I had a chance to try out the Stern 100 and 85 today. Stern 100 First impressions: Very visually appealing. Frame looks like the Nano 900 Power White but a bit thinner. Flex wasn't as stiff as other rackets I've used. Warm up: Plays like the Nano 900 Power White, but a faster swing (due to a thinner frame, which incidentally can hold more tension). It took a few minutes for me to adjust to the higher tension (I had it strung at 32x35lbs), but I was still able to get about the same power as the Nano 900 Power White at a slightly lower tension. Game time: It feels comfortable and natural, doesn't take any getting used to. Smashes are not as powerful (due to higher tension), but more accurate. I can use a shorter, quicker overhead swing for nice attacking clears whereas I couldn't do that as well with the Nano 900 Power White. Stern 85 First impressions: This reminds me of a chrome version of the AT900T. Head-heavy with a fast swinging frame. Warm up: Already warmed up. Game time: I played doubles with this, since I chose it as my doubles racket. Much more maneuverable than the Nano 900 I was using before, but still having enough power in the back court to cause some damage. Feels comfortable. Overall, both the rackets felt perfectly fine and comfortable with me. I think this is because they are not altogether different from rackets that I've played with in the past (AT900T, AT900P, Wilson Dynapower 9500, Nano 900 Power Red/White), which is great. Sorry I couldn't tell you more about the rackets, but I didn't want to say "it's a hard smashing racket" when perhaps I'm just having a good smashing day. I think they fit into my style of play very well so I can focus on my technique instead of trying to choose another racket. I'll be happy to answer any questions or take some pictures if you guys like.
Thanks for your review bro. Can you please give a rating or a comparison between the new Stern series as compared to the ever popular lethal range and the Tantrum 200? Cheers!
Unfortunately I've never played with the Lethal or Tantrum rackets. However, the seller told me that the Stern 100 shares the same frame as the Tantrum (which one, he never specified).
any recommentation on vh1800 Vs lethal70 Vs tantrum 200?how do u rate each of them?which is the best doubles racket out of all?waiting 4 replies as im planning to get one of them soon.
hi, have to trouble u again how does the stern compare to the nano 900 power white? I am searching the suitable single racquet in particular apacs.
Has anyone of you used stern 200 or 300 before? Can you give me any reviews? What is the market price?
May I know any different between Lethal 70 and lethal 60? which one is head heavier? and I can't find a 3U of lethal 60 in market, they only have 4U?
thanks bro so lethal 60 and 70 would probably be more suitable for singles then? unlike the 50 which is probably alright for both singles and doubles?
The frame of the Stern 100 is thinner than that of the Nano 900 Power White when you look at it from the side. It also supposedly has more "advanced materials", which lets it support up to 35lbs of tension. Stiffness wise, they seem about the same. So, in terms of playing feel, it's like the Nano 900 Power White but swings slightly faster. I haven't noticed any drop in power, but the faster swing speed and maneuverability has been much appreciated. It's my favorite racket so far.
wanting to try apacs badminton racket but need help always wanted to try apacs racket . im looking for something very flexible and light weight . any recommendation apacs fans?
