Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Two different Yonex Charts

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by verilog, Jul 12, 2006.

  1. verilog

    verilog New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. TrunkZ69

    TrunkZ69 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Bay Area
    one uses the cab20 as the middle ground racket, while the other uses a diff one i believe, cab 20 F. just a possibiltiy
     
  3. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,049
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    EU
    difference lies inw ich 'factors' they rate. in the first it's 'attacking/defensive' and 'solid/soft feeling' (I think)
    and the second is 'power/control' and 'singles/doubles' on the axis.

    so by chart two old the mp100 is a powerfull singles racket without much control. (highly subjective)
    chart two states: powerfull/attacking racket with a solid feeling. less subjective.
     
  4. bluejeff

    bluejeff Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    TW
    The factors and the scales are different. That's why.
     
  5. EastDevil

    EastDevil Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    What job?
    Location:
    Singapore
    That's because they are really two DIFFERENT charts, boy.
     
  6. twobeer

    twobeer Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    4,000
    Likes Received:
    11
    Occupation:
    computer
    Location:
    Sweden
    hmmm...

    So according to the Yonex Charts NS8000 is more "powerful" than AT700 and MP100 but less "Attacking" ?!?!? :eek: :eek: :eek:
     
  7. DivingBirdie

    DivingBirdie Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    971
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Singapore
    would be good if someone could translate the axes for us
     
  8. forrestyung

    forrestyung Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    905
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Salesman
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Scale? If it is really the factor, why do AT800DE, AT800OF, NS7000 and MP90 move far away from their origanal locations?
     
  9. vze22jf9

    vze22jf9 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Palo Alto, CA
    I think jerby might have accidentally reversed the descriptions of the two charts. It's the 2nd chart (vertical scale) that is offense vs. defense oriented.
     
  10. bluejeff

    bluejeff Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    Developer
    Location:
    TW
    Because two graphs have different sample sets (rackets), and that would change the scale by ratio in theory.

    Also, the factors on the graph are for "users-orientation." I don't think Yonex means the rackets exclusively.

    For example, if you like to smash, then you might want to get something like MP100, NS9000...etc as those are designed to aid those type of players. The graph doesn't necessary mean NS9000 or etc have absolutely more firepower over others.
     
  11. twobeer

    twobeer Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    4,000
    Likes Received:
    11
    Occupation:
    computer
    Location:
    Sweden
    But if NS8000 has more power (according to graph 2 than MP100 or AT700.. I find it very strange strange why AT700 and MP100 would be ratedd to be more suited/designed for offensive/smash play (graph 1)...

    To be honest I think these types of graphs are pretty useless and seems very "subjective" to me..
     
  12. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,049
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    EU
    subjective to marketing you mean:p , and less-frequent updating.

    "when addign the ns8k two things could've happened: "meh, just put it on top" or "how are we going to promote a new series when we clearly state it's not as 'powerfull' as the previous ones?"
     
  13. forrestyung

    forrestyung Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    905
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Salesman
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    But refer to Cab 20, it is still in the middle, even the sample set is different with a different scale, would a racket from more flex become more stiff than Cab 20, defensive oriented become to offensive oriented when compare with Cab 20?? I can understand the movement within one side, but I cannot understand why a racket is moved to another side of axis..... if the axis are constant.

    Is there any Japanese speaker can help??
     
  14. chungg

    chungg Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2003
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    New York City
    There is no moving, they are two differenet charts, that's all.. In the first chart the vertical axe is about power/control, and in the second chart it's offensive/defensive. You can't compare two different charts. And nonetheless NS 8000 can be less powerful than AT700 but more offensive than AT700. Who told you powerful and offensive are the same thing?
     
  15. forrestyung

    forrestyung Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    905
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Salesman
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Thanks for the explaination!!:)
     
  16. twobeer

    twobeer Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    4,000
    Likes Received:
    11
    Occupation:
    computer
    Location:
    Sweden
    To me, Yonex (and others) marketing speak has not really made any clear distinction between "power"-rating and "offensiveness"-rating..

    If the characteristics of a potentially more powerful racket (long, head-heavy, stiff) isn't more "offensive".. Then please let us know your (or Yonex) definition of an "offensive" racket (and also what characteristics you think a defensive racket has)..

    I am very pussled how a racket could be more offensive but less powerful, or vice versa, Designed for the control/defensive-player but more powerful, than an "attack"-model???

    /T
     
    #16 twobeer, Jul 14, 2006
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2006
  17. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,049
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    EU
    well, it's not the vertical axis that changed....only a bit 'updated' (as in: yonex realsied the ns8k misplacement)

    the horizontal axis chaged from "doubles-singles" to "soft feeling-solid feeling"

    mathematically: the new chart shows a line that basically resembles the formula Y=X. roughly...wich basically means a rackets are generally just as powerfull as they are 'solid' on impact.
     

Share This Page