User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 34
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    WWAAO
    Posts
    2,144
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question Which should I go for?

    I'm after my first stringing machine and these are the two that I have in mind

    Klippermate M140 Badminton Stringer: http://www.klipperusa.com/products/p...hp?catnum=M140
    Total cost including shipping is US$346.40
    includes 2 badminton clamps, pliers, awl, pack of strings, overgrip.

    or

    Eagnas Hawk 16: http://www.eagnas.com/store/product_...roducts_id=238
    Total cost including shipping is US$239
    includes 2 PN-3050 badminton clamps, 1 DP-507 diagonal cutter, 1 NP-500 needle nose pliers, 1 BS-909 badminton awl, and 1 PN-3092 string mover.


    The Hawk 16 is considerably cheaper and I'm thinking it might be a better buy for a first-time stringer like me.

    What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,945
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    both machines have severe limitation being that they don't have side support. IMHO it is very important to have side support when stringing a badminton racket, esp for beginners. you will find that you will outgrow the machine very soon.

    see if you can stretch your budget a little more for this:

    http://www.mybadmintonstore.com/shop...roducts_id=337

    the shipping you quote is rather high, as much as the cost of the machine, you get much better value by going with the Hi-Qua. you might even be able to find some available in your country.

  3. #3
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,945
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    try this, it is very similar to the hi-qua:

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...-1#post1547859

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,474
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just go for the best. Yonex ES5 I think. Only cost a kidney ($7K).

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,283
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    both machines have severe limitation being that they don't have side support. IMHO it is very important to have side support when stringing a badminton racket, esp for beginners. you will find that you will outgrow the machine very soon.
    I cannot really agree with the side support. If the racket is correctly and tightly mounted, it should handle any job up to 28lb without any issues. I've finished about 1,000 jobs on M140, many above 25lbs, so far nothing bad happend yet.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,660
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I second what Master LB said. I lost count of the wacket I string on my M140. But I can tell you last one I did was a AT900T at 27lb and it sounds fine. And yes, 28 lb and 10% over the recommended tension is prob the max without any additional support. Yes, for the beginner with M140, high tension will be very risky. once you know how to secure the posts, the M140 is actually not to bad.

  7. #7
    Regular Member extremenanopowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    SG. Go for NCAP-L2 certified coach.
    Posts
    11,744
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I do agree. If you have the technique right, it should be fine with tension up to 32lbs.

    I strung a lot of high tension rackets even without support. As long as the tension is consistent, you should be ok.

    The only pain is dealing with older rackets where the grommet is old and at times it cuts the string. Am sure some of you are familiar with this.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,283
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by llpjlau View Post
    I'm after my first stringing machine and these are the two that I have in mind

    Klippermate M140 Badminton Stringer: http://www.klipperusa.com/products/p...hp?catnum=M140
    Total cost including shipping is US$346.40
    includes 2 badminton clamps, pliers, awl, pack of strings, overgrip.

    or

    Eagnas Hawk 16: http://www.eagnas.com/store/product_...roducts_id=238
    Total cost including shipping is US$239
    includes 2 PN-3050 badminton clamps, 1 DP-507 diagonal cutter, 1 NP-500 needle nose pliers, 1 BS-909 badminton awl, and 1 PN-3092 string mover.


    The Hawk 16 is considerably cheaper and I'm thinking it might be a better buy for a first-time stringer like me.

    What do you guys think?
    The main problem I have with the Hawk-16 is, the base looks to be too small, therefore un-stable. Unless $100 is really the key issue, otherwise, I will say save a bit longer, and go for the M140. If you have the technique, it will give you quality jobs from 18lbs to 28lbs, without any issues.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LazyBuddy View Post
    I cannot really agree with the side support. If the racket is correctly and tightly mounted, it should handle any job up to 28lb without any issues. I've finished about 1,000 jobs on M140, many above 25lbs, so far nothing bad happend yet.
    could you elaborate on what you mean by correctly? i am a beginner stringer and just got the m140 as well. all the racquets i have strung is slightly deformed (head is shorter and wider). i read that this is due to the lack of side supports. is this related to what you are talking about?

    thanks

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,660
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Please go to the M140 instruction post. you will see what the "correctly"" means.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    College Station, Texas USA
    Posts
    96
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Josico View Post
    i am a beginner stringer and just got the m140 as well. all the racquets i have strung is slightly deformed (head is shorter and wider). i read that this is due to the lack of side supports. is this related to what you are talking about?
    Quote Originally Posted by silentheart View Post
    Please go to the M140 instruction post. you will see what the "correctly"" means.
    I have a six point machine, but have often wondered how so many people claim to be able to string at high tensions on two point machines and not deform the racket as Josico has experienced. Out of curiosity, I dug through the M140 instruction post http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...truction/page6 and read on post #96 by Pete LSD the necessary techniques to prevent this, either temporary initial supporting crosses or an add-on support device.

    Just shows how much can be done when resources are limited, but willingness to take time and trouble are not limited. But gosh, it only takes a little more money to get a machine with six point suspension. And with higher tensions becoming more common and useful to players at all levels, to me it seems very short sighted to buy a two point suspension machine.

  12. #12
    Regular Member chris-ccc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    26,739
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Arrow Stringing at higher tensions

    Quote Originally Posted by bsmith View Post
    I have a six point machine, but have often wondered how so many people claim to be able to string at high tensions on two point machines and not deform the racket as Josico has experienced. Out of curiosity, I dug through the M140 instruction post http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...truction/page6 and read on post #96 by Pete LSD the necessary techniques to prevent this, either temporary initial supporting crosses or an add-on support device.

    Just shows how much can be done when resources are limited, but willingness to take time and trouble are not limited. But gosh, it only takes a little more money to get a machine with six point suspension. And with higher tensions becoming more common and useful to players at all levels, to me it seems very short sighted to buy a two point suspension machine.
    .
    It is always riskier to string at higher tension than the recommended tension specified by the racket manufacturers.

    To string at higher tensions than the manufacturer's specifications, much attention is needed to balance out the strain to any sections of the racket-head.

    Even if the racket-head survives the high tension stringing, it might crack just after a few mishits while playing.
    .

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,660
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bsmith View Post
    I have a six point machine, but have often wondered how so many people claim to be able to string at high tensions on two point machines and not deform the racket as Josico has experienced. Out of curiosity, I dug through the M140 instruction post http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...truction/page6 and read on post #96 by Pete LSD the necessary techniques to prevent this, either temporary initial supporting crosses or an add-on support device.

    Just shows how much can be done when resources are limited, but willingness to take time and trouble are not limited. But gosh, it only takes a little more money to get a machine with six point suspension. And with higher tensions becoming more common and useful to players at all levels, to me it seems very short sighted to buy a two point suspension machine.
    Please do not categorize all the 2pt mounted machines the same. I personally feel Eagnas Hawk 2 pt machine is not fit for badminton.
    I do not believe buying M140 is a short sighted move based on the following vs 6 pt mounting machine.
    1) Mounting/unmounting are quicker.
    2) Simple to maintain and almost never breaks down.
    3) more room for me to weave cross.
    4) Price is cheaper than most of 6 pt mount machine.

    IMHO, 28lb (max tension I will go without additional support) is high tension for 90% of non pro players. Often time, that tension feels the same as 30 lb on most of the 6 pt mounting machine. If you push the post in first and check if the post is mounted right, that will eliminate 99% of the distortion issue. Yes, in 2 weeks, I will have a Wilson Baiardo Machine. Does it do better job than my current M140 machine? Yes. But not because the 6pt mounting, but because all other functions.

  14. #14
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,945
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    2pt with extra tension on the cross to undistort the frame shape will feel tighter than the equivalent tension on 6 pt. the reason is that when you undistort, you inevitably have to stretch the main strings which increases the tension.



    how much did that new toy cost you??

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,660
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    2pt with extra tension on the cross to undistort the frame shape will feel tighter than the equivalent tension on 6 pt. the reason is that when you undistort, you inevitably have to stretch the main strings which increases the tension.



    how much did that new toy cost you??
    No, i mean for the same the same tension on the mains/cross. Given 2 racquets same 22.5x25 lb, 1 on 6 pt mount eagnas crank with proper calibration (locked out at 25.5 lb when it set at 25 lb to take out the CP issue) vs M140, the the m140 feel tighter. My observation is that since the racquet is not hold down during cross tensioning, the top actually widen. When you finished stringing, the racquet is back to the same shape. that mean the bottom part actually expend a little which will have higher tension.

    You know me, I do not pay retail or even the street price. The street price is about $6,000. Since it is a demo, a lot less. Better deal than I can get with same condition ES5Pro Tech from Evil Empire.
    Will show some pictures after I get back from US Open in NY.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    College Station, Texas USA
    Posts
    96
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ok, all the masters of 2 pt machines, chief among them Silentheart, have convinced me that even a beginner, if well educated on the proper techniques, can produce a safe and quality string job up to 28 lbs. tension if using a high quality 2 pt. machine and a suitable racket.

    The only catch to this is that the beginner does need to study the advanced instructions found here on BC. My understanding is that the standard instructions typically given with two point machines do not include advanced techniques such as using temporary initial crosses. As a result, a lot of beginners encounter the same experience Josico did with obtaining distorted rackets. My guess is that there are a lot more new stringers in Josico's situation encountering problems with 2 pt machines than there are ones doing perfect strings jobs with them. Of course, that is 100% correctable if they would all just join BC and learn what's up.

    I think we also all agree that six pt suspension is better than two pt suspension, and that if the budget allows for it, go with six pt. suspension even on your very first stringing machine.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,660
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    OK, I will make an offer to dear members here. I will shoot a video of M140 instruction if someone else can put it on Youtube or some thing like that. If someone will do it. I will throw in my tour of Baiardo machine too.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •