Has anyone tried those two shuttles? If so, how do they rate on play, flight, and durability? From Head's website, http://www.head.com/badminton/products/shuttlecocks/feather-shuttlecocks/?region=eu, Air Power 70 is BWF approved tournament shuttles. However, can't find any review or rating on it or its sibling, AP 60. appreciate your feedback.
http://www.verdicts.co.uk/reviews/head-air-power-60-badminton-shuttles-321/ http://www.verdicts.co.uk/reviews/head-air-power-60-badminton-shuttles-321/ try these links out and see if that answers you question. i imagine if the 70 is approved by the BWF then the 60 cant be far off in quality
thanks for the link for Air Power 60. However, the content is more or less like marketing materials. there wasn't any real player's comment or comparison with any other shuttles.
IMO these shuttles are good. Almost as good as RSL Tourney No.1. The feathers are harder than the RSL's. But I have only tested 1/2 dozen of Head Airpower 60 and 70. I have used a lot of RSL's.
thanks for the info. Could you elaborate a bit more about their comparison, such as flight and durability? During winter here, durability is very poor for most shuttles. I believe it's almost the same weather situation in Netherlands.
The flight is good, but RSL is more consistent. IMO the durability is a little better then the RSL because of the harder feathers. The feathers of the RSL's breaks faster.
great to hear from you. maybe that's why BWF dropped Head Air Power 70 from their approved shuttles now.