User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 21
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,210
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default How is ranking determined within each Group

    can someone tell me how ranking is determined within each Group? thanks...

    let me know which rules... thanks

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    2,140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't know the "exact" rules.
    but I know little of it.
    first is look at matches player/pair won. sort from highest to lowest.
    if two player/pair have the equal score for the matches, then look for the total game, sort from highest to lowest.
    if two player/pair have the equal score for the games, then look for the total points, sort from highest to lowest.

    hope you understand what i mean.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,210
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i understand how "matches won" are determined, it is pretty simple... you can either win or lose... (there is no tie)...

    but for games won, is it the games difference? ie, the number of games won minus the number of games lost?

    for points, is it points difference??

  4. #4
    Regular Member chris-ccc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    26,814
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .
    As far as I know;

    The top player/pair is the one to win the most number of matches in their group.

    If the number of matches won are the same, then look at the most number of games won.

    If the number of matches and games won are the same, then look at the most number of points won.

    Some said to look at the difference between the matches, games and points won; But I believe it is not.
    .

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,210
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i found the rules.. it's Part III section 1A.. Regulation 16.2.... i was scratching my head as to who won at Group A of WS...

    "16.2 In case of Individual Championships:
    16.2.1 Ranking in individual championships will be established by the number of matches won.
    16.2.2 If two players / pairs have won the same number of matches, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.
    16.2.3 If three or more players / pairs have won the same number of matches, ranking will be established by the difference between total games won and total games lost, with greater difference ranked higher.
    16.2.3.1 If this still leaves two players / pairs equal, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.
    16.2.4 If three or more players / pairs have won the same number of matches and are equal in the difference between total games won and total games lost, ranking will be established by the difference between total points won and total points lost, with greater difference ranked higher.
    16.2.4.1 If this still leaves two players / pairs equal, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.
    16.2.4.2 If three or more players / pairs are still equal, then ranking will be established by drawing lots.
    16.2.5 If illness, injury, disqualification or other unavoidable hindrance prevents a player / pair completing all the pool matches, all the results of that player / pair shall be deleted. Retiring during a match shall be considered to be not completing all pool matches.
    16.2.6 A player / pair is entitled to prizes according to results actually obtained before any withdrawal due to injury."

  6. #6
    Regular Member chris-ccc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    26,814
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up 2011 SS Finals: The official rules for Group Ranking

    Quote Originally Posted by pcll99 View Post
    i found the rules.. it's Part III section 1A.. Regulation 16.2.... i was scratching my head as to who won at Group A of WS...

    "16.2 In case of Individual Championships:
    16.2.1 Ranking in individual championships will be established by the number of matches won.
    16.2.2 If two players / pairs have won the same number of matches, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.
    16.2.3 If three or more players / pairs have won the same number of matches, ranking will be established by the difference between total games won and total games lost, with greater difference ranked higher.
    16.2.3.1 If this still leaves two players / pairs equal, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.
    16.2.4 If three or more players / pairs have won the same number of matches and are equal in the difference between total games won and total games lost, ranking will be established by the difference between total points won and total points lost, with greater difference ranked higher.
    16.2.4.1 If this still leaves two players / pairs equal, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.
    16.2.4.2 If three or more players / pairs are still equal, then ranking will be established by drawing lots.
    16.2.5 If illness, injury, disqualification or other unavoidable hindrance prevents a player / pair completing all the pool matches, all the results of that player / pair shall be deleted. Retiring during a match shall be considered to be not completing all pool matches.
    16.2.6 A player / pair is entitled to prizes according to results actually obtained before any withdrawal due to injury."
    .
    Thanks... We have found the official rules.
    .

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,210
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i might have found the rules, but I am not sure I understand it entirely...

    after all three matches, WYH is ahead of Tine because WYH won more games than Tine, right? not because of h2h result between the two, right?

    Tine is ahead of Sung because Tine won the h2h between them, right? not because of games difference, right?
    Last edited by pcll99; 12-16-2011 at 10:43 AM.

  8. #8
    Regular Member chris-ccc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    26,814
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcll99 View Post
    i might have found the rules, but I am not sure I understand it entirely...

    after all three matches, WYH is ahead of Tine because WYH won more games than Tine, right? not because of h2h result between the two, right?

    Tine is ahead of Sung because Tine won the h2h between them, right?
    .
    When you read these types of rules, treat their order/number as the important order.

    WYH is ahead of Tine because of 16.2.2. Similarly, Tine is ahead of Sung because of 16.2.2.

    Comparing WYH and Sung, WYH won more points than Sung (16.2.4).

    There is no need to go further down the list (of rules/conditions).
    .
    Last edited by chris-ccc; 12-16-2011 at 11:00 AM.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,210
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chris-ccc View Post
    .
    When you read these types of rules, treat their order/number as the important order.

    WYH is ahead of Tine because of 16.2.2. Similarly, Tine is ahead of Sung because of 16.2.2.

    There is no need to go further down the list (of rules/conditions).
    .

    I don't understand how 16.2.2 tell us why Tine is ahead of Sung..... you meant 16.2.3 (including its sub-rule 16.2.3.1), right?
    Last edited by pcll99; 12-16-2011 at 11:06 AM.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    3,333
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Those rules apply for group matches. What about semi? Can they walkover or retire?

  11. #11
    Regular Member chris-ccc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    26,814
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcll99 View Post
    I don't understand how 16.2.2 tell us why Tine is ahead of Sung..... you meant 16.2.3 (including its sub-rule 16.2.3.1), right?
    .
    16.2.2 states that;

    If two players / pairs have won the same number of matches, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.

    Tine defeated Sung, therefore Tine is ranked higher.
    .

  12. #12

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    3,333
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chris-ccc View Post
    .16.2.2 states that;If two players / pairs have won the same number of matches, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.Tine defeated Sung, therefore Tine is ranked higher..
    But Sung defeated WYH, so Sung should be ranked higher.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,210
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chris-ccc View Post
    .
    16.2.2 states that;

    If two players / pairs have won the same number of matches, the winner of the match between them will be ranked higher.

    Tine defeated Sung, therefore Tine is ranked higher.
    .
    I don't understand... But 16.2.2 will apply if there are only two players have won the same number of matches.... in this case, THREE players have won the same number of matches...

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    12,129
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    16.2.3, 16.2.3.1 and 16.2.4

  16. #16
    Regular Member chris-ccc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    26,814
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pjswift View Post
    Those rules apply for group matches. What about semi? Can they walkover or retire?
    .
    From Semi-Finals onward, the knock-out/elimination system comes into play.

    Can they give walkover and/or retire? Of course they can.

    No player or pair is forced to play if they are not up to it. This is when match-fixing can be used (sorry that Badminton is not an individual participation sport, but an inter-nation association sport).
    .

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,210
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eaglehelang View Post
    16.2.3, 16.2.3.1 and 16.2.4
    thanks... i think you are right....

    so WYH is ahead of Tine because of H2H??? not game differences?

    and Tine is ahead of Sung because of game differences, right?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Keeping score / player ranking in a group
    By Gisli in forum General Forum
    Replies: 1
    : 06-03-2011, 12:44 PM
  2. Rexy is determined to arrest slide
    By X Ball in forum Malaysia Professional Players
    Replies: 221
    : 10-07-2007, 12:53 PM
  3. Misbun determined to get Chong Wei back on his feet
    By ixory in forum World Championships 2007
    Replies: 28
    : 08-24-2007, 06:31 AM
  4. Which is more important? World ranking or SS ranking?
    By alfa-2 in forum Professional Players
    Replies: 72
    : 03-27-2007, 10:49 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •