Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Rules Question

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by eggroll, Nov 19, 2004.

  1. eggroll

    eggroll Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    sales
    Location:
    calgary
    We have a gentleman at our club that strings raquets for members and in the sweetspot of the raquet he laces in a square pattern a piece of thin guage string to keep the strings in place. I think this a rules violation whereas the strings must be interlaced in a criss cross pattern and the face of the raquet string should be consistent. What do you guys think of my interpetation? I know I could just e mail my friends in Tokyo but thought it might be interesting to hear your comments.
     
  2. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    12
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room

    I know the guy u r talking about. I'm not sure about the IBF rules but i do know that it affects string performance. At first he charges 10$ extra for that weaving, later 5$, i don't know how much extra he charges now. Some people fell for it because they think they got some special advantage over regular string job but those advantages he claimed haven't been proven nor have i seem the benefits as claimed
     
  3. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    I'll lay the IBF Smackdown :p

    The relevant law would seem to be
    4.2.1
    The stringed area shall be flat and consist of a pattern of crossed strings either alternately interlaced or bonded where they cross. the stringing pattern shall be generally uniform, and, in particular, not less dense in the centre than in any other area.


    If the extra string is like the border of a square, around the centre,
    I would guess it is not legal.
    (based on the idea that the stringing pattern would be less dense in the centre than in the area with the extra string)

    If the extra string is filling the whole of a square,
    I would guess it might be legal.
     
  4. eggroll

    eggroll Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2002
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    sales
    Location:
    calgary
    Thta's the way I interpet it.
     
  5. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    12
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room
    have u considered being a lawyer ;) I think u would do really well

    I think if one push it to the letters of the law, it's illegal, that goes to lots of other stringers weaving extra strings on top and bottom of racket.
     
    #5 cooler, Nov 19, 2004
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2004
  6. JChen99

    JChen99 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,045
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Realtor
    Location:
    Coquitlam
    any of you got pictures of this? Not sure wut I picture in my head is rite
     

Share This Page