Yonex Nanospeed 9900 Review

[Danstevens]

Is it just me or the string,i felt better while playing with its brother,NS9000X.Last time i strung my 9000X at 28lbs,BG85.Now i'm using a 24lbs 9900 65ti.Felt weird.No power.Maybe i should restring it before i can say anything about that.

BG-65Ti is much less powerful than BG-85.

[Smichz]

BG-65Ti is much less powerful than BG-85.

Yes,i am aware of that.I believe the tension matters as well.I prefer 65ti these days,since it has both power and durability.Next time i'll string it at higher tension,such as 27,28 to see its real face.

[Athelete1234]

yeah the arc10 is far more rigid so it takes alot longer to adjust to the arc10 whereas the ns9900 is alot easier to get use to and I think that it is a great racquet:D
Hah....the only racquet IMO that is really too stiff for me is probably NS9000X....probably because of the weird balance and the insane stiffness.

[jymbalaya]

yeah the arc10 is far more rigid so it takes alot longer to adjust to the arc10 whereas the ns9900 is alot easier to get use to and I think that it is a great racquet:D

:eek: i you think its less stiff than the ARC10?
wow.

[kc2626]

Hey...

Using Yonex MP66 now and use it for almost 3yrs. Thinking about switching to NS 9.9K. What do u think? You think it is a good idea.. Big investment.

YOu think i will have a hard time adjusting to new racket since got so much use to MP66??

[Athelete1234]

You'll find it's much stiffer but a bit speedier too. You might have to get used to the more rigid feel. You could try the NS6000 first, cause it's similar to the MP66.

[kc2626]

Haha.. got my new NS9.9K.. not try it out yet..

Tension with 66 string at 25lb. wanted to 26lb but the shop said they are worried since the racket said max 24lb..

Actually how high can the racket stand?? Or rather.. how high you seen others strung with this racket and still ok???
Just so i know to be safe

[jk1980]

I string 27 lbs for couple of months already. No issue. The tension stated at the racquet is extremely conservative. Pros go for high tension like 28-30+.

I would suggest you go to another shop to string if they didn't know that.
Probably inexperience stringer.

[bdoel10]

just got more obsessed of having this one after reading your great posts.
but still wonder to ask for recommendation to fit NS9900:
1.what kind of YY string (or other brand) to use for maximizing its speed?
2.what wud be the best string tension to play double (intensively offensive) ? manual or machine-stringing ?

tks

[ants]

just got more obsessed of having this one after reading your great posts.
but still wonder to ask for recommendation to fit NS9900:
1.what kind of YY string (or other brand) to use for maximizing its speed?
2.what wud be the best string tension to play double (intensively offensive) ? manual or machine-stringing ?

tks

Nanogy98, Bg66 or Bg80. Tension depending player... 26lbs onwards.

Manual or Machine? Depend on the stringer.. :)

[bdoel10]

Nanogy98, Bg66 or Bg80. Tension depending player... 26lbs onwards.

Manual or Machine? Depend on the stringer.. :)

well,tks anyway ants.
still dont get what u mean by 'depend on the stringer' ? pls xplain more

[Gold-]

is 9.9k stiffer than 9000x?
is 9.9k stiffer then at900p?
is 9.9k stiffer than at900t?
is 9.9k stiffer than at700?
has any one broke the 9.9k yet?
sry mind ans all the question?

[Athelete1234]

is 9.9k stiffer than 9000x? Noo
is 9.9k stiffer then at900p? Not sure
is 9.9k stiffer than at900t? Yes
is 9.9k stiffer than at700? Yes
has any one broke the 9.9k yet?
sry mind ans all the question?

NS9900 is pretty stiff...but it swings faster so it evens out.

[foo.tw]

Just got a new NS9900 2U with 27lbs BG80.
I feel the frame is pretty bouncy, the shaft feels not that stiff when I hit the string on my hand. I think it's not as stiff as how I feel when bending the shaft.
I think it has very good control among NS series.
The size of the sweetspot is close to NS9000-S and a bit smaller IMO.

Swing speed is faster than I thought. Can't figure out the reason from the frame shape or material.
The frame shape is similar to other AERO rackets but it swings faster.
Material should not have effect on swing speed.

Yonex seems to be apt to hide details.

[Sagar1232]

Re took some of the pics. All solid JPs.

Are the racquets for sale? Where did you buy it from? :confused:

[Sagar1232]

Re took some of the pics. All solid JPs.

These racquets for sale? cuz im interested..

[Oldhand]

These racquets for sale? cuz im interested..
You should be looking here:
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=153 :)

[norazlan]

Just got a new NS9900 2U with 27lbs BG80.
I feel the frame is pretty bouncy, the shaft feels not that stiff when I hit the string on my hand. I think it's not as stiff as how I feel when bending the shaft.
I think it has very good control among NS series.
The size of the sweetspot is close to NS9000-S and a bit smaller IMO.

Swing speed is faster than I thought. Can't figure out the reason from the frame shape or material.
The frame shape is similar to other AERO rackets but it swings faster.
Material should not have effect on swing speed.

Yonex seems to be apt to hide details.

yeah...:cool:...but i think the most advantage that i can look physically is the design of the frame which will give the maximum air resistance(i thought of when my first sight of the racquet :rolleyes: )....it's not like AT900 which in a box shaped frame, but in my opinion if AT900 in combine with NS9900 frame shape there will be more booom with whippp at the jumps right............:D:D

[Gold-]

is zelm power play 9990 stiffer or ns9900 stiffer?

[tientienwan]

I am using AT900P; I like power smashing and flat drive. Usually in doubles, I can play front and behind. I am planning buy the ARC10 but after have read the ARC10 and NS9900 article review. Now I am confusing which model should I buy it?

[grayson]

I am using AT900P; I like power smashing and flat drive. Usually in doubles, I can play front and behind. I am planning buy the ARC10 but after have read the ARC10 and NS9900 article review. Now I am confusing which model should I buy it?


I personal think that u suitable to use ARC 10.It heavier than NS9900.but stil lighter than At900p.my personal opinion is ARC10 is all rounder racket,so suitable for single and double.At900p is attacking racket.So suitable for single player but will feel slow in double when fast swing or defence.NS 9900 is the most faster swing Racket in YONEX.So it will suit for double too.Most of the Player who using Ti 10 will change to NS9900 soon.U can try to swing this 3 rackets then u will know it what the difference.

[LD rules!]

I personal think that u suitable to use ARC 10.It heavier than NS9900.but stil lighter than At900p.my personal opinion is ARC10 is all rounder racket,so suitable for single and double.At900p is attacking racket.So suitable for single player but will feel slow in double when fast swing or defence.NS 9900 is the most faster swing Racket in YONEX.So it will suit for double too.Most of the Player who using Ti 10 will change to NS9900 soon.U can try to swing this 3 rackets then u will know it what the difference.

the ns9900 is a great doulbles racquet especialy if u like playing at the front if u have great reactions then you can make the most of it's head light balance
I find it really good for singles and doulbles
As for arc 10 never played with it for a doulbles match once I swapped with a friend in a singles friendly game and found it was well weighted I think it is suitable for both types of game but I think I still prefer nanospeeds

[Firedrive]

I bought the Nanospeed 9900 2U JP version about 1 months ago and this racket is definetly the best racket which I have ever owned so far after playing previously with TI-10, Nanospeed 9000X (both 2U) & Sotx CP7000.

I had played with the ARC 10 once but I didn't really like it.

The major improvement of the Nanospeed 9900 towards the Nanospeed X is the better manoeuvrability for defensive shoots. Power is about the same imo.

I feel much better at the net now than before (setting up & finish for the kill). This is what other players told me.

But actually my best investment so far is my private coaching lesson with a former HKG national player. Quite expensive at HKD 400 per hour but definetly worth every cent!!! :D

[andyid02]

Hi Firedrive, then may i know how is it compared to Li Ning N90? Any comparison made? In additional, N90 is much much more expensive than NS9900.

[Firedrive]

Hi Firedrive, then may i know how is it compared to Li Ning N90? Any comparison made? In additional, N90 is much much more expensive than NS9900.

I have not tried the N90 personally but one of the chap in my club has this racket. I might ask him to let me swing a few times next week.

Although I am an offensive player and a hard smasher, I don't really fancy head heavy racket because the defensive factor is lacking. And at the end of the days, you can't only rely on a big smash, especially if you play against some advance players.

[andyid02]

Yup, agree, hmmm so NS9900 still more value for money :D thank you very much for your comments.

[Blitzzards]

I'm currently using a 3UG4 AS version NS9900 and I find I haven't really won a game with it in doubles play. I however find it VERY repulsive and whippy when you apply a fast wrist generated swing speed. The really interesting aspect about the racquet is that it attracts you to be fast on your feet and to grasp all the shots your opponent make, thus (to me) makes it kind of hard and disconcerting for doubles pairing/harmony but very good for dominating play in a singles game. It also reminds me of an old 2U Ti-10 (1st gen) I used to play with but only with more feel due to the stiffness and lighter since it's 3U. The smash capability is also very good since you're applying whip from your arm rather than depending on the head weight of the racquet, making it feel better to maneuver than an Armortec.

In fact it is almost TOO repulsive with the current NBG 95 (at 23lbs) string I have on it. I'm planning to restring it with BG 65 which I'm more used to. Hopefully this will give me a better balance between having a good soft feel and high repulsion and whip when needed. Hope I've contributed to the marketing and shelf life of this racquet (hehe, LOL).

[Firedrive]

I'm currently using a 3UG4 AS version NS9900 and I find I haven't really won a game with it in doubles play. I however find it VERY repulsive and whippy when you apply a fast wrist generated swing speed. The really interesting aspect about the racquet is that it attracts you to be fast on your feet and to grasp all the shots your opponent make, thus (to me) makes it kind of hard and disconcerting for doubles pairing/harmony but very good for dominating play in a singles game. It also reminds me of an old 2U Ti-10 (1st gen) I used to play with but only with more feel due to the stiffness and lighter since it's 3U. The smash capability is also very good since you're applying whip from your arm rather than depending on the head weight of the racquet, making it feel better to maneuver than an Armortec.

In fact it is almost TOO repulsive with the current NBG 95 (at 23lbs) string I have on it. I'm planning to restring it with BG 65 which I'm more used to. Hopefully this will give me a better balance between having a good soft feel and high repulsion and whip when needed. Hope I've contributed to the marketing and shelf life of this racquet (hehe, LOL).

If you have played with a 2U TI-10 like me before, you should actually get the 2 U version of the Nanospeed 9900 too. I tried the 3 U version but it's to light for me and remind me of the Armotec 800 DF (4U)

Even I have the Nanospeed 9900 strung at 25 lbs now (Ashway Micropower - my favourite now next to BG66), I still think that I can go for a higher tension to get a better controll.

[rotchanasak]

this is my 1st post.i am in thailand.
in here yonex nanospeed 9.9 is the same price for arc10.
i have use nono 7700 before 9900.and like "ant" said your game will change.
i agree with him.if for you guy who seek for head light balance rackets.
the nano speed 9900 is the suitable choice for you.but i also agree that the "price" is too high.for now with my ns9.9k for about 1 month my game is improve in all side ( drive,net shot,fast drop,or smash) compare with my old ns7.7k.not only my feeling but also from my friends on court.i am not worry in yy ns9.9k life on sale.because i buy only 1 rac per time.and old ns7.7k for 2 years (still work).so when the time has come the "next" rackets for me will help to improve my game and for sure it will mark for yonex.
and
"thank you very much for your great comment "ant" "
2 times you help me on my choice rackets
thank you for my ns7.7k and ns9.9k

[Blitzzards]

Hey guys, I've just come back from playing a 5 hour session with the UNSW badminton club. On first sight, it is actually impressive to see two or more people (mix of guys and girls) also using the 3U version of NS9900 which costs about AUD270 here. It seems to me the NS9900 is actually getting pretty popular these days.

Anyway, my last impression of my 3U NS9900 is that it really is pretty good for doubles play. I did quite a lot of angled hard smashes from the back court which were mostly winning shots, and my arm still feels pretty refreshed, meaning it didn't take me too much effort to generate such powerful shots. The lightness and frame shape of the racquet really helps with the generation of fast racquet movement for good smashing speeds ala the Armortecs (have owned an AT700LTD for a while). Net plays also came out almost ridiculously fast and accurate for me. The racquet is still strung with NBG95 at 23lbs, four knots stringing.

So at last I conclude that the 3U version of NS9900 is better for me for doubles play and I really would like to own a 2U version and perhaps string it with BG65 at 24lbs, 4 knots stringing for my singles use.

[LD rules!]

wow this thread has been neglected since the "z" came into town however I thought I would try to revive the thread with some weird stats from my own ns9900
I was really bored so I decided to measure the BP point and the weight of the racket
I decided to put it on the relible scales in my kitchen the racket has a overgrip (yonex supergrap) over the serial and cone code It is a 3UG3 racket
The racket weighed 79.3g (digital scales) I weighed it three times so that it was accurate and each time (apart from the first which showed 79.4g) it showed that weight however isn't 3U meant to be 85-89g ? Also even though it is very light it is still increadibly powerful
The BP measured was 281BP
Does anyone else have this with their rackets ?

[Smichz]

wow this thread has been neglected since the "z" came into town however I thought I would try to revive the thread with some weird stats from my own ns9900
I was really bored so I decided to measure the BP point and the weight of the racket
I decided to put it on the relible scales in my kitchen the racket has a overgrip (yonex supergrap) over the serial and cone code It is a 3UG3 racket
The racket weighed 79.3g (digital scales) I weighed it three times so that it was accurate and each time (apart from the first which showed 79.4g) it showed that weight however isn't 3U meant to be 85-89g ? Also even though it is very light it is still increadibly powerful
The BP measured was 281BP
Does anyone else have this with their rackets ?

A 3U racket shouldnt weight less than 80G.82-83 is the lowest point i believe.R u sure that there is nothing wrong with the digital scale?Both of my 3UG4 IP,JP 9900 weights 88,90.From all the rackets i have,the lighthest among all my 3U rackets is one of my old700.87G.All is unstrung.

[Smichz]

Back to the topic,this racket reminds me of the NS9000X.This is my 2nd 9900.JP one.Strung at 25,26 with BG85.I am personally a player of AT series,head heavy,i mainly use my arm to smash.While playing with this head light racket,if i'm smashing from the backcourt,i find it difficult to find the timing to really smash it hard.But with just some whips,this racket can hit the shuttles fast enough.Unlike AT,it's not heavy,but fast.

[LD rules!]

A 3U racket shouldnt weight less than 80G.82-83 is the lowest point i believe.R u sure that there is nothing wrong with the digital scale?Both of my 3UG4 IP,JP 9900 weights 88,90.From all the rackets i have,the lighthest among all my 3U rackets is one of my old700.87G.All is unstrung.

pretty sure there is nothing wrong with them
They are only one week old so there shouldn't be anything wrong with them also the racket is strung so that adds more weight racket is UK coded and legit

[jerby]

yonex 3U's are 85-90g
however, when a racket is strung and has an overgrip you shouldn't be surprised to get 100grams or something like that.

Have you checked the scales whether it's at zero when unloaded?

[LD rules!]

yonex 3U's are 85-90g
however, when a racket is strung and has an overgrip you shouldn't be surprised to get 100grams or something like that.

Have you checked the scales whether it's at zero when unloaded?

yeah scales read 0.0g before I had weighed the racket on the three seperate occasions I was quite suprised when that Reading came up

[cliffhu]

It's very likely that your scale isn't working right. Measuring three times and getting same readings only mean the scale is precise (or consistent performance in measuring) but not meaning it is accurate.

[gavinloh]

Initial Impression (1st session)

NS9900 3U with NBG95 @ 24lbs + Wilson Kontrol Grip

Switched to NS9900 from my 3 months old AT600. It feels great although I misfired during warm up. The reason? I swing too fast. With its head light, I can swing much faster now. As I primary played as defensive double, I getting to like this racket.

Then, when the game start, I can feel equivalent strength with my AT600 if not greater (not yet fully utilize its fastness on smash). I didn't feel less power despite its lightness. I think its extra stiffness in shaft helped.

I am getting closer to more shots in defensive mode than I have with AT600. However, I have to admit I need to improve my skills further to return the shots properly. This definitely gain my interest and attention to sharpen my skills. More after more sessions.

Looks

It is best looking for a black themed racket. It has orange metallic on it. I paired with Wilson Kontrol Grip (Black with Orange wording) to make it perfect. It is stringed with NBG95 Gold, not entirely match but I would say 80%. Overall, it looks sophisticated with all the new technology in it. I love it.

[minty31]

Just ordered 2 9900's with bg 80 at 28lbs. Ive been using the 9000x at the moment so i hope il be able to adjust ok. so excited :)

[RonRam]

I'm playing with NS9900 racket for about a week now and had 1 tournament on it.
All I can say this racket is awesome, with a proper use of wrist, the smashing power is perfect even you're at the back court.
This is my first yonex racket after RSL top rackets and really feel different.
All I can say, I love this sport :D

[firearc]

Would 2u or 3u be better? I heard 2u feels heavy like other 2u rackets but swings faster. But 3u has less power than 2u? If I get 2u, it might play slower equivalent to other yonex 2u. If I get 3u, maybe I won't have enough power as 2u. Also, does TW coded ns9900 play and feel the same as SP or JP? Same durability?

[silentheart]

Would 2u or 3u be better? I heard 2u feels heavy like other 2u rackets but swings faster. But 3u has less power than 2u? If I get 2u, it might play slower equivalent to other yonex 2u. If I get 3u, maybe I won't have enough power as 2u. Also, does TW coded ns9900 play and feel the same as SP or JP? Same durability?
Do a search on region code. The region code issue has been discussed many time before. I think you will get a good idea on which region code to buy.
Good luck

[armortec800df]

YONEX NanoSpeed 9900 Review

For the advance players, I would suggest to use a 2U specs instead as generally 2U rackets is more durable therefore your racket will probably last longer for the regular play with high tension string. Not that 3Us spec is not good, some may find 2Us too heavy for them to use. For those who is looking for an upgrade from NS9000 S/X to NS9900…this is the time to do so. Definitely you will not regret making the decision. As to quote this racket … “moves like a butterfly sting like a bee” as it strikes like a head heavy racket and easy on handling. Yet again Yonex and its R&D team has always made the best racket there is in Badminton. This time with the arrival of NS9900 your game won’t feel the same again!


Ants

Hi Ants, I'm currently using 3UG5 for AT800DF, AT900T and ArcSaber 10.
Should I get 2U or 3U if I were to get a NS9900?
Pls help to give your recommendaton.
Thanks.

[ants]

Hi Ants, I'm currently using 3UG5 for AT800DF, AT900T and ArcSaber 10.
Should I get 2U or 3U if I were to get a NS9900?
Pls help to give your recommendaton.
Thanks.

2U is the way to go for NS9900.

[bolibolie]

2U is the way to go for NS9900.
Why 2U? Is 2U heavier or lighter than 3U?

[dani737]

heavier ofc,
not recommending it for double player tho...

[armortec800df]

2U is the way to go for NS9900.

Ants, most of the time I play double. Should I take 2U?
Is it that 2UG5 for NS9900 give about the same feel as AT800DF and AT900T of 3UG5? Means head heavy?
I strung my AT rackets at main 24, cross 26 with BG66. Would u suggest I strung the same for NS9900? Or should I go 26 for main and cross?
Pls help to give your input.
Thanks...

[ants]

Personally 2U have a good head heavy feel compare to 3U. And feels more solid in control and power. Even the pros use 2U NS9900.

[dani737]

Ants, most of the time I play double. Should I take 2U?
Is it that 2UG5 for NS9900 give about the same feel as AT800DF and AT900T of 3UG5? Means head heavy?
I strung my AT rackets at main 24, cross 26 with BG66. Would u suggest I strung the same for NS9900? Or should I go 26 for main and cross?
Pls help to give your input.
Thanks...

ns9900 2ug5 will still give you headlight if you compare it to AT series cause the bp will stay the same, just the overall racquet weight will be heavier (cmiiw) .
if you are used to 24,26 just use that tension. if you want more control just use higher tension....
i strung my ns9900 with 29,31 bg66.

[armortec800df]

Ants & Dani, Thanks for the input.
I should be heading to my regular shop sometimes this week or next week.
Hope he has both 2U and 3U for me to try out the feel. :)

[Mark A]

Wow, this is one ugly racket - looks like a stick of Blackpool rock! Thing is I'll still probably end up buying one:o, and it might come to grow on me anyway (like the new BMW 5-Series).

Well, I did cave in and buy one, 3U US-code - can't get an NS9000X any more:mad:, so let's give this a whirl. It might end up in B&S after my first session, so keep an eye out...

I don't think it's ugly any more (probably mitigated by looking at the Arc-Z;)).

[Gold-]

does anybody know which shaft is longer? arc10 or ns9900?

[Ferrerkiko]

I think nanospeed 9900 is a stiff racket , good for doubles.

[y_o_n_e_x_m_a_n]

I think nanospeed 9900 is a stiff racket , good for doubles.

KKK and TBH currently using NS 9900 :cool:

[Blitzzards]

The 2U NS9900 is also one of the awesome technique-based racquets for singles play. By technique-based I meant a racquet which requires good technique to use and not just pure power play (although at higher standards even the higher end Armortecs won't be able to help much).

It almost feels like a worthy successor of the classical Ti-10 IMHO.

[y_o_n_e_x_m_a_n]

It almost feels like a worthy successor of the classical Ti-10 IMHO.

i like you man :D

[Blitzzards]

i like you man :D
Cool :cool:
Hi Five.

I would have been a NS9900 man if I had not fallen in love with the AT700 old colour :D

[y_o_n_e_x_m_a_n]

Cool :cool:
Hi Five.

I would have been a NS9900 man if I had not fallen in love with the AT700 old colour :D

AT 700 old colour...you are a strong man :D

AT = for strong man with strong arm swing

NS = for fast man with fast wrist swing

not everyone can fully master the heavy AT 700, just like the N90, only few can master it and fully utilize its' raw power :cool:

i predict your smash is around 297 KM / hour :p

[Blitzzards]

i predict your smash is around 297 KM / hour :p
No not that fast I must admit :o

But I must say this: I have heard many people comment on the NS9900 having no power or "being wimpy". I can generate smash power with the same intensity with either the AT700 old colour or the NS9900. The truth many people tend to forget or ignore when it comes to smashes or power play is that it really depends on technique and skills.

If I were to compare the smashing ability of the AT700 old colour vs the NS9900, what I can say is that the head heaviness of the AT700 old colour allows it to generate smashing swing easily but draws energy when defending. While the NS9900 is easier for defensive maneuvers, it can also be pushed to generate insane smashing power but you will tend to have put in more strength into the racquet to generate such power. Ultimately, both racquets to me turn out to suit my play style comfortable; it is just the "mood" which is different when I use either one.

By the way for a player to be strong all around, be it for clears or smashes, both the wrist and arm have to be of adequate strength. Footwork also helps a lot on generating power.

[y_o_n_e_x_m_a_n]

By the way for a player to be strong all around, be it for clears or smashes, both the wrist and arm have to be of adequate strength. Footwork also helps a lot on generating power.

agreed, currently i am copying TBH smashing technique :D

but i can't jump so high :p

i am working on my body turn at the moment :cool:

current smash speed = 257 KM / hour

current drop speed = 127 KM / hour

muahahaha just joking :D

[Babyface]

Had a chance to test both of these rackets today (ns9900 and the at700 old colour.)
Both give great response in smashing and feel. The ns is definately lighter, which allowed better defense.
Apart form that, both are good rackets smashing at similar pace. Technique is key ;)

[Gold-]

ti-10 yellow,ti-10purple and ns9900 which one is more head lighter, stiffer and more durable???

[jymbalaya]

well, i am pretty sure that the NS9900 feels the lightest. the Ti-10 may be stiffer, but i haven't played with a Third gen. durable is probably the NS9900.

[dinitial]

For me the NS9900 feels like the stiffest of the three. And I think the NS9900 is the most durable, because we have already broken several Ti-10 yellow en purple ones. The Ti-10 purple the (head)lightest.

[Gold-]

is there any more players which can agree that the ns9900 is stiffer than the ti-10 (yellow and purple)

[Gold-]

.................

[dani737]

imo, ti-10 3rd and ns9900 have same stiffness,
ns9900 more headlight that ti-10 3rd.

currently my main racket is ns9900.
last month my main racket was ti-10.

[y_o_n_e_x_m_a_n]

currently my main racket is ns9900.
last month my main racket was ti-10.

so this mean next month is back to Ti 10? :D

or something with a letter "Z" ? :p

[Ferrerkiko]

Hi bros: compare Yonex Nanospeed 9900, Yonex z -slash and Yonex armotec 700 old color ... which one is stiffest of all ?

[demolidor]

Hi bros: compare Yonex Nanospeed 9900, Yonex z -slash and Yonex armotec 700 old color ... which one is stiffest of all ?

9900>700>Z (which you could have found out by reading the threads :p)

[Ferrerkiko]

So bro: u mean Nanospeed 9900 is the stiffest of all ?

[MetalOrange]

Ferrerkiko,

looks like it in terms of stiffness, ns9900 (head light but leaner), at 700 (heavy heavy and meatier) and z (even balanced for static weight and slightly heavy heavy for swing weight; with all the fats trimmed).

MetalOrange

[shihman]

i have played with TI-10(purple), AT700, NS9000S/X (both) and now NS9900. for me the stiffest is NS9000X but durability is definitely NS9900 (don't know about the Z).

[psbad]

NS9900 is the stiffest. The next one in the NS series is probably the NS8000. The NS9000 (X or S) isn't actually too bad purely because of greater mass on the head.

Most of the top-end Yonex rackets have stiff shafts. It's just differences in balance that makes people feel otherwise. Based on this, the Ti-10s (2nd or 3rd gen) are definitely not as stiff as the nanospeeds.

[keith.roche]

How can you guys adapt to different rackets every month ? lol
I have tried, and I failed miserably ... and I always come back to my trustee Ashaway Palladium XT600, head heavy racket...
And I have tested out lots of new Yonex rackets, and only thing I liked was the AT900P, and the AT700....
I tried the NS9900.... feels too light ... :( I have to put in MORE effort, for all shots..

[shihman]

How can you guys adapt to different rackets every month ? lol
I have tried, and I failed miserably ... and I always come back to my trustee Ashaway Palladium XT600, head heavy racket...
And I have tested out lots of new Yonex rackets, and only thing I liked was the AT900P, and the AT700....
I tried the NS9900.... feels too light ... :( I have to put in MORE effort, for all shots..

haha that's a good one. the rackets i have mentioned are not all the rackets i have tried/owned. all i can say is i have been playing badminton for a long time so this isn't really that bad. however it does takes me couple months to get completely used to a new racket. but if you are making the transition within the same series or balance types, that should make it easier.

good thing that you are consistent in your racket selection in AT900P and AT700. both are attacking head heavy racket. If you do want to try another racket, i think the ARC 10 is a good choice for you as well.

but 1 thing i have to disagree with you is that you DO NOT have to put in more effort to play your shots with NS9900. as matter of fact because of the lightness, NS9900 helps me to generate more power and faster swings with less effort. then again, not every racket is suited for everyone. different racket/series is designed to fit certain playing style. i think NS9900 is more suited for double players with good net plays, fast wrist action, and good deception in you back court drops/attacking lobs/smashes. it also does generate a surprisingly powerful smash once you get the timing down.

[Random-person1]

NS9900 is indeed a very stiff racquet that will take some adjusting for most people.

[Ferrerkiko]

Hi bros : let's say compared these 4 rackets of spec stiffness and headheavy:

1) Armotec 700

2) Nanospeed 8000

3) Nanospeed 9000 Type X

4) Nanospeed 9900

5) Ti -10

Which one to choose from for the most stiffness & most heavyhead?

[shihman]

i would say the stiffest is either NS9900 or NS9000X. the head heavy racket would be NS9000X or the AT700 (3U, 4U is much lighter).
as you can see the NS9000X have both the stiffness and the heaviness. but i don't think that's a good combination.

[demolidor]

Hi bros : let's say compared these 4 rackets of spec stiffness and headheavy:

1) Armotec 700

2) Nanospeed 8000

3) Nanospeed 9000 Type X

4) Nanospeed 9900

5) Ti -10

Which one to choose from for the most stiffness & most heavyhead?

Number 1 :D (new colour) Why don't you start your own thread in this section: http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=155

[spoonsport97]

Hi there,

Where can I find Nanospeed 9900 2U in Malaysia? It seems very hard to find. All I found is 3U.

[ants]

There is no 2U in Malaysia.

[Ferrerkiko]

I think can get it in China

[MetalOrange]

Hi there,

Where can I find Nanospeed 9900 2U in Malaysia? It seems very hard to find. All I found is 3U.

oddly enough but there's not too many ns 9900 2Us around these days (except japan), they'd (stores) stock-in 100 pieces and there are only 2-5 max 2Us, reason being, they know their ''most usual'' walk-in clients prefer 3U. however, if you can wait for the next batch, your friendly store may be able to reserve you one.

[KLFreedom]

Spoonsports97

Get it from shuttle-house.com

[Brooks]

Nice and very easy to run around with, stiff enough and has a large sweetspot. Real quick too. A great racquet, up there among the best ever produced.

All the best,
Brooks

[LD rules!]

it is a fantastic racket there is no way anyone can say otherwise in my opinion
I bought a AT900T again (4uG4) because I thought that it would be a better racket for singles but at the moment it is sitting in my racket bag because it can't compete with my ns9900
I will get my AT900T re strung as I think that's the problem (it's still factory strung my AT900T)

[Random-person1]

it is a fantastic racket there is no way anyone can say otherwise in my opinion
I bought a AT900T again (4uG4) because I thought that it would be a better racket for singles but at the moment it is sitting in my racket bag because it can't compete with my ns9900
I will get my AT900T re strung as I think that's the problem (it's still factory strung my AT900T)

Wow! Isn't playing singles with the NS9900 tiring?

[LD rules!]

Wow! Isn't playing singles with the NS9900 tiring?

no it's fantastic !!!!!!! My smashes are like I am using a AT700 and my defence is like I am using a very head light racket the speed of retrieving the shuttle is fantastic even shots the other side of the court are reachable it is like there is a magnetic atraction between the shuttle and the ns9900 when defending and when attacking it is just soooo powerfull especially for a head light / even balanced racket

[T-maker]

been playing badminton on/off since school days and at times during working days.

been using only Yonex ,and i lost count the numbers of raquets i bought and 'lost'.. lost in a way of moving and then didn't bring them along.lost by the way of lending to friends and then they in turn lost them.

so... back to topic,started again a few years back and this time it's regular .and i got Amortec 900 Power. feels 'good'.. lol..

and then NanoSpeed came out,so got the 9900... and 'pity' Amortec..been in the bag all along ... only took it out when the string on the Nano broke..lol..

yea, it's a good raquet...one more thing... the tension of the string is allowed at max 24 lbs only ?

cos, i prefer 28 lbs, but the guys can't promise me if anything happens to the racquet should it goes...

[Colonel]

yea, it's a good raquet...one more thing... the tension of the string is allowed at max 24 lbs only ?

cos, i prefer 28 lbs, but the guys can't promise me if anything happens to the racquet should it goes...

Not true, I got my NanoSpeed 9900 2U at 31/32 the first stringing for that break in effect then restrung at 29/30.

Yonex are always conservative but they certainly don't lag behind RSL by that much.

Enjoy

[Mark A]

Finally got to take my 9900 for a spin today, so here are my thoughts...

NS9900 3UG4, US code
String: Ash Zymax 62, 24 x 26 lbs (over-calibrated manual)
Balance as used ~285
MD only, plastic Mavis 300 shuttles


Impressions

I was told (although "warned" might be more accurate) that this was an extremely head-light racket, but I would disagree - mine was balanced perfectly for all-round doubles. The frame cuts the air beautifully with a nice, high-pitched swish. I myself denegrated the colour scheme but it looks so much better to the naked eye (my monitor makes everything look like it's just come from the land of Oz).


Game time

It took me less than one game to fall in love with this thing...


Power

Excellent. I was smashing harder than ever before, real howitzers, and this isn't a particularly demanding racket either. Clears and drives, forehand and backhand, ALWAYS reached the back of the court (and even went long a few times) no matter where I hit them from. Lifting, though, was the highlight - I got huge height and depth on EVERY occasion, giving me lots of time to recover position. Given the stiffness I was expecting the NS9900 to be unforgiving in the extreme, so this was a nice surprise.


Defence

Outstanding. Probably the easiest defensive Yonex racket I have ever tried. There are some serious smashers in our group, and when they get hold of one it usually gets a weak lift first time. With the NS9900, though, by the time I'd thought "uh oh", the shuttle was already screaming off in a drive or lift to the baseline; there is almost telepathic defence on offer from this racket. The head is so mobile that you can play backhand defense with almost any smash, and the few times I had to take it on the forehand I was not disappointed. Not to impugn the other aspects of the 9900, but defence was definitely the strongest branch for my money.


Control

Excellent. The accuracy of my lifts, drives and net shots was up over anything else I have tried, with depth in particular being very precise. Even serves were more controlled, with the feel of the racket helping me a great deal. I was delighted at being able to get such a huge cross angle from defensive shots, and once I was dialled into the racket I was consistently lifting and clearing to within six inches of the baseline. The balance combined with the head speed made it very easy to throw deceptive shots in as well, as they could be delayed for a really long time before committing.


Stability

Excellent. This X-Fullerene seems to have made a real difference - the hoop is a real tank:D. It was very difficult to make it wobble no matter what I did; nice to have a Yonex that doesn't carry an air of delicacy about it, especially given the ease with which it swings through. I would think nothing of stringing this past 30 lbs if the mood took me.


Conclusions

This is one of the finest YY rackets ever made, and a worthy successor to the 9000X. Its attributes became apparent during the first few minutes of knocking up, and I must confess I was supposed to be trying the Arc-Z tonight but I barely put the 9900 down. It does EVERYTHING a doubles racket should do.

Pros - power, placement, DEFENCE, feel... etc etc.
Cons - Er... I honestly can't think of any. Perhaps the price; I got mine as an ex-review racket.

If I manage to get the Z-Slash out of my bag I'll put a review up next Weds, but it's going to have to be a real earth-shatterer to get the 9900 out of my hand - this is now my go-to racket.

[Porky]

Can i ask those NS9900 users, how's this racquet performs for netplays, dropshots? Easy to maneuvre? :D

[ants]

Can i ask those NS9900 users, how's this racquet performs for netplays, dropshots? Easy to maneuvre? :D

Very easy. One of the best front court rackets. Sensitive feel and not too over powering.

[rotchanasak]

Like you said "ANTS".Compare with NS7700 my old racket.
the NS9900 often do more tight spin net shot.
Easy to lift and half court drive.
But beware for hard lift at the front court the bird will fly out the line.
For head light racket lover , THE NS9900 is your upgrade racket for sure.

[Porky]

So my next Qns would be, where in Sg izit more worthwhile to buy NS9900? Compared to JB's Honly retail price, which is cheaper? Looking at so many reviews, i'm sure i'm gonna get 1 soon...hehe:p

[Porky]

Btw, does it matters which code the NS9900 comes from? All performs juz as good and quality no issue?

[rotchanasak]

Sorry guy! I am in THAILAND.
And here the ns9900 only come with TH code and only 3u.
In THAILAND you can buy 4200-4600 bath.
And quality is diferrent by dealer.
You should try by yourself before buying it.
Good luck.

[Pemuda]

Ladies,

Just received my performance bonus last week. I am a happy man indeed. With the RM, I got myself a Nanospeed 9900 through a colleague when he went to JB. Got it for RM623. I must say this is the first time, I bought such an expensive racket. Took it out yesterday for a test drive and my heart almost sank when my doubles partner's racket clashed with mine. I must say I was a little distracted as I was thinking about the RM623 paid and we lost the game :D.

With a new top of the line racket, I need a pair of decent badminton shoes. Am looking at Victor.

[danielwong]

Ladies,

Just received my performance bonus last week. I am a happy man indeed. With the RM, I got myself a Nanospeed 9900 through a colleague when he went to JB. Got it for RM623. I must say this is the first time, I bought such an expensive racket. Took it out yesterday for a test drive and my heart almost sank when my doubles partner's racket clashed with mine. I must say I was a little distracted as I was thinking about the RM623 paid and we lost the game :D.

With a new top of the line racket, I need a pair of decent badminton shoes. Am looking at Victor.


wow....you finally made a bold move ar...:D:D
i thought you only buy less than RM 250 racquet...

[Pemuda]

wow....you finally made a bold move ar...:D:D
i thought you only buy less than RM 250 racquet...

When my lady boss called me in to the office last Monday, I thought I am going to get my butt kicked or chewed. But when she gave me a cheque for RMxx,xxx.xx , I decided why not!

The thing about buying something expensive, when I was playing with my mid ranged Apacs, very seldom my racket will clashed with my partner. But yesterday my racket clashed with my partner's twice! And the funny part, we were leading like 7-4 or something till I got distracted after the clash and we ended up losing.

RM623 for Yonex NS9900, pretty decent deal, right?

As for my little bonus, I got get a decent Victor shoes and a 42" LCD tv for my apartment (love pad actually) and keep the balance.

[Pemuda]

I just checked my NS9900 and there are some paint chip at the racket frame due to me clashing with my partner's racket last night. Celaka! Later on, I will go to the shop to get some marker pen and colour over it.

Thats the problem when you buy expensive rackets. :o

I will put my NS9900 pics up soon, by this week. I am not on leave today la, though my lady boss likes me a lot, I still need to get stuff done on time for her. :p

[danielwong]

When my lady boss called me in to the office last Monday, I thought I am going to get my butt kicked or chewed. But when she gave me a cheque for RMxx,xxx.xx , I decided why not!

The thing about buying something expensive, when I was playing with my mid ranged Apacs, very seldom my racket will clashed with my partner. But yesterday my racket clashed with my partner's twice! And the funny part, we were leading like 7-4 or something till I got distracted after the clash and we ended up losing.

RM623 for Yonex NS9900, pretty decent deal, right?

As for my little bonus, I got get a decent Victor shoes and a 42" LCD tv for my apartment (love pad actually) and keep the balance.


hm....:cool::cool: why typical MAS players excuse you are using? :D:D
a lost is a lost :D:D
anyway RM623 is a good deal....
FYI, just received my Ti10 2nd Gen from China yesterday
my Ti10 family expanded

[Pemuda]

hm....:cool::cool: why typical MAS players excuse you are using? :D:D
a lost is a lost :D:D
anyway RM623 is a good deal....
FYI, just received my Ti10 2nd Gen from China yesterday
my Ti10 family expanded

LOL :D:D You got me, dude. You got me real good!
Anyway, I was also injured ... knee not in good condition, I was tired n exhausted from work and my stomach not feeling too good either ;)

Anyway, after using the Yonex NS9900, I must say there is a difference if I compare it to my Apacs VH1800. Its like driving a BMW 5 series and Honda Civic.

Bro, Victor shoes ok, right?
You are like my badminton mentor la.

[danielwong]

LOL :D:D You got me, dude. You got me real good!
Anyway, I was also injured ... knee not in good condition, I was tired n exhausted from work and my stomach not feeling too good either ;)

Anyway, after using the Yonex NS9900, I must say there is a difference if I compare it to my Apacs VH1800. Its like driving a BMW 5 series and Honda Civic.

Bro, Victor shoes ok, right?
You are like my badminton mentor la.


yeah how about you are draw inside a tough group and the shuttle is too slow??? :D:D:D
Victor shoes? of coz is good...make sure is the one wore by LYD...

[AmD_2224]

Sorry guy! I am in THAILAND.
And here the ns9900 only come with TH code and only 3u.
In THAILAND you can buy 4200-4600 bath.
And quality is diferrent by dealer.
You should try by yourself before buying it.
Good luck.




dear rotchanasak,
im in thailand also..i plan to buy ns9900..
i would like to know what u meaning by "quality is different by dealer"
and please recommend which shop should i buy ...(near to mbk area)...
thank in advance

[rotchanasak]

dear rotchanasak,
im in thailand also..i plan to buy ns9900..
i would like to know what u meaning by "quality is different by dealer"
and please recommend which shop should i buy ...(near to mbk area)...
thank in advance

You can buy them around NATIONAL STADIUM.
Like SPORT MARKETTING SHOP , FIRST SPORT SHOP etc.
But like I said , there are many different in quality of NS9900.
Even in the same shop but with 10 racs ther are only 2-3 racs with the same
head balance.
So pick NS9900 about 2-3 racs that you love most and then ask for advise from the shop owner that which one is the best among this.
He / She will answer you with honesty for sure.
Take a little time for it but you will get NS9900 that suit for you.
good luck.

[george@chongwei]

You can buy them around NATIONAL STADIUM.
Like SPORT MARKETTING SHOP , FIRST SPORT SHOP etc.
But like I said , there are many different in quality of NS9900.
Even in the same shop but with 10 racs ther are only 2-3 racs with the same
head balance.
So pick NS9900 about 2-3 racs that you love most and then ask for advise from the shop owner that which one is the best among this.
He / She will answer you with honesty for sure.
Take a little time for it but you will get NS9900 that suit for you.
good luck.
do you know any badminton shop in phuket?

[george@chongwei]

hm....:cool::cool: why typical MAS players excuse you are using? :D:D
a lost is a lost :D:D
anyway RM623 is a good deal....
FYI, just received my Ti10 2nd Gen from China yesterday
my Ti10 family expanded
wow.. u bought ti-10 again!:eek:?? sp coded?

[rotchanasak]

do you know any badminton shop in phuket?

So sorry about that,I do not know the shop in there.
But the cheapest and most quality is around NATIONAL STADIUM for sure.

[Sealman]

do you know any badminton shop in phuket?

datuk, u can check out the Supersports outlet at Central dept store.
http://www.centralfestivalphuket.com/

ps: pls behave in phuket :D

[rotchanasak]

datuk, u can check out the Supersports outlet at Central dept store.
http://www.centralfestivalphuket.com/

ps: pls behave in phuket :D

Ok. If for you need to buy it at department store.
so you should know that it will come with very expensive price
around 5000-6000 bath.
if price is nothing so go on there.
Good luck.

[cooler]

datuk, u can check out the Supersports outlet at Central dept store.
http://www.centralfestivalphuket.com/

ps: pls behave in phuket :Dwhy, is there something there i should watch out for?:D

[silentheart]

Now I can use Phuk, frack and it will not get edit it out. More vocabulary for me.

[Pete LSD]

Or you can use fcuk!

[cooler]

Or you can use fcuk!but that is a registered trademark:p

[Pete LSD]

Dink right. Any other combo :D?


but that is a registered trademark:p

[LD rules!]

fkuc ??????????

[dawei94]

I thought 2U JP only?
Why e78/sohubuy have 2U SP/TW NS9900?
http://sohubuy.com/slist.asp?factory=YONEX&sort=2

[LD rules!]

I thought 2U JP only?
Why e78/sohubuy have 2U SP/TW NS9900?
http://sohubuy.com/slist.asp?factory=YONEX&sort=2

It is possible to get a 2U SP coded nanospeed, the TW will be 3u I would have thought

[dawei94]

Both the TW and SP codes have 2Us available, at least thats what they claim

[isben]

There is 2U for TW coded NS9900. I got 2 of them in Taipei

[cephas_chan]

I find it much easier to adjust from AT/Ti-10 to NS than NS to AT/Ti-10.

I felt the same here...

[cephas_chan]

Recently tried the NS9900 3UG4. Initially, i thot it was another of YY head-light racket without any solid feel to it. Oh boy, i was totally wrong!!:eek:

Wasn't too sure abt the string tension, as it was from my fren's, but roughly i guessed it to be around 25lbs.

Currently, i'm using AT500 3UG5 (past few years), which is head heavy & Apacs Nano 900 4UG2 (past few months), which is head-light balance. The AT is powerful in delivering the smashes but it requires more arm power to produce its full potential, inversely, the apacs is a fun racket to play with, as it defends quite well.

In terms of feel (control) of hitting the shuttle, i would rank apacs with the least feel, AT500 better feel & NS9900 with the best feel & control. The word to use on the NS9.9k racket is...it's kind of "fluid" in its feel. It has gotten the head-light, at the same time, stable feel to it. Meaning, it provides the speed/agility of a head-light racket but with the firmness (maybe due to its stiffness) of a head-heavy racket. So when i tried to play a controlled cross court drive, it gave me the ability to change the direction of play faster & easier. When i tried to play a smash, the power was also on par with my AT500 & the RECOVERY after the smash was alarming quick!

It was a MIXED feeling when i played with this racket, but IT was a good feeling, very good indeed. I felt as if this racket had two different kind of materials built into it, the head part with super light material X & the middle to lower part using super stable material Y.

Last but not least, there wasn't any vibration (little) felt when i play hard smashes, which made this YY racket a worthy price to pay for. Not too sure abt other brands' replica though....you can try & let me knw ya.....;)

[rotchanasak]

Recently tried the NS9900 3UG4. Initially, i thot it was another of YY head-light racket without any solid feel to it. Oh boy, i was totally wrong!!:eek:

Wasn't too sure abt the string tension, as it was from my fren's, but roughly i guessed it to be around 25lbs.

Currently, i'm using AT500 3UG5 (past few years), which is head heavy & Apacs Nano 900 4UG2 (past few months), which is head-light balance. The AT is powerful in delivering the smashes but it requires more arm power to produce its full potential, inversely, the apacs is a fun racket to play with, as it defends quite well.

In terms of feel (control) of hitting the shuttle, i would rank apacs with the least feel, AT500 better feel & NS9900 with the best feel & control. The word to use on the NS9.9k racket is...it's kind of "fluid" in its feel. It has gotten the head-light, at the same time, stable feel to it. Meaning, it provides the speed/agility of a head-light racket but with the firmness (maybe due to its stiffness) of a head-heavy racket. So when i tried to play a controlled cross court drive, it gave me the ability to change the direction of play faster & easier. When i tried to play a smash, the power was also on par with my AT500 & the RECOVERY after the smash was alarming quick!

It was a MIXED feeling when i played with this racket, but IT was a good feeling, very good indeed. I felt as if this racket had two different kind of materials built into it, the head part with super light material X & the middle to lower part using super stable material Y.

Last but not least, there wasn't any vibration (little) felt when i play hard smashes, which made this YY racket a worthy price to pay for. Not too sure abt other brands' replica though....you can try & let me knw ya.....;)

So surprice to hear from head heavy rac player about that.
For me I use NS7700 before NS9900 very very difference in all term.
But as you know they are the same head light rac.
Last night I play with my old NS7700 and my friend borrow my NS9900.
I play with very strange feel not NS7700 IS BAD but I prefer NS9900 is better.My score drop in quality but I still mange to win but very hard.
So if someone read this please think again that NS9900 is one among best ever rac for sure.

[george@chongwei]

datuk, u can check out the Supersports outlet at Central dept store.
http://www.centralfestivalphuket.com/

ps: pls behave in phuket :D
i went to Jungceylon shopping mall that day and went inside supersport to look for some racket..and to my surprise..there's not a single badminton racket being sell there? then i went to Sports Wear, another shop.. saw quite a few badminton racket.th coded of course. .all latest yonex racket available there.. including the 100th ae badminton racket stuffs and all..im lucky to touch touch and see the racket in front of my own eyes:D..

the price is about 4000-7900 baht if i'm not mistaken..:D

sorry for the off topic.:p yeah, in phuket luckily i'm very extra careful, so luckily no extraordinary things happen:)

[wiwi86]

I just checked my NS9900 and there are some paint chip at the racket frame due to me clashing with my partner's racket last night. Celaka! Later on, I will go to the shop to get some marker pen and colour over it.

Thats the problem when you buy expensive rackets. :o

I will put my NS9900 pics up soon, by this week. I am not on leave today la, though my lady boss likes me a lot, I still need to get stuff done on time for her. :p

dont worry too much about the paint chip. after all, it is just cosmetic injury on your racquet. it wont affect your playing. haha :)

[cephas_chan]

So surprice to hear from head heavy rac player about that.
For me I use NS7700 before NS9900 very very difference in all term.
But as you know they are the same head light rac.
Last night I play with my old NS7700 and my friend borrow my NS9900.
I play with very strange feel not NS7700 IS BAD but I prefer NS9900 is better.My score drop in quality but I still mange to win but very hard.
So if someone read this please think again that NS9900 is one among best ever rac for sure.

I was surprised too. Bcos usually head light racket won't give a solid feel to a swing i.e. the racket head weight leading the swing momentum. The below picture illustrates what i mean. Dat give the NS9.9k the speed & good feel i'm talking abt. The head light effect might cause the numb or non-feedback feel of NS9.9k that some users are experiencing...

http://i586.photobucket.com/albums/ss302/kingerchan/ns9900.jpg

[armortec800df]

Guys, does anyone know where could I buy NS9900 coded with 2UG5 in Singapore? Try TW-3UG5 before, find it too light and sold it.
Thanks.

[LD rules!]

BCers

Does anyone know if there I a 2nd Generation Nanospeed 9900 ? I was looking through the 2010-2011 book, and it claims that it has Ultra PEF in the shaft, then I looked in the 2009-2010 and there is no mention at all of Ultra PEF in the Nanospeed 9900, I checked the website, to see if this had been a print error but it appears that it hasn't.
So is this a new 2nd gen ?

[Blitzzards]

BCers

Does anyone know if there I a 2nd Generation Nanospeed 9900 ? I was looking through the 2010-2011 book, and it claims that it has Ultra PEF in the shaft, then I looked in the 2009-2010 and there is no mention at all of Ultra PEF in the Nanospeed 9900, I checked the website, to see if this had been a print error but it appears that it hasn't.
So is this a new 2nd gen ?
The Ultra PEF "technology feature" is not listed under the NS9900 in the 2010 Japanese catalogue. I believe what you've seen is just a simple typo.

[s0nnay]

Yonex have a tendency to do this in the catalogues, I know it occured in one of the ultimum ti racket specs. aswell few years ago.

[LD rules!]

The Ultra PEF "technology feature" is not listed under the NS9900 in the 2010 Japanese catalogue. I believe what you've seen is just a simple typo.

It's not just in the book it's on the Yonex UK website
Www.yonex.co.uk/badminton/Product.aspx?ProdID=476
1800 post

[LD rules!]

so anyone know about wheter or not This is a different nanospeed 9900 or the same one, as they realeased in April 2009

[demolidor]

And only on the UK website ;). Ultra PEF wouldn't make much sense with the NS series anyway, and a 2nd gen with no change in paintwork? ...

[demolidor]

To add: catalogues can contain errors. I saw quite a large list for the JP one on the japanese Yonex website a short while ago, trying to find it now but unsuccesfully so far ... :D went way too far already, here it is: http://www.yonex.co.jp/news/2010/02/1002221400.html (more so for the tennis one I see)

[LD rules!]

And only on the UK website ;). Ultra PEF wouldn't make much sense with the NS series anyway, and a 2nd gen with no change in paintwork? ...

It's not just one place it says that it contains Ultra PEF it says it in two places on that page. And in the book anyway like you said it wouldn't make much sence, the nanospeed range are all about repulsion, so ultra PEF wouldn't work in this racket. And yes they haven't changed the paintwork

[jymbalaya]

i think they were embellishing the Specifications a bit too much. don't worry about it. if you like the NS9900, play with it.

[dawei94]

I think if they released a new version of the top nanospeed, they would have had a big advertising campaign and some new paint

[AlweiSTX]

Hi guys, just still pricing indicator:
In Wuhan (DC of Hubei province) @ Yonex store: 1990 RMB (1 € equals 9,29 RMB for an indication).

Cheers,

A

[nz2010]

Did anyone try the NS9900 2U TW version? How was the paint/frame/feel compare to SP/AS/US? As I got one NS9.9k NZ code 3U/G4 and feel a little light for me but still powerful, so I would like to buy a 2U version hoping more power and can play single. Can someone rate the 2U and 3U in term of (feel, power, control, defence, maneuverability)? Thanks.

[concretemad]

ns 9.9k 2u appear in any other code than tw and jp?

[rapidfire]

What string do u all prefer for ns9900?

[nz2010]

According to yonex catalogue that someone posted on this forum it will be NBG95 and BG65Ti. If you want more power I think BG85 very good too but not as durable as 65 and 95. Problem with BG65Ti is the tension, you should string it at 1 or 2 more lbs in case tension drop.

[Blitzzards]

I recently cut the strings off my NS9900 to prepare for a new restring and simultaneously removed the grip. Out of curiousity I measured the dry balance point without the string and grip.

It turned out the be 305mm. Is this considered head heavy? :D

[dawei94]

overgrip or replacement grip?

[Blitzzards]

overgrip or replacement grip?
I use towel grip with my NS9900. The dry balance point was however measured without both the string and grip (so empty frame and bare/naked wooden handle).

[LD rules!]

Just restrung my Nanospeed 9900 @ 26lbs, (Victor VS850 string) will be able to test it tomorrow, I haven't used my NS9900, in over a month, so I will want to see if it is able to convince me away from my SW35. I need to make a decision between NS9900 and SW35 for a tournament I have soon.

[Voldemont]

Just restrung my Nanospeed 9900 @ 26lbs, (Victor VS850 string) will be able to test it tomorrow, I haven't used my NS9900, in over a month, so I will want to see if it is able to convince me away from my SW35. I need to make a decision between NS9900 and SW35 for a tournament I have soon.
@LD rules, you are already in love with your SW35, aren't you? ;)
I bet you will stick with SW35.
I did. Tried to switch back to NS9900 too, but it was already too late. The NS9900 was too headlight, less powerful but. I missed a lot of shots as the racket is too responsive, too fast.
Good luck on your tournament. :D

[LD rules!]

@LD rules, you are already in love with your SW35, aren't you? ;)
I bet you will stick with SW35.
I did. Tried to switch back to NS9900 too, but it was already too late. The NS9900 was too headlight, less powerful but. I missed a lot of shots as the racket is too responsive, too fast.
Good luck on your tournament. :D

well, I am not sure wheter or not I will switch back to the NS9900, I think I will switch to the SW35, full time for singles, but I will give the NS9900 a last try, in regards to singles, otherwise it will remain a doubles racket.
Regarding the tournament: Thanks :D

[Blitzzards]

well, I am not sure wheter or not I will switch back to the NS9900, I think I will switch to the SW35, full time for singles, but I will give the NS9900 a last try, in regards to singles, otherwise it will remain a doubles racket.
Regarding the tournament: Thanks :D
There's a simple reason why the NS9900 is mostly seen as a doubles racquet even though it is originally conceived as a repulsive "singles" racquet: you'll have to be on your top form if you want to use it effectively in singles.

Firstly the racquet is head light to even balance meaning that it won't help you in clearing or smashing or generating fast head speed (like how the Armortecs and the SW35 will due to their head weight) if you don't apply enough wrist flick. Then the racquet is pretty stiff meaning that if your swing is not consistently hard enough your shots won't come out effectively all the time compared to a slightly flexier racquet.

One of the only professional players who I think can pull it off using the NS9900 for singles will be Chen Hong, who has shown very good performance using the NS8000 in professional singles (some very good cases are his victories against LD in AE2005 final and BOTH TH and PG in WC2006). Most people would have thought the NS8000 (predecessor to NS9900, NS9000 is a little more different as it doesn't have the slim head profile, has the Elastic Ti in its frame instead of Fullerene like both NS8000 and NS9900 and is more even balanced) was more of a doubles racquet too as how the NS9900 is seen as now. Bao Chunlai also used it a lot during 2005 but his performance wasn't as significant as Chen Hong's; both used to be 1st gen Ti-10 users in the professional singles circuit.

Thus simply put, in doubles one would not have to concentrate on game strategy and be subjected to game psychology as much as in singles and can therefore put more focus in using the NS9900 more effectively. Arguably NS9900 demands a higher strength input than most other "singles" racquets for making good shots although the shot power produced is amazingly significant at full power input ;)

[LD rules!]

@LD rules, you are already in love with your SW35, aren't you? ;)
I bet you will stick with SW35.
I did. Tried to switch back to NS9900 too, but it was already too late. The NS9900 was too headlight, less powerful but. I missed a lot of shots as the racket is too responsive, too fast.
Good luck on your tournament. :D

You are correct Voldemont just couldn't get used to it at all, I was too quick to the shuttle, looks like SW35 is the racket for me.:)

[paulstewart64]

I've just posted a video review of Nanospeed 9900 on my blog www.badminton-coach.co.uk (http://www.badminton-coach.co.uk)

Whilst some of you would prefer the technical stuff like balance point to mm, I prefer to test a racquet based on performance and compare to other models from the same manufacturer for reference.

Hope you like it.

Paul
www.badminton-coach.co.uk (http://www.badminton-coach.co.uk)

[T-maker]

hahaha... my ns 9900 n amortec 900p are already in the 'wrap'..meaning already into the museum...no longer in use...

2 of ea btw...:D:D

[Vesped]

do the CH coded ns9900 have CH in bold written on the shaft above the cone like the SP coded racquet's pictures do earlier in the thread?

[justsomekid]

yep the ch coded ones do(got one myself) but the tw coded doesnt, wierd eh :)

[Vesped]

ahh thanks :) yeah it confused me as well cos the UK coded racquets i have dont have those :/

[Smash-Tajam]

I have AT900P, AT900T, and NS9900, all 3U.
I feel very comfortable with both AT900P & T, and I totally agree with the description for NS9900 regarding its
stiffness and light weight for Doubles play, but why do I feel the NS9900 vibrates a lot at impact as if its a cheapo racket ?
I have sore elbow after the game with NS9900, I don't have this elbow problem if I use only the AT900.
They are strung at about the same tension, 25-26lbs.

[T-maker]

I have AT900P, AT900T, and NS9900, all 3U.
I feel very comfortable with both AT900P & T, and I totally agree with the description for NS9900 regarding its
stiffness and light weight for Doubles play, but why do I feel the NS9900 vibrates a lot at impact as if its a cheapo racket ?
I have sore elbow after the game with NS9900, I don't have this elbow problem if I use only the AT900.
They are strung at about the same tension, 25-26lbs.

i don't have sore elbow... only sore 'ego'... hahahahaha....

mine's strung at 29 btw... but nowadays,they're 'rested'....

[concretemad]

@Smash-Tajam&T-Maker,

pls PM me if you guys keen to let your ns9900s go. i have been using at900p too and just manage to get hold of this. but i feel it is doing better for me. agree that it 'vibrates' a bit more but darn, it feel good at net and taking harsh smashes.

[Smash-Tajam]

Hi Concretemad,
Its good to know that someone out there also feel the vibration from NS9900, at least now I know its normal, and I fully agree with you its performance at the net, I would like to also comment its amazing quality for accuracy when doing placement shots despite the additional explosive energy needed to execute.

As for letting it go, well I plan to use it for another while and if my elbow can handle it after I re-string it to probably 24lbs, I plan to use it as my main racket for a long time. I am currently using AT900P as main weapon of choice but if there is a tournament coming up I will switch to NS9900 couple of weeks before the tournament to give myself ample time to adjust to it.

[LD rules!]

Hi Concretemad,
Its good to know that someone out there also feel the vibration from NS9900, at least now I know its normal, and I fully agree with you its performance at the net, I would like to also comment its amazing quality for accuracy when doing placement shots despite the additional explosive energy needed to execute.

As for letting it go, well I plan to use it for another while and if my elbow can handle it after I re-string it to probably 24lbs, I plan to use it as my main racket for a long time. I am currently using AT900P as main weapon of choice but if there is a tournament coming up I will switch to NS9900 couple of weeks before the tournament to give myself ample time to adjust to it.

I don't feel vibrations with my NS9900.

[Smash-Tajam]

Hi LD rules!,
My NS9900 is SP coded 3UG5, what is yours for comparison sake ?

[LD rules!]

Mine is 3UG3, original grip removed, one one AC102 super grap, on top of the wood, I didn't feel any vibrations with the original grip on, and I haven't felt any vibrations without the original grip. Mine is UK coded.

[T-maker]

@Smash-Tajam&T-Maker,

pls PM me if you guys keen to let your ns9900s go. i have been using at900p too and just manage to get hold of this. but i feel it is doing better for me. agree that it 'vibrates' a bit more but darn, it feel good at net and taking harsh smashes.

sorry mate... wrong person to ask !!! hahaha

[ns9900]

yes, can feel it vibrates relatively more as compared to my arc8dx and at900t. 3ug5 as well. but it is still my favourite racket for now. light yet powerful. cheers! :)

[rotchanasak]

I also do not have any feel of vibration ,also my partner too.And for whom want to play with hard smash for your main weapon.This is only my comment I play with AT70MG my smash have a "bang" but get out of the court,clear with it very easy compare with NS9.9K.But one thing I notice from AT70MG is there is no accurate compare with NS9.9K.So if one is suit my style will be NS9.9K not AT70MG because I prefer movement pressure tactics than shot pressure,I smash when opportunity is clear.So please not compare head light and head heavy that is better than one.But which one that suit your style and go get it.Once again rac+string+tension+grip+technique=your good extened arm as well.

[nickspeed9900]

yes, can feel it vibrates relatively more as compared to my arc8dx and at900t. 3ug5 as well. but it is still my favourite racket for now. light yet powerful. cheers! :)

you're right, it's the most powerful head light balance racket i ever have. In men double, i provide a string of non-stop long range missiles perfectly, great in front of the net. I still able to pull a successful harsh smash with tired hand. A lighter version of Z Slash.

[nickspeed9900]

What string do u all prefer for ns9900?

Nanogy98 @ 26lbs. The racket itself generates great repulsions + the nanogy string + great skills = Highly responsive powerful racket.

[ghooga]

Hmmm...I wonder if a 2U NS9900 is a heavy head-light racket??
=.="

[concretemad]

i own two 2u. it is still head light compare to armortec 3u when i balance them. but its head heavier than my 2u ti 10 3rd.

[gavinloh]

I am testing NS9900 with BG66 Ultimax @ 26lbs tonight. I have 2x NS9900, so far still prefer BG85 compare BG98. Still thinking what stencil to use on my racquet, hehe. Provide some review after this.

[nickspeed9900]

Make sure the Nanospeed9900 is genuine... I've seen so many fake NS9900 in the markets, cost only $40 to $50, (which i rate them not even worth $10 unless you're backyard shuttler)

[ghooga]

i own two 2u. it is still head light compare to armortec 3u when i balance them. but its head heavier than my 2u ti 10 3rd.

Hi concretemad, thanks for the feedback! I wonder if those 2U NS9900 are your main rackets? How powerful are those rackets when they are still head light? Look forward to hearing from you :)

[Yoppy]

I said this before and I'll say it again: NS9900 is d best!!! :)

[concretemad]

Hi concretemad, thanks for the feedback! I wonder if those 2U NS9900 are your main rackets? How powerful are those rackets when they are still head light? Look forward to hearing from you :)

am only using one as i seldom play. the other i left it unstrung. for me, i can smash hardest with it. better than the 2u ti10 3rd i own.

[hop-step]

Anyone here playing both 2U NS9900 and 3U NS9900? Does your smash defense suffer from using the heavier 2U?
I understand 3U NS9900 doesnt smash as hard as Z slash or Amortec 700. But how close the 2U NS9900 in smashing power?
And my main concern is how the 2U NS9900 defense the smashes compare to the 3U version?
Thanks for the input everyone.

[gavinloh]

NS9900 and BG66 Ultimax is a match made from heaven. You have the control and repulsion for the double. Read my review at string area. I will be testing with other strings such as Carlton and Gamma soon.I owned 2x NS9900 3U.

[lining]

Is the nano9900 a powerful racquet ? Can be use in single ? will i lose Power ? thxto answer guys ;)

[demolidor]

Any racket can be used in singles or doubles :p. Lose power compared to what?
If you have to ask perhaps you should look at something else already ...

[Hunterex196]

Hi guys, I was wondering if the Armortec 900 Technique (3u) or the Nanospeed 9900 (2u) be better for doubles? I play singles as well and I have no problem wif handeling a 2u (i have a 2u Arc10). Which would you recommend for both singles and doubles??

Derek

[nz2010]

Hi guys, I was wondering if the Armortec 900 Technique (3u) or the Nanospeed 9900 (2u) be better for doubles? I play singles as well and I have no problem wif handeling a 2u (i have a 2u Arc10). Which would you recommend for both singles and doubles??

Derek

Since you are playing with 2U Arc10 and have no problem of handling it then I think NS9900 2U is better (great for single). NS9900 2U will give you more power over the 3U AT900T. IMO AT900T 3U is better in double and NS9900 2U is better in single. I think it depends on whether you are like to play single or double more.

[Hunterex196]

i see, thanks, personally i like singles more but my school has enough singles players and not enough doubles so i get stuck in doubles haha. however, how would you compare the at900technique to the nanospeed 9900 in terms of smashing and crosscourt drops?? my two fav techniques :P anyhow, I'm actually more used to head heavy rackets such as the armortec and muscle power series, how long do you think I'll need to adjust??

[Triptens]

Yonex NanoSpeed 9900 is the sum total of all NanoSpeeds. Every thing from the lowest end NanoSpeeds upto NS900os and NS9000x have been tweaked, thereby it (NS9900) is the culmination that produced the strongest, most resilient, most manoeuvrable and stiffest of them all the NS series!

[mitchaayx3]

hey, im planning to get a ns9900, but idk if i should make it 2U or 3U. i know 2U is suitable for singles and 3U is suitable for doubles, but idk what to choose! Cause i always switch from mixed and singles. any suggestions?

[ants]

My suggestion is to go with a 2u version. Long term it is worth it.

[MilGauss]

hey, im planning to get a ns9900, but idk if i should make it 2U or 3U. i know 2U is suitable for singles and 3U is suitable for doubles, but idk what to choose! Cause i always switch from mixed and singles. any suggestions?

Since NS9900 is head light, it would be great to get hold of a 2u if you can find one readily because even with the added few grams in weight it still swings very fast. The extra weight must add that extra punch too without sacrificing too much maneuverability. Hope this helps, enjoy!

[mitchaayx3]

My suggestion is to go with a 2u version. Long term it is worth it.

mkaay. thank you! :)

[juventus1]

i see, thanks, personally i like singles more but my school has enough singles players and not enough doubles so i get stuck in doubles haha. however, how would you compare the at900technique to the nanospeed 9900 in terms of smashing and crosscourt drops?? my two fav techniques :P anyhow, I'm actually more used to head heavy rackets such as the armortec and muscle power series, how long do you think I'll need to adjust??

if you normally used heavy head rackets... forget about NS9900... owning it will affect your strength and timings... you can consider it if your age is catching up... I sold all my light head rackets...

[nz2010]

hey, im planning to get a ns9900, but idk if i should make it 2U or 3U. i know 2U is suitable for singles and 3U is suitable for doubles, but idk what to choose! Cause i always switch from mixed and singles. any suggestions?

I have played with NS9900 2U & 3U. If you are an advanced player level then maybe 2U is ok otherwise go for 3U, safer option. Switching from a 3U racket to a 2U racket you will get timing problem for sure. Personally I don't think NS9900 2U is good, swing quite slow and stiffer. Very odd compare to 3U version (very quick and head light-to-balance). If you feel the NS9900 too light then go for Arc8dx or Arc10 instead. I think best if you can test the racket out first and maybe play 1 or 2 games and see how it goes.

[concretemad]

i feel ns9900 3u is a bit too light. 2u is slower but its still much better in defense compare to the armortec 3u.

i only play double and i feel its a great racket. especially when u need fast swing, be it when drive or smash (best is when your opponent returns get weaker as you smash and u need to end the rally).

[angchor]

how much is the NS9900 selling in sg now?

[LD rules!]

My NS9900 has been officially retired from service, almost two years on since I got it.:) it is still great racket, it just can't compare with some of my other rackets which I prefer better. A great companion, but it's time for it to have a happy retirement instead of being broken. :p

[RSLvictorSOTX]

My NS9900 has been officially retired from service, almost two years on since I got it.:) it is still great racket, it just can't compare with some of my other rackets which I prefer better. A great companion, but it's time for it to have a happy retirement instead of being broken. :p

Oh that's atrocious:), try to add a little strip of lead (once and see how it plays) at the 3 and 9 o'clock, alternatively, I've also tried the 2 and 10 o' clock. Just an experiment, it plays about the same as the SiW35 but with heavier smashes and relatively easy to move around.

At this point and this kind of setup, I realize NS9900 is a tad stiffer than SiW35 (which I can bend during play) but not the NS9900:cool:.

Anyhow, I don't see the point in adding lead to my rackets, I like it as it is:D. It was a one-off trial and I'm glad for experiment's sake:D. Cheers.

[LD rules!]

Oh that's atrocious:), try to add a little strip of lead (once and see how it plays) at the 3 and 9 o'clock, alternatively, I've also tried the 2 and 10 o' clock. Just an experiment, it plays about the same as the SiW35 but with heavier smashes and relatively easy to move around.

At this point and this kind of setup, I realize NS9900 is a tad stiffer than SiW35 (which I can bend during play) but not the NS9900:cool:.

Anyhow, I don't see the point in adding lead to my rackets, I like it as it is:D. It was a one-off trial and I'm glad for experiment's sake:D. Cheers.

Yeah, I would try adding lead tape, but I think I will leave it, it is unstrung at the moment, so I think I will keep it that way.;) Anyway, I am happy with the SW35 and AT700LTD:)

[Yoppy]

if you normally used heavy head rackets... forget about NS9900... owning it will affect your strength and timings... you can consider it if your age is catching up... I sold all my light head rackets...There are now 41 pages on this thread, I wonder how many have you read? Fair enough its your opinion that you dont like NS9900. But making comment as such NS9900 is for oldies people, is simply not true. Im sure there are many 45yrs old grandpa who can still smash your fat *** around like chicken with a burning tail. Please draw a fine line when making comment. NS9900 is a great racket, the best around IMO. I own 25 rackets in total (many of them are head heavy rackets) and have tried many2 more. Its matter of preference (single or double) and your style of play, nothing more.

[RSLvictorSOTX]

Yeah, I would try adding lead tape, but I think I will leave it, it is unstrung at the moment, so I think I will keep it that way.;) Anyway, I am happy with the SW35 and AT700LTD:)

Btw, you are influential;)! Because I am really leaning (back against the wall) towards going the Yonex line for its value retaining purposes:D, so as I was trying to consolidate all my other rackets (which is not much at all...anyhow I decided to retain 1 of each) such as, Sotx Woven 16 (used to be 2), RSL X2 Gold (used to be 3), SiW35 and various Yonex rackets, in the end I purchase two more extra SiW35:cool:! Beats me. Guess, I shouldn't be reading too much good praises here;) (another dent in the cash box, another hole in the wallet:)). Cheers mate:cool:.

P.S. Oh, don't you start ditching those SiW35 of yours for MX80 or VT80 (have them all together at once if you will but please don't retire it just yet;)!).

[LD rules!]

Btw, you are influential;)! Because I am really leaning (back against the wall) towards going the Yonex line for its value retaining purposes:D

Nah, stick with Victor, SW35 deserves to be everyones go to racket :p


so as I was trying to consolidate all my other rackets (which is not much at all...anyhow I decided to retain 1 of each) such as, Sotx Woven 16 (used to be 2), RSL X2 Gold (used to be 3), SiW35 and various Yonex rackets, in the end I purchase two more extra SiW35:cool:! Beats me. Guess, I shouldn't be reading too much good praises here;) (another dent in the cash box, another hole in the wallet:)). Cheers mate:cool:.

So you have 4 now ?:p damn you have more than me !:p anyway they aren't hugely expensive. When you compare to something like a Z JP.:cool: and then going into other sports ((I mean just look at a golf club for instance)) I got three for around US$220 ish


P.S. Oh, don't you start ditching those SiW35 of yours for MX80 or VT80 (have them all together at once if you will but please don't retire it just yet;)!).

I won't be ditching the SW35 for a while, I am hoping to demo the MX80 soon, and then go from there, if I like it, then maybe... I won't be going to VT80 I just can't afford that (I would have to buy 3 for Intl tournaments and stuff) so it isn't cost effective. Victor give me stuff off, so I can go to MX80 maybe.

I think come November, I will still be using SW35 and 100% using Victor :)

[Babyface]

intl? .. international?

[demolidor]

Intentional, intentional ;) ...

[LD rules!]

intl? .. international?

Yep.... Thats the real goal anyway... I know that up until the end of May my badminton will be limited (due to study) but I know from the 1st of June till 21st of November, I am Training every day, (on and off court) hopefully I will make the qualification draw on the 23rd, and get a chance to play. (I would hate to be stuck on the reserve list...:()

[Babyface]

oic.. didnt know you were doing international.. thought you were doing national. good luck regardless

[LD rules!]

oic.. didnt know you were doing international.. thought you were doing national. good luck regardless

I hopefully will;) I will assess myself in October and see where I am. Then make a decision.:) u19 Nationals are in October, and Adults are in Febuary:)

[Babyface]

oic... post a vid of yourself playing mate.. would love to see your progression

[RSLvictorSOTX]

Nah, stick with Victor, SW35 deserves to be everyones go to racket :p



So you have 4 now ?:p damn you have more than me !:p anyway they aren't hugely expensive. When you compare to something like a Z JP.:cool: and then going into other sports ((I mean just look at a golf club for instance)) I got three for around US$220 ish



I won't be ditching the SW35 for a while, I am hoping to demo the MX80 soon, and then go from there, if I like it, then maybe... I won't be going to VT80 I just can't afford that (I would have to buy 3 for Intl tournaments and stuff) so it isn't cost effective. Victor give me stuff off, so I can go to MX80 maybe.

I think come November, I will still be using SW35 and 100% using Victor :)

I'm gonna add just one more to make it 5 SiW35s:cool:!

Way to go mate! You can soon be the poster boy for Victor UK;)!

[Gicutzu]

Yep.... Thats the real goal anyway... I know that up until the end of May my badminton will be limited (due to study) but I know from the 1st of June till 21st of November, I am Training every day, (on and off court) hopefully I will make the qualification draw on the 23rd, and get a chance to play. (I would hate to be stuck on the reserve list...:()

What country are you gonna represent? TPE, SIN, some other one?

[RSLvictorSOTX]

LD_rules is representing the UK highlands:cool:.

[Gicutzu]

LD_rules is representing the UK highlands:cool:.

SCO? :D 15characters

[mtakako]

Planning to start badminton again.. anyone know if this is similar to NS9000 Type X? stiffness?

[Yoppy]

Planning to start badminton again.. anyone know if this is similar to NS9000 Type X? stiffness?Yea it's very similar in stiffness to NS9000

[Tktung]

Hello,

I just buy a NS9900 but i'm not sure of this racquet. Can you help me to check it, pls !

NS9900
3U/G4
9811511/071202FR
Made in Japan
Price : 230 USD

Thx a lot.

[iceshoc]

I just recently bought an NS9900.
Played it for the first time today.

awesome racket!! very quick for doubles. smashes are quite powerful and defence is really good.

[LD rules!]

What country are you gonna represent? TPE, SIN, some other one?

I suppose my "location" can be quite decieving :p


LD_rules is representing the UK highlands:cool:.

SCO? :D 15characters

Correct.... Someone remind me to put "UK Highlands" on the back of my shirt.:p

[RSLvictorSOTX]

I suppose my "location" can be quite decieving :p




Correct.... Someone remind me to put "UK Highlands" on the back of my shirt.:p

The Highlander:cool:!

[jmore]

just wanna say that i love my ns9900!!!

[T-maker]

have you tried VT 80 ? lol...

[staiger]

have you tried VT 80 ? lol...

what's the point !! the ns9900 is perfect in every aspect and cant generally say that VT80 is a better racket ---''the technology that enable it to sound , lol, what a waste'' heard Vt80 is a much powerful racket, but i would sacrifice that 4/5mph for a more maneuverable racket to get me round the court quicker + increase in defence ability .love the ns9900 .......(especially when ns8000 now is out of production )

[Yoppy]

what's the point !! the ns9900 is perfect in every aspect and cant generally say that VT80 is a better racket ---''the technology that enable it to sound , lol, what a waste'' heard Vt80 is a much powerful racket, but i would sacrifice that 4/5mph for a more maneuverable racket to get me round the court quicker + increase in defence ability .love the ns9900 .......(especially when ns8000 now is out of production )I second that, you are in the zone dude :D

[staiger]

I second that, you are in the zone dude :D

you should have seen what i just wrote on ''apacs fan club'' thread. Some amateurs started to mouthing off the tantrum 200 which probably one of the best racket for Apacs. this is why I visit this site less now , because alot of them dont know what they are talking about .......and you cant rely on the review because you dont knw their level of play...

[Yoppy]

you should have seen what i just wrote on ''apacs fan club'' thread. Some amateurs started to mouthing off the tantrum 200 which probably one of the best racket for Apacs. this is why I visit this site less now , because alot of them dont know what they are talking about .......and you cant rely on the review because you dont knw their level of play...I have stop reading that thread ages ago, i can see now it hits 200 plus pages, thats amazing LOL

[sxg2009]

you should have seen what i just wrote on ''apacs fan club'' thread. Some amateurs started to mouthing off the tantrum 200 which probably one of the best racket for Apacs. this is why I visit this site less now , because alot of them dont know what they are talking about .......and you cant rely on the review because you dont knw their level of play...

Hello Sir, .... and now you should see my reply to that over there!

[Acumen]

My racquet mostly head heavy and VT80 as my main racquet.

Shop at AJ last week n found they have promo then i bought Yonex NS 9900.

Wow, so easy n nice to play with it especially during double. Very good in smash defend, fast return drive and smash accuracy.

Smash is not as powerful as vt80 but due to fast swing and more accuracy on placing the birdy more close to the line, it is quite good in single as well. Anyhow, vt80 may still do the same just maybe i'm not able to :p

Surprise me is this head light racquet very good in clear, not sure is it bcos i'm using BG66 Ultimax. My vt80 is BG80.

Still like VT80 but i start to like this easy and fast playing style with NS9900.

[Yoppy]

just wanna say that i love my ns9900!!!me too :p:p:p............................

[Yoppy]

Even with all the hype with VT80 (which i found it to be very good racket), I still think NS9900 is the best racket YY ever produce

[MilGauss]

...certainly the best in the Nano Speed series, no question, FULL STOP.:cool:

[jairbak]

Can someone tell me where I can buy the nano 9900 in holland??
or any high end yonex racket?
:)

[samsudds]

:phttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WN3FwZEhLGI/Tg0srn_jgwI/AAAAAAAACTU/jWxt5fZlWv0/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+2.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZBliiPGrgro/Tg0swo5f8hI/AAAAAAAACTY/HickqaRhBCg/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+3.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5qMWXCODu3Y/Tg0tKRH4o1I/AAAAAAAACTc/K0e8sjYUQyU/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+4.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-OZtq5rK9uvg/Tg0tO0iucDI/AAAAAAAACTg/sO_yNChDG0o/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+1.jpg

[samsudds]

me too :p:p:p............................
just purchased ZSlash (capable of 421mph:eek:)....perfect match for NS9900....:D

[MilGauss]

Recently, the newer batches of Arc Sabre Z-Slash (yellow) suffers the same fate as the newer AT700 did. The string sinks into the frame (tried changing the grommets but it is only a temporary measure). Mine are strung at 27 pounds. So far so good with my older Zlashes (no sunken grommets,yet...I hope not.:mad:)! Unlike the NS9900, it's still going strong minus the issues! That being said, I still love my Zlashes!:cool:

[demolidor]

:phttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WN3FwZEhLGI/Tg0srn_jgwI/AAAAAAAACTU/jWxt5fZlWv0/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+2.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZBliiPGrgro/Tg0swo5f8hI/AAAAAAAACTY/HickqaRhBCg/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+3.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5qMWXCODu3Y/Tg0tKRH4o1I/AAAAAAAACTc/K0e8sjYUQyU/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+4.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-OZtq5rK9uvg/Tg0tO0iucDI/AAAAAAAACTg/sO_yNChDG0o/s1600/NS9900+LIMITED+1.jpg

Yes? http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php/100696-New-Yonex-NS-9900-Limited-Edition?p=1696486&viewfull=1#post1696486

What blog is using them :D?

[a|extan]

ns9900 is a fantastic racket

[Albert]

Hey guys, those of you who owns a Nano9900. Which version do you have? I have a 2U which I bought accidentally instead of a 3U. Is it worth getting the 3U one?

[surajaya]

Just curious, which one has faster swing speed : NS9900 or Z-Slash ?

[Yoppy]

Just curious, which one has faster swing speed : NS9900 or Z-Slash ?IMO NS9900 is faster

[eternalza]

I just brought NS-9900 LTD (TH CODE) (green color)

this racket is so worthy

[DreamSeeker]

had a 3U in SP, then swap it with an Z. now have a pair of 9900 1X3U JP, 1X2U SP

[DreamSeeker]

personally i think the new 9900 LTD is way over priced. its more expensive than the original 9900 (not a bit) and is it worth of pay that much just for a LTD? not really. i heard there are some changes in the newer version which is a bit stiffer and smashing is better. but im not entirely sure with that. is it that significantly better than the original 1? probably not. but at the end of the day, i havnt tried them so i cant tell are there actually a difference. hope someone here can share with more info! :)

[jackbanner]

personally i think the new 9900 LTD is way over priced. its more expensive than the original 9900 (not a bit) and is it worth of pay that much just for a LTD? not really. i heard there are some changes in the newer version which is a bit stiffer and smashing is better. but im not entirely sure with that. is it that significantly better than the original 1? probably not. but at the end of the day, i havnt tried them so i cant tell are there actually a difference. hope someone here can share with more info! :)

In Malaysia, the retail price (before discount) of 9900 ltd is lesser than the original version; rm899 v rm929.

[DreamSeeker]

ooooo thats good!! in HK it cost 1480 to orginial at 1080... after discount

[yurimaster2010]

All,
I ve ns9900, I plan to to buy ns9000
Any pro n cons over ns9900?
Also if the x or s version r better?

[yurimaster2010]

I want to increase my speed in my MD games
Any advise..nano ray don't seem helping with it's wide body swing

[demolidor]

Why don't you get a NS7000\instead. ..

[yurimaster2010]

Why don't you get a NS7000\instead. ..
Why ns7700?

[DreamSeeker]

the 9000X is better only if you think the 9900 is not stiff enough for you, the 9000x possibly a bit better in smashing (coz the shaft is stiffer)

I currently own a pair of 9900, I really liked it, suits very well with my hand. The swinging speed is good, feel very comfortable in net shots and pushes

The weakness about 9900 is the smashing isnt as solid and it demands a lot from your wrist.

[Badmintan]

The weakness about 9900 is the smashing isnt as solid and it demands a lot from your wrist.
Agreed. One can compensate for the solid smashing by having sore wrist.

The type X has thicker frame/shaft and is less aerodynamic in shape compared to NS9900.

NS9000X felt easier on the wrist compared to NS9900.

[concretemad]

I own most of the yonex latest model. For me (i play only doubles), it offer best in all aspects.

[eternalza]

NS-9900ltd and NANORAY 700RP & 700FX

is the best for double !

I love it

[yurimaster2010]

the 9000X is better only if you think the 9900 is not stiff enough for you, the 9000x possibly a bit better in smashing (coz the shaft is stiffer)

I currently own a pair of 9900, I really liked it, suits very well with my hand. The swinging speed is good, feel very comfortable in net shots and pushes

The weakness about 9900 is the smashing isnt as solid and it demands a lot from your wrist.


bro,
so u confirm ns9900 has slimmest frame and shaft to ns9000 s/x ? therefore better aerodynamic
so do u mean stiffness level : ns9000x >ns9900 >ns9000s ? therefore ns9000x more power in smash?
any comment on ns9000s as i heard its much easier to usage..

[DreamSeeker]

bro,
so u confirm ns9900 has slimmest frame and shaft to ns9000 s/x ? therefore better aerodynamic
so do u mean stiffness level : ns9000x >ns9900 >ns9000s ? therefore ns9000x more power in smash?
any comment on ns9000s as i heard its much easier to usage..

Sorry, I cant confirm with you about the frame, I dont know the difference among them, maybe ask badmintan?

In my opinion, yes. 9000x > 9900 > 9000s

9000s for me, is a racket for defending. I used my fd's once, it gave me a very good feeling in swinging and speed.

[yurimaster2010]

NS-9900ltd and NANORAY 700RP & 700FX

is the best for double !

I love it

its impossible for nanoray with wide body to gain more speed compare to ns9900.