Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Some doubts to clear...AT800DE & AT800OF

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by lightsmash, Apr 2, 2006.

  1. lightsmash

    lightsmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Target board
    Location:
    SG and MY
    Hey guys,

    I was browsing thru badmintonalley just now and it shows that the only difference between at800of and at800de is that at800de is even balanced wherelse at800of is head heavy balanced. is that right?
    if thats not right, can anyone tell me the difference? cos at800de feels head heavy to me. :eek:
     
  2. TrunkZ69

    TrunkZ69 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Bay Area
    The OF is much more haed heavy and stiffer thant he DE.
     
  3. blinan8088

    blinan8088 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Programmer
    Location:
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    I think AT800 DE is head heavy, but it is less head heavy than AT800 OF.

    Regarding stiffness, IMO they are quite similar, or there is only slight difference.

    AT800 DE has an aerodynamic frame.
     
  4. blinan8088

    blinan8088 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Programmer
    Location:
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Another thing which I'd like to add.

    In badmintonalley.com website, both AT800 OF and DE use UHMG/Ultimum Ti in the shaft. However, refering to Yonex website, both use HMG/Ultimum Ti for the shaft (*not* UHMG). Only the frame part uses UHMG.
     
  5. lightsmash

    lightsmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Target board
    Location:
    SG and MY
    thanks for all the comments guys. :D
     
  6. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,514
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    Looks like the particular Yonex and BadmintonAlley are both wrong. I am looking at the Official Yonex 2006 catalog and here is what it saids.

     
    #6 Matt, Apr 2, 2006
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2006
  7. blinan8088

    blinan8088 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Programmer
    Location:
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  8. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,514
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    Yup, the JP site is right. I thought one of the Yonex countries had it wrong - I checked US site but they updated it very recently that it looks like the JP site which you linked.

    Sorry my bad, I mis-read your initial post, I thought it said the whole racket is either UHMG or HMG!
     
  9. blinan8088

    blinan8088 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Programmer
    Location:
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    No problem, Matt :)

    Btw, I have emailed BadmintonAlley.com as you suggested. I hope they can make some changes in their website to match Yonex specification.
     
  10. lightsmash

    lightsmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Target board
    Location:
    SG and MY
    Just bought my new toy!!! and wanted to share my joy.:D
    [​IMG]
     
  11. Hagane

    Hagane Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Transport Consultant
    Location:
    Melbourne
    That looks like a new AT bag.

    I have the plain looking one :p
     
  12. lightsmash

    lightsmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Target board
    Location:
    SG and MY
    is that the official AT bag that comes with AT?
    I'm not very sure, but thats what the boss told me. :eek:
     
  13. bluejeff

    bluejeff Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    TW
    Wow, I didn't know the AT series bag also have the stitched version.

    So, People can now collect CAB, AT, MP, and Ti stitched bags. Very nice collection after the foam bags collection.
     
  14. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,514
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
  15. lightsmash

    lightsmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Target board
    Location:
    SG and MY
    I was told that the bag I had belongs to the older batches of AT.
    the new AT comes with a different(which i think would be the bag Matt has shown)
    mine didnt even come with a hologram sticker.:eek:
     
  16. lightsmash

    lightsmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Target board
    Location:
    SG and MY
    new versus the old

    [​IMG]
     
  17. fishmilk

    fishmilk Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    931
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Toronto
    When I got my AT500 in Canada, I got the bag Matt showed. In HK, they ran out of musclepower bags, so they gave me the stitched AT bag. I think its the difference in countries.
     

Share This Page