 *old model* with BG 85 strings at 23 lbs.

I also can't find a place to demo the rackets, so thats why I'm asking, otherwise i would demo them.

Also, please post a logical reason for recommending a racket

also, i have read ants reviews, i just wanted more opinions from more people.

[Tsumaranai]

It's been discussed.

http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44291&highlight=900+700&page=2

[andrew chan]

y didnt it pop show when i used search engine...

[Smichz]

It has been discussed too many times already.Do a search,n u'll find more than what u're asking..

[Athelete1234]

If you use your wrist a lot, use the AT900T because if will benefit a style where power is acheived from a short, fast swing, where AT700 would be too slow. If you enjoy more powerbased play with more arm, then the AT700 will hit bombs. AT900T better for defense, AT700 is better for power (heavier and slower than the AT900T).

[andrew chan]

It has been discussed too many times already.Do a search,n u'll find more than what u're asking..

already used the search, if u can read that i did, thanks for the input athlete1234