Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Any better alternative than the WD disqualfication?

Discussion in 'Olympics LONDON 2012' started by LazyBuddy, Aug 1, 2012.

  1. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,222
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    Ok, we all know what had happend in the WD event now. Like it or not, the damage is already done. Let's put the blame on the side...

    I wonder if say we are giving the choice make the decision, what's the better alternatives than simply disqualify all 8, and sub them with much less skilled players, which ruin the entire event.

    Personally, I prefer the following:

    1. Let the OG event continue as it it, but issue fine / ban (say 3 SS) for the players afterward. Yeah, I know a lot of ppl will not agree with this.

    2. Setup a special group for the 4 pairs, round robin again (or cross match, for time saving), and only 2 (or even 1) can survive out of the "penalty group". Then, sub 2 (or 3) pairs to make up the 4 pairs in QF.

    Personly, I like #2 better. This way, the 4 pairs will definitely fight to death, which brings some "make up" value for the event (definitely nail bitting, high quality matches), while serve the punishment as 50% or 75% will go home, and the survivor will have less fatigue and less recovery time, which means less chance to survive in the following rounds. This way, it will setup an example, but not totally kill the chance for the participants, and most importantly, keep up good standard of the event

    What do you think?:rolleyes:
     
    #1 LazyBuddy, Aug 1, 2012
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2012
  2. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    39,282
    Likes Received:
    550
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    there is no provision in the rule book to allow for fancy re-org like you suggested.

    it is either:

    - do nothing
    - reprimand
    - fine
    - disqualify

    and i believe disqualification is the only sensible way to go, given the magnitude of the violation and the outcry from fans and non-fans all over the world.

    and i am glad that BWF did the right thing.

    but on top of that, i hope BWF will in some way or manner admit that adopting the group match format is a really dumb idea.
     
  3. SibugiChai

    SibugiChai Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    4,127
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    YAB
    Location:
    malaysia
    I think those who won should not be disqualify... Because they didn't play their best yet win
     
  4. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,222
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    I agree that it's impossible to get a fancy re-org at the last minute. That's why I put up a big "IF" to begin with. Also, it's never wrong to have a "backup" plan from lessons learned for the future, right?
     
  5. thunder.tw

    thunder.tw Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    [0,0,0]
    As I've said in other thread it would have been best for the game to DQ the whole WD team for each of these nations.

    1. It will wake players up to the fact that they are responsible for their own actions and will have to quit hiding behind the "I was only following orders" defence.

    2. It will give the coaches pause when they are temped to behave in such a manner as they will have to face the players who's dreams they've destroyed by putting them in the position of having to make such a choice.
     
  6. Fan888

    Fan888 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    I like neither of your options. Why? Because the offenders can still potentially walk away with the medals after they've put the sport and the Olympic to shame.

    Unless you find a way to make sure they don't win any medal. Well, that is DQ.
     
  7. ph_leung

    ph_leung Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    I fix things
    Location:
    Canada
    3. Have all players replay the matches but with one change in the rules. Each point that a team loses, one player must remove one article of clothing (excluding shoes because that would just get too nasty). If you win one point, you get to replace that article. I guarantee you that the play will become very competitive. Worldwide viewers would increase to record levels. Sponsorship money will flow.
     
  8. thunder.tw

    thunder.tw Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    [0,0,0]
    Gross. But that would be one way to get me to cheer for that particular Chinese pair...... shudder.
     
  9. rexelus

    rexelus Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    canada
    my eyes will be glued to ctv's crappy live stream if that happens. more pixelated goodness
     
  10. AlanY

    AlanY Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,067
    Likes Received:
    171
    Location:
    England
    a slight twist to option 1 that I posted earlier

     
  11. Fan888

    Fan888 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    They should have a rematch where the players need to give money to a charity. The dollar amount will be determined by the number of points they lose.
     
  12. ph_leung

    ph_leung Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    I fix things
    Location:
    Canada
    Actually, I like #2 or the suggestion someone else made in another thread. The winner of the match gets to choose how they want to proceed. i.e. The the winners choose to have either themselves or the losing team match up next.

    With #1 a fine may not be that much of a deterrent if team orders are at play or larger monetary incentives to do so.
     
  13. OneToughBirdie

    OneToughBirdie Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,023
    Likes Received:
    114
    Occupation:
    engineer
    Location:
    icy cold place
    Dude, if you are talking about the CHN-KOR match, think carefully what you are asking for, you may regret it. Agree the KOR cutie may look great with less on or none on:p But the CHN pair, err...some kids may have recurring nightmare for the rest of their life:D
     
  14. LD rules!

    LD rules! Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    5,598
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Earth
    Why don't we just do a way with Women's doubles altogether? I'm surprised that so many people in the stadium were booing, can't imagine they would watch this over some of the other matches that were being played! :p
     
  15. jasonmarc

    jasonmarc Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    10,384
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    MALAYSIA
    Its the best way to deal with this problem no other alternatives...............
     
  16. madbad

    madbad Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    28,304
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    coming to a court near you...
    Brrrrrrrr... the thought...... go YY/WXL! :D

    Wouldn't mind seeing the Koreans get spanked though ;)
     
  17. Voltric

    Voltric Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Malaysia
    The damage has been done. Disqualification is the only way to go. Personally I would have preferred expulsion.
     
  18. demolidor

    demolidor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    9,825
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    @Hollanti
    What sponsors do you have in mind :D? In this poor choice of shots it looks like a wanted poster for mental ward escapees [​IMG]. And this is the pic the biggest newspaper here is using for the article :eek: ...

    Yu_Yang.jpg
     
    #18 demolidor, Aug 1, 2012
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2012
  19. Pakito

    Pakito Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,229
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    service consultant
    Location:
    Ipoh
    If there were bigger bosses higher up than IOC, I think the bosses should give IOC and BWF a tongue-lashing too. Dumb and dumber for former and latter respectively.
     
  20. madbad

    madbad Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    28,304
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    coming to a court near you...
    SIGH! What an advertisement for badminton. More like a front page headline for escaped criminals. :D
     

Share This Page