Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

AT-700 vs. AT-800, durability?

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by Midget_Boy, Sep 28, 2005.

  1. Midget_Boy

    Midget_Boy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    9
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    I've always thought of AT-700 and AT-800 OF/DF similar in terms of design and performance, differences such as colouring, frame design, doubles/singles play, and stiffness. Well I always overlooked the single grommet pass on AT-800, which supposedly gives it more durability, until now. Do the extra grommet holes really give more durability, when clashing to your partner's racquet, as Yonex advertising states, or is the difference between single grommet system and regular string system so small, it is hardly considered a new feature?

    Lookin' to get a new AT soon, more of a singles player, but often plays doubles, and can't go wrong with increased durability in games, :) .
     
  2. theasiandude88

    theasiandude88 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    349
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    student YAY!!!
    Location:
    Monterey Park
    i believe that the increase number of gourmets does not increase durability or much. i also believe that it does not give more durability.

    dont forget to put it into consideration that it is easier to break a racquet if tension is strung "too" high or strung incorrectly.
     
  3. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,372
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    DCBadminton Racket Developer
    Location:
    dcbadminton.net
    Don't know about the grommet holes but my general impression is the AT-800 is quite durable in terms of not breaking due to clashing/impact. However, the paint finish is quite easily chipped when you clash with another racket.
     
  4. Midget_Boy

    Midget_Boy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    9
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Yep, so all in all, the AT-800s durability is only increased marginally, if not lowered. I think I'll just settle with AT-700, it is cheaper, after all ;)
     
  5. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    Just curious, what is the difference between the AT800 DE and the AT700?
     
  6. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,372
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    DCBadminton Racket Developer
    Location:
    dcbadminton.net
    The AT-800 is designed for doubles while the AT-700 is designed for singles. You mentioned you play more singles, then go for the AT-700.
     
  7. jcl49

    jcl49 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Reading, UK
    Some pros use AT700 for doubles (Nova Widianto - Indonesian Mixed Doubles). Some pros use AT800of for singles (Sony Dwi Kuncoro - Indonesian Singles). It really depends on you style of play. If you don't yet have a style, then go for the cheaper option - At700. If you are worried about durability, then get the 3U versions.
     
    #7 jcl49, Sep 29, 2005
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2005
  8. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,372
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    DCBadminton Racket Developer
    Location:
    dcbadminton.net
    True but the pros can play with a wooden racket. :p

    Comparing the AT800-OF to the AT700 (tried real briefly), I felt the AT700 was slower for net play. The AT700 seemed a bit better for clearing and smashing, I felt I got more power out of it. But for returns, net play, I like my AT800-OF better. :)
     
  9. manduki

    manduki Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Canada, Mississauga
    my partner owned an AT 700 before and it was quite the stiffness. I found it very unforgiving and hard to generate power. The AT 800 OF is also a quick powerful racket but the best comprimise is apparently the AT 800 DE. The DE is one of the most forgiving rackets b Yonex and it seems to be the ideal choice.
     
  10. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,372
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    DCBadminton Racket Developer
    Location:
    dcbadminton.net
    I feel the AT800-OF is just right, for me. :D But I might have to pick-up one DE just in case I'm too tired to flex the OF. Thanks for the info.
     
  11. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    What is the balance on the 800 DE (whoever had the date sheet on it)?
     
  12. danielg

    danielg Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Philippines
    The AT800DE is classified as Headheavy - however it feels very light and fast (at least that was how it felt for me)
     
  13. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,372
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    DCBadminton Racket Developer
    Location:
    dcbadminton.net
    Dang, you're killing me. Now I must buy one. :p
     
  14. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    That definately gets my attention. However I'm still wondering which U you had?
     
  15. quik_silver

    quik_silver Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,163
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Toronto,Ontario
    Not too much difference..

    IMO..I think the 700 and 800 is around the same..I havent heard too much of ATs breaking *only the time when my friend broke his 800 from clash.* Other than that not too much difference..
     
  16. danielg

    danielg Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Philippines
    We all read how good technique is the key to improve one's game but I frimly believe having the right racquet goes a long long way in making the learning process fun. The AT800DE is powerful yet forgiving. It allows me to commit mistakes and yet it doesn't frustrate me because I made those mistakes, because of its forgiving properties, it encourages me to go on and be better because using it is fun ( I don't know of a better way to describe it :)). I am a complete newbie/beginner having played this game for a very short time but this racquet has helped me develop and gets me pumped up to see its full potential and the only way I can see its full potential is if I get better.

    My Racquet is 3UG5, I know a lot of people prefer the 4u version for doubles play but since I play singles too, I opted for the 3U. My friends have tried out my racquet and all commented on how good it felt and how nimble it is.

    Another benefit of this racquet that I can think of is that it was designed by Yones as a doubles racquet and thus in their website, it states that it was made more durable to withstand the head/racquet clashes that often occurs in a doubles game. I don't know how much if this is marketing hype but I have had a few of these clashes myself and the only damage I saw was a slight chip in the paint. I know others who uses At800 also and claims that it is quite durable within limits of course. So it does feel reassuring specially for me who can only afford to own one racquet at a time.
     
    #16 danielg, Sep 29, 2005
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2005
  17. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    In your opinion, what is the size on the sweet spot? Since you mention it has forgiving properties.

    For me, I maybe looking for it as long as the characters is similar to that of the Swing Power 900 SA which obtained new today (sold mine about 5 years ago) - went to the post office to pick it up. I like this racket because it's 81g, flexable, swing speed and mainly the "Swing Power" feel. The sweet spot on it large as well.
     
  18. hydrocyanic

    hydrocyanic Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2005
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    wasting my time
    Location:
    vancouver, canada
    i bought a at800de based on review from this site...

    my arm is hurting though

    so, its best to try it if possible before you buy one

    of cuz, my poor swinging technique helps on killing myself nicely

    *not saying this site is bad, its lightyears far from it, but everyone has a different taste to rackets, thats all

    might have been very annoying to people, but the reason i keep asking for alternative to yonex is b/c there isn't much review based on them or other factors, which give me insecurities having to spend another chunk of money to gamble its suitability with me, got to agree with having the right rracket isn't a small thing in badminton :)
     
  19. danielg

    danielg Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Philippines

    I don't really know how big the sweetspot is but I noticed that when hitting off-center shots and even frameshots it was more forgiving than when I was using the MP30.
     
  20. danielg

    danielg Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Philippines
    What string and string tension are you using? I am using BG80 stringed at 23lbs- so far so good.
     

Share This Page