Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

steep smashes vs flatter smashes

Discussion in 'Techniques / Training' started by checkthemc, May 8, 2005.

  1. checkthemc

    checkthemc Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    None/Student
    Location:
    San Jose, CA (Leland)
    By flatter smashes, I dont mean exactly flat, but its higher than a steep smash. From what I hear, steep smashes are better, but how come more people return my steep smashes (which are faster than my flatter smashes) more often than my flatter smashes?
     
  2. chungsquared

    chungsquared New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    bayarea, CA
    maybe because the flatter smash is going more towards the chest and face? i know i have a harder time defending smashes that go in that direction. maybe thats just me
     
  3. cappy75

    cappy75 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2002
    Messages:
    3,508
    Likes Received:
    11
    Occupation:
    Depot Support Representative
    Location:
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    They got your steep smash because you didn't place them properly and your opponents were expecting them. If you couldn't block a high smash, that's probably because your racquet's down when you're in no-man's land:D.
     
  4. fanatico

    fanatico Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Singapore
    for doubles especially, flat smashes to the body are very effective. however, if the receiver is fast enough, it is usually easier to push back a flatter smash than a steeper one of the same power. for doubles, steep smashes may be to a certain extent not as effective as the receiver has room to swing his racquet and return the smashes. for singles however, because of the large space required to cover, it may be more difficult to retrieve than flatter smashes as the retriever needs to move fast enough to take it while a tall retriever can intercept the flatter smashes. in conclusion, you cannot say which type of smash is better. you need to a mix of them to instill variety in your play.
     
  5. Azwok

    Azwok Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    UK, Surrey
    Agreed. In a mixed doubles match a while back between Robertson and Emms and a pair from Denmark, I forget their names, Robertson kept smashing very flat at the head and upper chest area of the lady on the opposing team. Sometimes the smash would be quite high, about a foot above the net when it passed, started to look almost like a low drive and she was having great difficulty in returning it and in the end got very frustrating (I think Robertson and Emms lost the match anyway).
     
  6. Yodums

    Yodums Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    I think it depends on the scenario. If your opponents have the ability to drive the bird really well, then I don't think flat smashes would work too well because they could drive it really fast, giving you hardly any time to recover.
     

Share This Page