Vincent604
04-04-2009, 12:44 PM
Can someone list the general differences between these two rackets?
For example; I know X is stiffer than S which creates more powerful but is harder to control.
What are the changes with the feel, weight and power of the 2 rackets. I read that the 9900 is head lighter and faster but not sure if it will produce the same power. The 9000X is supposedly the most head-heavy of it's series, is that true? I kinda like the power for my smashes.
I currently own 9000X and AT700 (both BG-80 26lbs), I'm an all-rounder player who leans toward power and offensive play in singles and doubles. Do I generally have the rackets that's suited for my style or should I make upgrades to NS9900 and AT900P for more power (even with trade-offs to having less defense)? I don't like Arc10 because it's too soft which makes it hard for me to generate power, same goes for AT900T for having a light and empty-feel swing.
For example; I know X is stiffer than S which creates more powerful but is harder to control.
What are the changes with the feel, weight and power of the 2 rackets. I read that the 9900 is head lighter and faster but not sure if it will produce the same power. The 9000X is supposedly the most head-heavy of it's series, is that true? I kinda like the power for my smashes.
I currently own 9000X and AT700 (both BG-80 26lbs), I'm an all-rounder player who leans toward power and offensive play in singles and doubles. Do I generally have the rackets that's suited for my style or should I make upgrades to NS9900 and AT900P for more power (even with trade-offs to having less defense)? I don't like Arc10 because it's too soft which makes it hard for me to generate power, same goes for AT900T for having a light and empty-feel swing.