User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    taiwan
    Posts
    207
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default RSL 2012 EVOLUTION racket with Weight Positioning System

    RSL 2012 EVO rackets applied a WPS tec
    which allow you to adjust the racket
    frame weight and balance point
    (using the tool sets included in the racket)

    WPS
    : Weight Positioning System
    WPS plated and WPS End Plates alter the racket's weight at different positions

    which changes the balance, the stability, the power, the control and the feel of the racket.

    This EVO rackets come with 3 model rackets:
    VR1: 80g frame --- could adjust to 79--86g
    6.5-7.5mm taper shaft
    VR2: 83g frame --- could adjust to 82--89g
    6.5-7.5mm taper shaft
    VR3: 83g frame --- could adjust to 79--86g
    7.0mm shaft
    Attached Images Attached Images                  

  2. #2
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    interesting... but nothing that we can't achieve ourselves already by using athletic tape on the frame and heavier/lighter grips on the handle

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    klang
    Posts
    559
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the part which i'm not interested is because the PLATE at frame can only install when change new the string. it because the PLATE is acting like grommet to the string.

  4. #4
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,913
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    great idea!

    even though this should not be specific to RSL. we can always do that to other rackets given we can find similar weight strips.

  5. #5
    Regular Member Maklike Tier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,169
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I thought this was a bit stupid at first, because for 6 bucks you can already buy lead tape and customise your racket as much as you like, but I do like the way that RSL has 'formalised' this customisation.

    Having to add the side weights before stringing though is a huge pain in the arse. You can pretty much guarantee that the first stringing will be in the trash within hours of being strung.

    I'd take advantage of Erics stringing service and specify what you think might work in terms of the weights, and order another packet of string while you're at it!

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    240
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is a very logical idea. If you use lead tape and it flies off and kills your opponent, who will be responsible? RSL will not take that kind of uncalculated risk. If it is held by the string, guaranteed no murder on court will happen.

  7. #7
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,913
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    i also wonder how the strips will react to having a couple hundreds pounds of force pulling on it. will it warp?

    seems like aerodynamically not very ideal.

  8. #8
    Regular Member Maklike Tier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,169
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kason already use a 'strip' type grommet system so I'd hazard to suggest it will be fine.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    240
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A better idea is weighted grommets and the placement at the 2 o'clock and 10 o'clock position. It will protect the racket during stringing and add weight at the same time. Kind of like the grommets strip.

  10. #10
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,913
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    and now comes in video:


  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    USJ
    Posts
    331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    interesting
    but they should make the shaft stiffer
    if not, the shaft will be too flexy when the max head weight is on

  12. #12
    Regular Member shosasakigamba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Scotorando
    Posts
    147
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    At first inspection i thought this was unnecessary.

    But i do like the idea of altering your racket as you improve so you dont outgrow the racket quite as fast.

    Saying that though there is no way to customise the shaft.

    Still kudos to RSL for thinking outside the box.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    from Indonesia, now in China
    Posts
    2,444
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    so.. we know that the end plate is rubbish as being displayed by apacs lurid and their butt cap

    the only thing that makes me interested with this racket is the plates on the grommet area
    but one thing that I would like to know: how about the aerodynamic factor? is it good enough? or the bulge hinders the aerodynamic factor?

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Quebec City
    Posts
    241
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I still think that the m11 serie from RSL is more interesting... But as other have said, you have to change strings to change the weights because they did not want to see the weights flying off and hitting people! (Though, I have already seen a racket flying through 3 courts during a tournament! - And it was my double's partner while he was playing singles...)

  15. #15
    Regular Member BlueTornado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Bay Area, USA
    Posts
    793
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Does it work better compared to Apacs Lurid Power? I remember seeing that line had a similar setup.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you like the above, check out the discussion on this thread:

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=119194&goto=newpost

    It follows the same line of thinking - racket customisation. Some interesting arguements for and against racket customisation.

Similar Threads

  1. Polish Open Championships 2012 (8/30/2012-9/9/2012)
    By LD rules! in forum 2012 Tournaments
    Replies: 5
    : 09-03-2012, 08:25 AM
  2. Racket Weight Preference.
    By Iwan in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 5
    : 06-17-2003, 02:55 PM
  3. Ti-10 Weight (well any racket really)
    By lilayzunboi in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 21
    : 04-19-2003, 06:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •