Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

RAW question

Discussion in 'Badminton Photography' started by Cheung, Nov 17, 2006.

  1. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    16,147
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box
    A simple question:)

    When you use a RAW converter, what is the aim?

    In PS, you can take the RAW image and then put layers on it, then convert it into another file format.

    I read DPP is also a RAW converter (and for some people more pleasing than PS). But DPP has a limited number of functions compared to PS.

    So does that mean that editing a photo in DPP is a 2 stage process? i.e. Do some white balance, exposure stuff in DPP and then transfer the file to PS? And what file should be used? TIFF?
     
  2. red00ecstrat

    red00ecstrat Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,985
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    (Full Time) Coolie. (Part Time) Photojournalist.
    Location:
    Hong Kong S.A.R. China
    i m using photoshop 6 and photoshop cs2. in fact with photoshop cs2 u can deal with any file format.
    i would say just do whatever u can to tune your picture with that raw converter. after all, fine tune them with photoshop.
    as for which format. it doesn't really matter cheung. coz photoshop can handle all of them. but if u are a very serious photographer. just save it to either tiff or eps format.
     
    #2 red00ecstrat, Nov 17, 2006
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2006
  3. Aaronmd

    Aaronmd Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    I use Adobe light room to do basic adjustments and do the rest of the heavy processing in Photoshop CS2. I save all of my final images as 16bit .tiffs
     
  4. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
  5. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    16,147
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box
    I've just been messing around with Lightroom. The results look pretty good, especially with some underexposed jpegs I have.
     
  6. Ekinox06210

    Ekinox06210 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    France
    I'm using DXO optics pro for RAW processing, because it's also an intelligent software. I does a lot of things compared to other raw sorfwares.

    I do other other stuffs in PS after that.
     
  7. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    38,208
    Likes Received:
    278
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    yup. Lightroom is my main flow now. version 1.1 is even better, much faster and stable compared to 1.0.
     
  8. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,372
    Likes Received:
    42
    Occupation:
    DCBadminton Racket Developer
    Location:
    dcbadminton.net
    Dang, new software (for me), must do research...

    Anyone, why Lightroom over PShop? Thanks!
     
  9. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    16,147
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box
    I tried it because of the interest surrounding it.

    It has inbuilt noise reduction ability which is really cool. It handles exposure really well. I have a picture which was really important to me. For that picture, the camera messed up and I ended up with a picture 2 stops underexposed with obvious noise (taken at ISO1600). It was a jpeg meaning less ability to manipulate. I just got it printed after using Lightroom and the result was unexpectedly good.

    Bear in mind I'm only a simple person so these small things make a big difference to me.
     

Share This Page