User Tag List

View Poll Results: Is Joaquim Fischer service illegal?

Voters
66. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILLEGAL

    43 65.15%
  • LEGAL

    23 34.85%
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 103 to 119 of 123
  1. #103
    Moderator cobalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    8,903
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dimcorner View Post
    If it's for bragging rights, sure it's just a game.
    When prize money and future ranking for prize money is involved, it becomes a job and if you cheat at a job people will get pissed.
    You're right. However, my point was that it is not purely a mechanical "process" but an organic one, and will always require a more holistic view of the situation. That is why I referred earlier to "range of tolerance" and "discretion." The fact that almost all officials polled chose to interpret the serve in a more open-minded way should tell us that even in professional sport, there is place for common sense and reasonable-ness as opposed to letter-of-law and zero-tolerance. If that were the case, as Gollum correctly pointed out, a lot of players would have to be sent back to school.

  2. #104
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    438
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cobalt View Post
    You're right. However, my point was that it is not purely a mechanical "process" but an organic one, and will always require a more holistic view of the situation. That is why I referred earlier to "range of tolerance" and "discretion." The fact that almost all officials polled chose to interpret the serve in a more open-minded way should tell us that even in professional sport, there is place for common sense and reasonable-ness as opposed to letter-of-law and zero-tolerance. If that were the case, as Gollum correctly pointed out, a lot of players would have to be sent back to school.
    Agreed.

    I think as long as he always has that hitch and doesn't deviate from it then it's "ok". The moment he changes it to throw people off then it becomes iffy.

    Tough because keeping shuttle below waist is another tricky one to call. I had someone tell me my serve is illegal (a lady I was playing against in mixed) so i said fine, i flicked all the serves from that point on to her and she had no good return after that.

  3. #105
    Moderator cobalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    8,903
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dimcorner View Post
    ---snip-- Tough because keeping shuttle below waist is another tricky one to call. I had someone tell me my serve is illegal (a lady I was playing against in mixed) so i said fine, i flicked all the serves from that point on to her and she had no good return after that.
    Ha, talk about backfire! Strange though, I was just thinking about the same thing: that "above/below the waist" rule, and the confusion it sometimes causes. I think a little tolerance should be allowed there as well, specially as we cannot "see" exactly where the last rib ends at the moment of serve! IMO, the racquet-angle-downward is a good one, and maybe they should expand on that "visible" and "measurable" component to set up a better rule for serves.

  4. #106
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,135
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Now that you fellas have mentioned waist serving faults, I've noticed that in the recent INA and SG super series, there has been much more service faults called re racket not in downward direction, above the waist, and even foot moving during serve(!). I can only imagine that BWF wanted to send a message to the players that they will be stricter in preparation for the upcomg Olympics.

  5. #107
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    NorCal, United States
    Posts
    930
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, for Indonesia Open, another umpire and I were chatting while watching. We both agreed there were quite a few missed service calls. Especially on above the waist. Some players serve near chest height but surprisingly weren't called.

  6. #108
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,135
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CantSmashThis View Post
    Yes, for Indonesia Open, another umpire and I were chatting while watching. We both agreed there were quite a few missed service calls. Especially on above the waist. Some players serve near chest height but surprisingly weren't called.
    I know which players you're referring to... 2 of them happen to be INA players right?

  7. #109
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    NorCal, United States
    Posts
    930
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    I know which players you're referring to... 2 of them happen to be INA players right?
    Yes, and especially one Malaysian player I saw :P

  8. #110
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,992
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cobalt View Post
    Ha, talk about backfire! Strange though, I was just thinking about the same thing: that "above/below the waist" rule, and the confusion it sometimes causes. I think a little tolerance should be allowed there as well, specially as we cannot "see" exactly where the last rib ends at the moment of serve! IMO, the racquet-angle-downward is a good one, and maybe they should expand on that "visible" and "measurable" component to set up a better rule for serves.
    Esiest would be a rule just saying the shuttle are not allowed to be hit higher than x cm above the floor when serving.. and then mark that height on the pole or the net for the service judge (or camera) to check that the serve is not to high.

    Fair and simple rule. compared to an unfair (short players are penalized, and long players get an unfair advantage) and hard to call service rule..

  9. #111
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    Esiest would be a rule just saying the shuttle are not allowed to be hit higher than x cm above the floor when serving.. and then mark that height on the pole or the net for the service judge (or camera) to check that the serve is not to high.

    Fair and simple rule. compared to an unfair (short players are penalized, and long players get an unfair advantage) and hard to call service rule..
    That is a great idea. It would take most of the subjectivity out of the serve and make it more fair for everyone.

  10. #112
    Regular Member StefanDO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Dortmund, Germany
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I welcome a criterion which doesn't give an advantage to either short or tall players. I'm just not sure if a x cm above the floor criterion is the solution. One may argue that tall players may have a disadvantage because for the maximum height of serve, their racket would point more downwards as compared to shorter players, right? I think this makes handling more difficult for some kinds of serves, e.g. a drive serve.

  11. #113
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am not so sure whether I would fault this service. It agree it looks a little unpleasant from where it is shown in the video, but I am not sure that a service could be played from that initial forward movement and I also do not see any real handling problems for the opponents. It is difficult to assess this from a distance. You have to sit in that chair in order to come to a proper decision as to whether this service should be faulted or not. There is a lot more to serving and receiving than the letter of the law.

  12. #114
    Regular Member gundamzaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Santa Clara County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,508
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dimcorner View Post
    Agreed.

    I think as long as he always has that hitch and doesn't deviate from it then it's "ok". The moment he changes it to throw people off then it becomes iffy.

    Tough because keeping shuttle below waist is another tricky one to call. I had someone tell me my serve is illegal (a lady I was playing against in mixed) so i said fine, i flicked all the serves from that point on to her and she had no good return after that.
    hahaha, that's the thing, if it's recreational or even at a local tournament level, why so serious. i have more fun during a long rally then when my opponent misses all his serves because i called them above the waistline.

  13. #115
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    NorCal, United States
    Posts
    930
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well, for the waist rule, they are planning to take care of that.

    For the racket pointing downwards, usually this one is kinda tough for me to call when it gets super close because some players have that very little dip and especially on flick serves they do a very quick motion and it takes a while to actually picture in your mind where the shuttle was contacted on the serve.

  14. #116
    Regular Member AlanY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,568
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    may be badminton can adopt the rule similar to table tennis.
    umpire can issue a warning to the server if that getting close to illegal and next time you will be faulted.

  15. #117
    Regular Member Henzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Heiloo, Netherlands
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    seems illegal to me...

    I think this is an illegal serve. I would say something about it maybe.....

  16. #118
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Where else?
    Posts
    2,146
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If I were the service judge, I would probably call it a fault serve. To me anyway, it certainly looks like a "double-motion" service.

    Also, comments like "I didnt even notice it until this stupid thread came along" and "This is now verging on the coveted title of the "Dumbest thread ever"." are probably the worst comments I've seen on BC in a long while. Hit the close or exit button if it's so "dumb". There's no point having a BC forum at all if discussion is shunned.

  17. #119
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Strathmore Alberta
    Posts
    847
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As a lines/service judge the double action thing gets a bit of pass if it is consistent and isn't used as a means of deception.

    Lin Dan got called a couple times when it was really bad and if i recall, when he threw in the odd flick serve.


    The bigger issue I find is the height of serve. I have so many people arguing the "first rib" crap.

    Easy fix - the t joint area of the raquest has to be below your waist when the shuttle is contacted.

    Where is your waist? Below your belly button. It would be very simply to add a line to the shirt if you tend to like shirts that cover your shorts.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Illegal serve?
    By decoy in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 11
    : 10-07-2011, 10:54 PM
  2. Is Lin Dan's Serve Illegal?
    By sergesa in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 75
    : 04-10-2007, 12:54 AM
  3. my serve is illegal? please help...
    By yoyomonkey in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 7
    : 07-04-2006, 10:14 AM
  4. Serve illegal?
    By silentlight in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 8
    : 03-18-2005, 01:39 AM
  5. What's consider an illegal serve?
    By Sgt_Strider in forum General Forum
    Replies: 6
    : 07-23-2003, 08:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •