Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Shifting from head light to head heavy

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by BadGone, Nov 19, 2007.

  1. BadGone

    BadGone Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    LYON FRANCE
    HI Guys,

    I'm an intermediate player, currently using 2 head light raquets one of xhich is the N6000 (24lb, BG66).

    My game getting a little bit better, more attacking but still lacking smash power, I would like to shift to a more attacking raquet but not extra stiff.

    Do you have any recommendation ?

    Many thx
     
  2. mel_baddie

    mel_baddie Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    germany
    i hope more people will answer to this thread. i am using NS 6000 as well mainly for doubles as it is a fast racket and the power is not bad too but i am suffering a bit with this racket in singles. not enough power to really pressure the opponent.
     
  3. mel_baddie

    mel_baddie Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    germany
    hi,
    i think i can understand your situation. NS 6000 is a flexible racket but it does feel medium to me. :)
    anyway.. maybe you should not go for such a drastic change from headlight to head heavy.

    i think it would be good if you find a racket that is even balance. there are quite a few from yonex such as MP45 or Arcsaber 7 or MP 29 light, MP21. the last 2 are not high end rackets but who's to say they cannot produce enough power?

    i personally am choosing between MP 45 or Arcsaber 7 as my next racket. both rackets are medium stiff. hope this helps.

     
  4. UncleFester

    UncleFester Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Somewhere over the rainbow.
    Try the at500, it's about even balance, and can produce a good amount of power. Not a though racquet to handle. See if you can demo it.
     
  5. UnknownX

    UnknownX Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Irvine CA, 92617 USA
    If you want to try, you could put lead tape or some sort of tape on the top of your racket. It makes the head heavier, and you should still be use to the weight of your racket. The extra weight of the tape should make your smashes better while it won't affect your movements that much. if you decided to switch rackets, then it might take some time to adapt to it.
     
  6. UncleFester

    UncleFester Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2007
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Somewhere over the rainbow.
    I'm suprised no one has tried to tie a brick to the head of their racquets. That would give you the headheavies racquet in the world.
    Think of how insane your smashes would be.
    Defense would be a bit lacking, but that's not an issue, is it?
     
  7. Fengwei

    Fengwei Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Well as he isn't complaining about doubles... maybe he should try it out UncleFester. :D
     
  8. chrishin

    chrishin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    somewhere in NA
    using ns 5k but i've got new ti 10 comming which is little head heavier and much more stiff. i'll tell you by this sunday
     
  9. mel_baddie

    mel_baddie Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    germany
    too bad i they are not selling any ti-10 here in germany. :-( would love to try that out.
     
  10. Fengwei

    Fengwei Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Netherlands
  11. Phuong

    Phuong Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    u can try using teh new armotec 700, it stiff and well balance. good for both att and def
     
  12. mel_baddie

    mel_baddie Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    germany
    i think you are the first to say that AT 700 is well balanced.. haha:D:D


     
  13. Athelete1234

    Athelete1234 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Canada
    AT700 is a rock compared to Nanospeeds.Try the NS9000S, or AT900T.
     
  14. NoName1225

    NoName1225 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco/Davis California
    why tie a brick to your racket when it can easily swing back and emasculate you? Use a frozen turkey, it's big and round, and people will be scared of you. But watch out if it drips cuz like you'll slip.
     
  15. chickenpoodle

    chickenpoodle Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,237
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Alberta, Canada
    theres many variables in producing power, and while some will say balance of the racquet will play a role, i think its quite minor.
    theres lots of players who use pretty head light racquets and still produce massive power with them, since ultimately the player makes the power, not the racquet, right?

    have you tried various different strings and tensions to see if it might bump up the power a bit?

    i don't want to mention it here, since we're in the equipment forums, and not general/technique, but theres also the option of playing around and trying out different stuff with your stroke technique a bit which might in the end, turn out to be a more rewarding/enlightening and much cheaper alternative.

    i think a fully frozen turkey through and through will still hurt you just as much as a brick. and worse, it'll put an even bigger dent in your ego than any brick can do. :D
     
    #15 chickenpoodle, Nov 20, 2007
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2007
  16. BennyC

    BennyC Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    N/A
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Make that the second! XD I really do find it perfect in terms of balance and def/off is easy to pull off as well -____________-;;
     
  17. Athelete1234

    Athelete1234 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Canada
    I too find that it's well balanced... for me. For anybody else, and on the technical side of things, having a 310mm balance point even with overgrip is just seriously head heavy compared to other racquets.
     
  18. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    22,050
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room
    are you Mel B?:p

    i think Arcsaber 7 is closer to a head light racket.
    prolly close to your old ns6000
     

Share This Page