Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

HARIBITO American Stringing Method

Discussion in 'Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools' started by Gemcat, Jul 31, 2009.

  1. Gemcat

    Gemcat Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    922
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Airport Employee
    Location:
    Canada, BC, GVA
    Has anyone heard of such method and where can I try this stringing style in Vancouver?

    Thanks!
     
  2. ilovedude

    ilovedude Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    There
    Have fun and enjoy,
    You don't need to know Japanese to understand the instruction.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Gemcat

    Gemcat Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    922
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Airport Employee
    Location:
    Canada, BC, GVA
    Wow....I don't understand a thing in there....Haha....I don't string my racquets either because I don't have the tools and leisure....:(
     
  4. Pete LSD

    Pete LSD Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    6,303
    Likes Received:
    11
    Occupation:
    Soul Searching
    Location:
    Canada
    It's just a one piece method with the tie offs at the top and bottom cross.
     
  5. Dreamzz

    Dreamzz Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
    Messages:
    6,130
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    London & Penang
    any thoughts on how this compares to yonex's recommended stringing pattern?
     
  6. ilovedude

    ilovedude Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    There
    Gemcat, I can do it for you. Main & cross the same tension.
    Someone did compared this to YY (both 1 pc & 2pcs) and they said tension retention is the best and the feel is also the best.
     
  7. silentheart

    silentheart Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    4,214
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    USA
    Interesting. My Japanese was a little rough. Took me 2 min of reading to figure out the stringing pattern. 1) it is not the traditional main 11 then main 10 as YY suggested. It is doing main 10 then main 11. 2) after tensioning all the mains, it start from middle and 1 side up and 1 side down.
    My question to ilovedude is did you tried it and find any difference? I prefer not to take other's word at it's face value. Also, thank you because I just learned something new today.
     
  8. ilovedude

    ilovedude Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    There
    No, same as you I only learned about this Gosen way yesterday. I remember I asked this question (different way) a few months back and got no answer. In Asia particular in China they have lot of different theories about stringing. My main concern to start with this is the main and cross is the same tension and those guru here are almost lean to the +10% rule. I don't have any racket to string right now but for sure my next string job would be with this.
     
  9. ray_mond

    ray_mond Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
    this is interesting. i took my cab 8 to be strung at yo's in toronto, and this guy has an amazing reputation for stringing. I came back, and for the longest time until now, I didn't know what stringing pattern he did.

    I have to admit though, after nearly a year and a half, the cab 8 strings still perform better than ever, barely any tension lost. Im curious to try this on my Ti-10s.. Will post results in a couple of days..

    I'm eager to try this for myself as well now. Do the traditional methods still apply? Such as +10% on cross and the need for progressional stringing?
     
  10. illusionistpro

    illusionistpro Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    www.badstrings.com
    interesting pattern, looks like a 50/50 1 piece pattern. String mains straight out from middle to outside, and then one side does the upper crosses, and other does lower crosses. I cant tell right now if this is good, but I wouldnt think so since you are putting a lot of stress on the weakest part of the crosses right away, and increasing the stress every additional cross. I guess I could try this on a panda power ultra...I think a tennis around the world pattern would be better.

    I suppose one benefit is all the tie offs are on the extreme ends, leaving your a more consistent stringbed
     
    #10 illusionistpro, Aug 3, 2009
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2009
  11. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    39,284
    Likes Received:
    551
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    this is what Pete also referred as the shuttle-house pattern.

    i don't know if the Japanese instruction says this:

    there are 6 cross going down, and 15 cross going up. another trick to this patten is when transitioning from main to cross, string downward 4 strings (green string on the diagram), and then up 7 strings (blue), then down 2 strings (green) to complete the bottom, and then up 8 strings (green) to complete the top.

    i haven't tried it myself but will next time i break a string.

    the next question then is. why not go one step further? instead of starting the cross from 2/3 down start it bang in the middle? that's the Luxis stringing pattern (with 4 knots) and Luxis stringing feels very good.
     
  12. silentheart

    silentheart Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    4,214
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    USA
    I would not start the cross in the middle. The reason id you will have too much slack from main transition to cross on the side of the frame. Extra stress put on the sides. Also you waste about 5 cm of string if you start crosses from the middle
     
  13. illusionistpro

    illusionistpro Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    www.badstrings.com
    If you did 2 piece you could start dead middle, but if you do 1 piece you gotta just start where you are.
     
  14. silentheart

    silentheart Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    4,214
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    USA
    I think the issue is this string pattern is for 1 piece. Or else you might be looking at a 3 pieces method...
     
  15. Pete LSD

    Pete LSD Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    6,303
    Likes Received:
    11
    Occupation:
    Soul Searching
    Location:
    Canada
    Just add 10% to the bottom cross before tie off and 15% to the top cross before tie off.

    I still prefer two piece top down . . .
     
  16. sihker

    sihker Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Estonia
    Could somebody draw a nice schema of this "Luxis" stringing method? This one looks interesting, I will try this Gosen method out once I get some spare racquets to string.
     
  17. coachgary

    coachgary Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    uk
    The other thing to note I think is that those who have swivel clamps will need a couple of flying clamps as well. Cos you'll end up with two string tensioned at the same side in transition from mains to crosses.

    How much extra would you need for the long side main to finish the 16 crosses compared to the 6 on the short side?
     
  18. ilovedude

    ilovedude Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    There
    I did one yesterday. I prestretched the string and pre-weave it. Since I don't have fixed clamp on my machine, I have to pull the first cross of the short side and clamp the string from outside the frame then I pull the first cross from the long side and clamp both first string with 2 clamps inside and work the long side all the way up. Pretty smooth operation, 21 lbs main and cross. The finished shape surprisingly looks like the un-strung frame. I like it.
     
  19. ilovedude

    ilovedude Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    There
    You pull one at a time, for those machines have fixed clamps you simply pull the first cross of the short side and release the fixed clamp from the main and clamp the first cross and vise versa. I guess I will buy couple more flying clamps in order to do a better job.
    By the way, for the short side I need 6 1/4 racket length to complete (a loop left @ L1 & L2 for pulling)
    I don't understand why sihker has to refer this one as "Luxis" ???
     
  20. Sealman

    Sealman Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,244
    Likes Received:
    17
    Occupation:
    Racquet Collector
    Location:
    Singapore

Share This Page