View Full Version : fastest way to string a racket.
Intro
after the posts on stringing techniques and some thoughts plus some of my previous experience, here is what i think is optimal when comes to the speed of stringing a badminton racket.
i am assuming you already have basic knowledge of stringing and have at least strung a badminton racket or two.....
when stringing a badminton racket, if speed is what we are trying to optimize, in other words, if you have tons to do in life, or if you are a pro and get paid by the # of rackets you string/day, or if you are like me with very little patience, here is what i think will achieve the fastest stringing time.
before i describe any other tricks, there is one thing that is of most help : practice - there are a lot of fine details involved when it comes to stringing, feeding the string through holes, grabbing strings, clamping strings. the more practice, the faster, there is just no substitution to that one.
Equipment
stringing machine
the machine itself is crucial when it comes to speed. when choosing a machine, a crank machine is much more efficient than drop weight, there is just no question about it. there are too much trial and error involved in getting the correction tension in drop weight, even though drop weights are more accurate.
- fixed clamp, and non-swivel clamp. a non-swivel fixed clamp requires only one clamping action. there is no need to use swivel clamps for any badminton racket, chances of you finding a badminton racket that has diagonal stringing pattern is very close to zero
- supports, you want the least intrusive support you can find. some machines have big thumb screws for clamping the frame, those get in the way and sometimes the strinng may tangle in them and causes unneccessary delay. Alpha has some machines with just a bar and a v shape support. i think those are the best.
awl
an awl is essentially a needle with a handle. they are used for routing strings through the grommet
Yonex flying clamp
this little clamp is so efficient it is evil. there are a few place who sells it, will speed up the string by a sizable margin.
Procedure
ok, so assuming that we have the equipment per above, how do we proceed with the stringing? there are many way to string a racket, and most of these methods works. but there are some that are faster than the others.
the most important thing to think about when trying to string fast is the division of labor and minimizing unneccessary steps. it is much faster to weave-weave-weave instead of weave-tension-weave. there are less switching of tools involved.
so here is the steps:
first, measure and cut the main strings. if you need N feet of string, measure N/2 feet, and then double up and cut.
free weave the mains string. leaving a loop for the gripper. weave the whole racket, you may not have enough to weave the 11th section on the sides. that doesn't matter. during this weave process, you don't need to clamp the racket yet. that's up to you
side clamp racket (if desired) and tension mains. the tensioning pattern should be right-right-left-left-right-right-left-left , etc.
(some have suggested tensioning every other string. that is actually possible, however, i have not tried it myself, it would be interesting for the stringer among you to try and and report on the uniformity of the string tension)
when you have all the mains tensioned. we can start weaving the cross
weaving the cross string is probably the most time consuming process, it is almost completely skill dependent and this takes practice. there are however, a couple of things that can speed it up.
when weaving, try weaving diagonally, pulling the string diagonally causes less friction
when trying to feed strings through an occupied grommet, use the awl, stick the awl into the hole, it will create a better path for the string to go through. and you don't need to do it only when it is tight, i have seen one guy who stick the awl into the hole regardless. it never hurts, i guess.
weave from centerline outwards. this way, each time after you weave, you only need to pull half of the string through.
tension from centerline outwards. just like the mains, do upper-upper-lower-lower instead of upper-lower-upper-lower. this has the secondary effect of having a symmetric tension.
use the Yonex flying clamp to hold the string, this clamp is like a spring clip and the size of a spring clip, light weight and fast action, it is very fast to engage and disengage, and is also tight, i have seen people use it to hold 25+lb tension.
and that's about all i can think of. can anyone suggest speed improvement to the above?
this is the yonex flying clamp.
G'day Kwun,
Top post! - makes a lot of sense for a newbie stringer like me. Good thing is that I have the patience and time so I don't mind fiddling here and there. I must say I am fortunate to have x2 fly clamps and without these - I would have thrown the whole stringing jig out of window a long time ago thru sheer frustration! ;)
Kwun, excellent -- I think this belongs in the "articles" forum!
What do you think is fast. I take about 35 minutes from receiving a racket to having removed and replaced the strings and applied the logo by stencil. I also fit trebling top and bottom. A competition was held a few years ago in Gateshead by the various stingers and I think the winner took just over 15 minutes.
Jock
badrad
09-27-2002, 05:52 PM
Wow, 15 minutes. Does that include racquet prep, install, etc? Even if not, that's still pretty fast.
15 mins is pretty crazy. given avg 44 string sections on the racket, that's just around 20sec/section!
normally if a stringer can finish a job in 30mins, that's normal. imho, for a professional, that may be the min requirement. 25 would be considered fast. 20 is huffing and puffing.
At the Dutch open, there was one guy stringing rackets. Interested in learning from experienced stringers, i talked to him and watched him stringing a racket from start to finish. It was pretty impressive how fast he was working, especially because it didn't look like he was hurrying. He claimed, having 40 years experience, to do rackets in 20 mins, and when doing his best to be fast, 15 mins.
He used an electronical machine, with 2 point mounting system (pressing down the frame, side supports removed)
Things that looked special :
- after freestringing the main, tensioning the main from the left to the right of the racket ! Tensioning was done in 1 to 2 minutes. Used an awl in the first hole to 'clamp' the string.
- weaving the cross: not using the 'two fingers pushing' method, but using one hand beneath the strings and pulling the end of the string up and putting it back down after every weave ! like sewing. Sounds slow, but he did it soo bloody fast, like 3 or 4 seconds from one side of the racket to the other.
- awl usage : Used a shoerepair tool. Very thin. According to him the key of awl usage is to hold the tool close to the needle to have optimal feeling. Pull back when feeling resistanse. According to him most stringers push the awl too far causing the string to heat up and damage.
- Cross was done top-down. Used one 'double knot' starting the cross, which pulls itself tight after the first tensioning.
The racket he was doing was at 25 lbs, but he also did 30+ tensions.
Nediz
03-01-2005, 08:19 AM
This is the right tool, NEVER the awl. It just breaks the frame, eyelet and strings. I do an "empty" racket in 15 minutes easily with this tool. It is much more effectice the awl. The awl is used only in ancient history.
Nediz
Neil Nicholls
03-01-2005, 08:53 AM
This is the right tool, NEVER the awl. It just breaks the frame, eyelet and strings. I do an "empty" racket in 15 minutes easily with this tool. It is much more effectice the awl. The awl is used only in ancient history.
Nediz
what is it that you use this tool for?
jamesd20
03-01-2005, 08:56 AM
I have seen that tool used, but only when prestringing the racket, then tensioning. It is used to pull the loops through before fastening + tightening. For this jop it is more effective than ther awl.
It cannot be used where you need to thread the string through a tight hole though.
taneepak
03-01-2005, 05:27 PM
It is called a string mover, quite appropriately.
Nediz
03-02-2005, 04:22 AM
This tool is the best tool when inserting a string to the eyelet that is already reserved. That means that in every case where you put two strings through one eyelet. You stretch the first string from inside the frame so that the first string is not blocking the eyelet. At the same time it is very easy to put the cross string through the same eyelet.
You can save time, frames, eyelets and you nerves...
Trust me - do not use awl - use the hook (string mover).
Nediz
LazyBuddy
03-02-2005, 11:36 AM
You stretch the first string from inside the frame so that the first string is not blocking the eyelet. At the same time it is very easy to put the cross string through the same eyelet.
You can save time, frames, eyelets and you nerves...
Trust me - do not use awl - use the hook (string mover).
Nediz
When u stretch the 1st string (assume it's already tensioned), it will also add additional force (unbalaced) on the 1st string. Never have to metion, such extra force was applied to a lil section of the string piece. To me, it might create even more problem for the frame, gromments and mostly the string itself. :rolleyes:
Nediz
03-02-2005, 03:02 PM
When u stretch the 1st string (assume it's already tensioned), it will also add additional force (unbalaced) on the 1st string. Never have to metion, such extra force was applied to a lil section of the string piece. To me, it might create even more problem for the frame, gromments and mostly the string itself. :rolleyes:
You are wrong. You apply the additional force slow enough that the string will NOT stretch. The string will slide around the hook.
It is not the same thing as you hit the shuttle in very near the frame and the string breaks. In that case the string will not have time enough to slide. All stringers that have tested the hook will use it in future. No exceptions!
Nediz
taneepak
03-02-2005, 08:33 PM
The string mover and the awl are stringing tools for different applications. Strictly speaking, you cannot use the string mover to push a second string into a grommet that already has a string inside. The only tool that can insert a string through a grommet is your hand and fingers. The string mover is for you to pull the string by hooking the string between two grommets on the outside of the frame, if you pre-string your racquet, and it is also used to pull the cross string at a triangle pattern, with one hand holding the string mover at the top of the triangle, and with the other hand pulling the cross string to straighten it for tensioning. It is also used to hook the string on the inside of the frame near a common grommet and pull it ever so lightly to facilitate the entry of a second string. Some people use their index finger to do this : this is more gentle.
The awl can be used to facilitate the entry of a second string through a common grommet. It is best to use the string mover or your index finger to do this, if possible. There are some racquets with very small common (shared) grommets where the use of the string mover or the index finger will not work. Then and only then do you use the awl. A better method would be to pre-string your racquet, where the question and problem of inserting a second string into a common grommet do not arise. The awl has another more specialized role to play, and it is in the process of tightening the 3 tie-off knots for the ultimate in minimizing tension leak. But care and the use of the index finger are called for here, as it requires relatively high tension to pull a string, not through a grommet but over the top of the racquet frame. But this is another story. :D
davidcheng
06-02-2005, 05:35 AM
that's good idea to use string hook but it's hard to go cross through out. i try to pull up and down but it's really hard through out. would you mind tell me more detail skill.
Pete LSD
07-06-2005, 09:24 PM
Actually, the dental floss is gentler than the string mover.
that's good idea to use string hook but it's hard to go cross through out. i try to pull up and down but it's really hard through out. would you mind tell me more detail skill.
davidcheng
03-15-2006, 05:03 PM
that's new frame supports for restringing badminton rackets. you don't worry about frame supports blocked holes
Heftiforex
02-20-2007, 08:18 AM
how do you make the knots without loosing to much tension? atm for me, every knot is a new experiment :-O
utopia_imminent
03-07-2007, 11:44 AM
increase by 1 to 2 pounds. then tension and clamp. ensure when you clamp that you are leaving out as little un-tensioned string as possible by clamping as close to the edge as possible. then tie the knot.
i do triple half-hitch. the first one i pull as hard as i can to ensure not too much tension is lost. the other two would be done the same way but you don't have to pull so hard.
sudirman
07-18-2007, 10:04 AM
I have done 2 rackets so far, tried "half hitch+pro knot" rather than "double half hitch" the second time, looks much better to be honest.
Pete LSD
07-18-2007, 11:36 AM
Remember to use the stringer mover or tensioner to tighten the single half hitch knot first before proceeding to the pro knot :cool:.
I have done 2 rackets so far, tried "half hitch+pro knot" rather than "double half hitch" the second time, looks much better to be honest.
sudirman
07-18-2007, 04:14 PM
Remember to use the stringer mover or tensioner to tighten the single half hitch knot first before proceeding to the pro knot :cool:.
Yes, that's what I did for the second one, like a dream, thank you for the advice all the same!!
Oldhand
08-07-2008, 01:18 AM
Folks, see this thread (http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=58685).
Oh, I love to be mean :D
limbo88
12-10-2008, 11:22 AM
you may find it faster two piece in my uncle did 30 one day in around 15minutes each sometimes less
extremenanopowe
01-11-2009, 08:19 AM
20-25 mins is considered pro level. 15 is nerd. Flying clamps sure helps. ;)
Kiloo
06-04-2009, 12:19 AM
:crying: I am still on the one hour mark, but I dont hv much chance to practice. I'll hv to get a couple of flying clamps.
ae86trueno
06-04-2009, 12:28 AM
Normally took me about 1 hour too :)
Fastest I can do I think I did it in around 30 minutes but I prefer 1 hour. I prefer keeping the quality of the job, neat, and preweaving so the racket spend minimum time on tensioning part.
pro1992
06-21-2009, 04:24 PM
great thread kwun
extremenanopowe
09-11-2009, 09:47 AM
Its possible to be in 15mins if electronics being used. For those at 1 hour level, it's time for upgrade or a new version... ;)
silentheart
09-11-2009, 10:27 AM
I know this is an old thread. I just saw it and have time to see the video. A few comments
1) Regarding stringing time, to string a racquet on any machine, 20 min is prob the limit for any one from a empty frame to finish.
2) The video did bring back some of my childhood memory. I remember I help my mom making silk flower to make extra money (I didn't have to, it was interesting to kill time and to help my mom).
3) The racquets are tension by hand and there is almost always low tension. That is why they can do it so fast.
kewei88
12-14-2010, 03:00 AM
When doing 1 piece stringing method, how much string is need on the short side?
Kiloo
12-14-2010, 04:36 AM
Just 'split' your string in 2 equal parts and start on the 5th mains down up. crossing the middle and completing the one side. The other 1/2 will do the 6th to 11th mains + the crosses. Very simple really. In fact pity we do not get large reels or we could have done it in under 9m of string.
RacketStringer
10-22-2011, 11:31 AM
I am a new stringer and as i am a badminton player most of the rackets I have strung have been badminton rackets -approx 15 in all. The advice given is great but the place I lose the most time is when threading a string through a grommet already occupied by another string. I was worried about using an awl just as others here have suggested as it may damage the string that is in the grommet, not to mention the grommet itself and even the racket frame. I recently purchased a string mover just like the one another contributor has shown on here. However I have still found that I am very cautious as to how much pressure I apply as I worry about causing damage. I am impressed by those that can string a racket from start to finish in 30 minutes or so as it still takes me about an hour (as I say I am new to it). As far as the fastest possible time? Well when I was on the stringing course there was a guy there who was invited to visit the Chinese national team's stringing room at an international tournament. Apparently the Chinese stringers are almost as competetive as the players! Their top stringer strung a racket against a stopwatch and was clocked at just 7 minutes for the entire process!! It sounds impossible to someone like me who can only manage an hour, after 7 minutes I am lucky if I have got the first few mains done!!
johnlowe88
12-14-2011, 06:35 PM
You do need to be careful when using a string mover - doing this puts more tension on the string, but if you move it only enough to get the string through, then it should be ok.
Another way, if you have good eyes is to look through the grommet to see where the existing string is sitting - you should see that either top or bottom has a slightly larger opening. I cut the end of the string at an angle, to create a point then push it through the grommet in the direction of the larger opening. It should go through - but there is another technique I use. Push the pointed string into the grommet until it stops - don't push too hard to bend the string. Use a pair of long nose pliers, grip the string about 1 mm from the grommet then push in the string with the pliers - it should go in, then regrip the string 1 mm out and do this again. The string is quite stiff over a small length and it will push through the grommet, unless the string is bent - then it won't push. This technique means that you don't stress the existing string using the string mover - but I find it easier to use the string mover unless I have a very acute angle on the string, i.e. the outer mains.
LightSaber
12-14-2011, 07:21 PM
usually stringer will pull the string start from the middle of the main right?
what if the start from left to right? will it affect the frame? one of my racket strung this way, and the frame looks bended on one side.
johnlowe88
12-14-2011, 07:32 PM
usually stringer will pull the string start from the middle of the main right?
what if the start from left to right? will it affect the frame? one of my racket strung this way, and the frame looks bended on one side.
I think most stringers will string the mains from the middle and go outwards. To balance the frame properly just do one or two string on each side at a time. I haven't heard of anyone starting the mains from the left and then continuing to the other side - this would likely pull the frame out of shape.
I always start from the middle, clamp left string then tension and clamp the right string, thread the right again and tension and clamp, then go back to the left - tension and clamp, thread, tension and clamp, then go to the right - this way I am doing 2 strings on 1 side at a time. I use fixed clamps.
Kiloo
12-15-2011, 03:37 AM
usually stringer will pull the string start from the middle of the main right?
what if the start from left to right? will it affect the frame? one of my racket strung this way, and the frame looks bended on one side.
Might b impractical to string from one side thru the middle to the other side.
If u string at high tension u may even BREAK the frame.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.4 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.