Thanks for visiting us!

Badminton Central is a free community for fans of badminton! If you find anything useful here please consider registering to see more content and get involved with our great community users, it takes less than 15 seconds! Everybody is welcome here.

Click here for a FREE account!

Why repulsiveness and repulsion?

Discussion in 'Badminton String' started by Cheung, Jun 26, 2013.

  1. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    16,153
    Likes Received:
    11
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box
    Here I am at my desk. I see the packet of a set of strings here. The description has the word 'repulsion'.

    Why do we use this homonym? Is there a better term?
     
  2. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,096
    Likes Received:
    85
    Occupation:
    Stringer, Panda reseller, whatever else comes up
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    What's wrong with "power"? Appeals to everybody:).
     
  3. SSSSNT

    SSSSNT Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Here
    Well let me explain why must we use that homonym. In the first place the shuttle cock is disgusting indeed what with it being made of chicken feathers. Plus, it's a cock. Cocks are quite repulsive, I must admit. If you ever see a string, it is usually straight thus obviously are quite repulsed by cocks. The amount of repulsiveness the string feels towards the cock will determine how far the cock will go so not only it is highly appropriate to use the term "repulsion", it is essential.
     
  4. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    13,413
    Likes Received:
    231
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    That sounds like revulsion, not repulsion. :p :)
     

Share This Page