Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

When choosing racquet: augment or complement?

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by Capnx, Jul 12, 2009.

  1. Capnx

    Capnx Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    when choosing a racquet, should a person choose one that augments their strengths or complements their weaknesses?

    for example, if a person is an aggresive/power player, should he/she get a racquet that adds additional power and strength, or should he/she get a racquet that may lack power (b/c he's already got lots of power) but has extra control and defence?
     
  2. jymbalaya

    jymbalaya Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United States
    its all about comfort/feel, etc imo. if a person is a power player, they will be it with practically any racket they choose. the racket they choose is the one they feel most comfortable with. i have seen players could smash harder with a NS9K than with a AT700 before. the reason they chose the NS9K is because it felt better to them.
     
  3. Gemcat

    Gemcat Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    932
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Airport Employee
    Location:
    Canada, BC, GVA
    If a player is good at attacking, he/she should strengthens that aspect instead of covering the weakness. Like you would want double the attack rather than having some attack and some defense. Because if you choose a racquet that will cover up your defense but weakens your attack, you actually lost that bit attack, making you less threatening on court.
     
  4. BoyGenius

    BoyGenius Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Employee
    Location:
    Singapore
    Attacking is the best defense :); so I would go for a racket which can further promotes my strength and style of playing.

    If you are an attack-minded player, you wouldn't like to be in situation where you need to win the game by ball placement or getting point by solid defending and force the opponent to make errors. You would be continuously terrorising the opponent with attacks in every possible angles. As such, most of the time, you will need the racket to go along with your playing style.
     
  5. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,243
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    I think it depends.

    If a player is way superior in 1, and extremely lacking in another, then complement makes sense. If a player is only slightly better in one than the other, then make the good to be better gives him/her the upper edge.

    Overall, it really depends on the player. Also, there's a lot of racket does not go either extreme. If you have a way to use it, it may actually benefit on both.
     
  6. krisss

    krisss Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,079
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    ? ?The Moon? ?
    I think it really does depend on the players choice.

    Some people who are attacking players , still don't enjoy playing with the Armrotec 700.

    Just choose a racket you like and that helps your game. You don't need to be TO technical about it.
     
  7. WhiteInk

    WhiteInk Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Growing business
    Location:
    Singapore
    if certain part is your weakness, then you should train up that area.
    For example, if you are poor in defence, having a defensive racket will not improve your defence.
    Same for attack, if your smashes are poor, having a attacking racket will not improve your smash.

    So IMHO, I feel a racket will improve your weakness unless you are a very complete player, which means even your weakness is your strength in a average player's eye.

    Having said that,
    If you are a complete player, then i would go for a racket that suit my style. so if i'm a attacking player, i will buy an attacking racket, if a more control player, i would go for a control racket, this is to make sure the selling point of my racket is fully utilise.
    :)
     
    #7 WhiteInk, Jul 13, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2009
  8. Pisthetairos

    Pisthetairos Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    USA
    I agree with whiteink; I'm not quite sure I believe a racket on it's own can make up for a player's weaknesses. Just like in any other trade/sport/ etc. etc. I wouldn't hand my younger brother a box of Prismacolors in the hopes that he might draw better, crayolas more than suit his technical skills. On the other hand, if he showed a proficiency in color blending,perhaps I would. Tools can only do so much tohelp improve your skills. Better to use them to complment your strengths than gamble on magically improving your weaknesses.
     
    #8 Pisthetairos, Jul 14, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2009
  9. thejym

    thejym Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Diego
    My thoughts exactly.
     

Share This Page