Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Dissertation Proposal

Discussion in 'Techniques / Training' started by aw_starbuck, Feb 11, 2008.

  1. aw_starbuck

    aw_starbuck Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Sales Assistant
    Location:
    Bedford
    As my dissetation proposal i am intending on comparing the usage of visual display (from a video anlysis) and visual display from the on court environment and compare the differences in anticipation of shuttle landing position when returning the long serve. (It sounds like a mouthful but written up makes a lot more sense)

    Does anybody have any suggestions of what should be built into this investigation or anything that could potentially go wrong???

    Also, does anybody know where (in written context - i.e. badminton magazines, published articles, published books) i could find information on the most standard stance and position on court for returning the serve in singles???

    Thanks.
     
  2. silentheart

    silentheart Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    4,214
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    USA
    is this for your phd?:confused:
     
  3. aw_starbuck

    aw_starbuck Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Sales Assistant
    Location:
    Bedford
    no. it's for my undergrad dissertation!!!
     
  4. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    16,326
    Likes Received:
    50
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box

    First I should ask why do you want to do this comparison? i.e what value does this comparison have?

    Secondly, your methodology should try to minimise 'bias' which simply put is a systematic deviation from the truth.
     
  5. aw_starbuck

    aw_starbuck Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Sales Assistant
    Location:
    Bedford
    This comparison serves importance as the advanced cues demonstrated by the server allow the returner of serve to gain an awareness of where the long serve is to be placed and whether this serve is going in or out (Obviously if the serve is going long it would make sense to leave it to win the point!)

    By including the field-based experiment (on court) if there is no difference between the results of lab testing against field testing it would suggest that video demonstrations could be used as an effective teaching aid to introduce novices to lateral and depth constancies.

    How would you suggest minimising bias is possible within the framework of the experiment??

    Thanks.
     
  6. stumblingfeet

    stumblingfeet Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,121
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Ottawa
    What cues are you talking about? Determining the position of the high serve is a result of watching the shuttle trajectory immediately and continuously after service. In this case, you have so much time that cues from the server don't matter at all.
     
  7. aw_starbuck

    aw_starbuck Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Sales Assistant
    Location:
    Bedford
    Nope, the advanced cues leading up to the striking of the shutte cock. The flight trajectory will be occluded in the field - experiment using visors and in the lab by occluding the vision at the point of contact with the shttle. So we are talking about pre-contact advanced cues!!!!
     
  8. stumblingfeet

    stumblingfeet Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,121
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Ottawa
    What I mean is that with duration of the shuttle flight in the long serve, the importance of pre-contact cues is minimal. The player returning the serve is not under any time pressure to decide where the shuttle is going; he has plenty of time to look around and decide what to do.
     
  9. Loopy

    Loopy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    LuckyTown
    By all means, those "advanced cues" cannot predict or as you say make the receiver "anticipate" where the shuttle is going to land by observing the server and its racket, most notably at point of contact.
    Because you are ignoring the most essential factor: the shuttle.
    What will you do in case of a fast shuttle or a slower one?

    Second, how can the receiver possibly differentiate the racket angle at point of contact? Will the long serve be a high deep one or a more attacking flat flick serve ? What about servers having different acceleration, and accelerating at the very last moment?
    A server can make radically different long serves and still make the shuttle land at the same spot every time.

    Those cues may have an impact on anticipating whether the server is making a long serve or a short serve. Then again, advanced players have deceptive serves, making the read even more difficult.
     

Share This Page