Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Substitute for bg 65 at 24lbs

Discussion in 'Badminton String' started by ChocoChipWaffle, Jun 20, 2005.

  1. ChocoChipWaffle

    ChocoChipWaffle Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    I have mp 100 and i strung it bg 65@22lbs. however, i tried my friend's mp 100 which is strung with bg 65@24lbs, and i liked his much better. That's why i wanted it strung that way, but my stringer doesn't want to string anything above 23 lbs. So, can anyone recommend me a string, where if the string is strung at 22-23lbs, it will feel and perform similarly to bg 65@24lbs?

    p.s. plz, don't comment on anything like how my stringer is incomptent, and that 24lbs is nothing a GOOD stringer can't do, and that i should get a new stringer. I already know that a good stringer can string a racket upto 28lbs. ANd yes, i already know alot of other stringers who can string it at that tension. Thank you.
     
  2. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,243
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    1. Go for another reputable stringer, who willing to go 24lb.

    2. Try thinner string (i.e. BG85, BG80, etc), however, durability and cost might be an issue.
     
  3. Shuttlebugs

    Shuttlebugs Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sydney
    BG85 is the way to go. Good luck.
     
  4. ToMitch

    ToMitch Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Quezon City, Philippines
    Someone once told me that when you use titanium coated string its tension would feel 2lbs more than what it was originally strung with.

    Assuming the above statement is true, BG65ti @ 22lbs should suit your needs.
     
  5. winstonchan

    winstonchan Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    CBO (Chief Babysitting Officer)
    Location:
    Bed
    Assuming competent stringing techique. Thicker strings require higher tension to get the same repulsion power as thinner strings, and vice versa, thinner strings don't require as high tension to give the same repulsion power. Try BG-68Ti or BG-85 at 22-23 lbs. This should perform close to your requirement, though if you can get BG-68Ti or BG-85 to 24lbs, that would be even better. Give it a go.
     
  6. jsunsun

    jsunsun Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2002
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Toronto/Richmond Hill
    bg66 feel tighter than other strings, while still has arguably the best repulsion power among all yonex strings. from my experience, relative to bg66, bg68ti feels very lose at same tension, probably because it's a very "slippery"(very little friction where the cross and main strings make contact) string, thus feels more lose when hitting shuttles.
     
  7. Kamikaze

    Kamikaze Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Bay Area
    i would go with bg68ti at 23lbs, but thats my own preference, give it a try if you'd like. if u play with plastic i wouldn't reccomend bg85 or those thinner strings since it will snap very easily.
     
  8. Wong8Egg

    Wong8Egg Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
    23lbs and 24lbs is not a HUGE differences. If you insist, simply go and look for another stringer.
     
  9. Neosakai

    Neosakai Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Unemployed =(
    Location:
    Richmond Hill
    If you read his p.s... He explained why he's sticking with this stringer.

    I suggest you try out other strings. Like some people said above, try thinner strings.


    By the way where do you live Choco? My stringer also doesn't wanna go above 23lb
     
  10. Wong8Egg

    Wong8Egg Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
    If you read his post again, he is looking for something perform similarly to bg 65@24lbs, and my suggestion is BG65@23.
     
  11. Neosakai

    Neosakai Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Unemployed =(
    Location:
    Richmond Hill
    Sry, I was referring to this....
     
  12. ChocoChipWaffle

    ChocoChipWaffle Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    ook, someppl might be confused why i'm not changing stringer...

    and lol no, it's NOT because i am the stringer that i keep calling incomeptent, it's my good friend, and he has strung my racket for a few years...

    alright, i'll be honest, i'm not willing to change stringers because of FRIENDSHIP and LOYALTY only, but he's the nearest and cheapest stringer i can find, and i'm too lazy lol:p
     
  13. Neosakai

    Neosakai Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Unemployed =(
    Location:
    Richmond Hill
    Hmm.... I have a question out of curiousity.... If you're friends with the stringer, for what reason will he not do racquets over 23lb? Is it because he is afraid of accidents?
     
  14. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,243
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    Well, reputation for a stringer is fairly important, especially if he makes a living on it. The higher the tension, the more often a string will snap faster, and the more risk for the racket. Since ppl tend to blame the stringers w/o even think twice, some stringers tend to be conservative to "protect" themselves. :cool:
     
  15. winstonchan

    winstonchan Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    CBO (Chief Babysitting Officer)
    Location:
    Bed
    Quite agree to this. The stringer was playing safe and do not wish to damage the "MP-100". Really you gotta be a very competent stringer to string rackets to very high tension. It requires experiences and techniques.
     
  16. red00ecstrat

    red00ecstrat Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,985
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    (Full Time) Coolie. (Part Time) Photojournalist.
    Location:
    Hong Kong S.A.R. China
    most likely the stringer doesn't want to take the risk of breaking the racket. but it should be ok for most of the racket which's strung at 23 or 24 lbs.
     

Share This Page