User Tag List

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 35 to 51 of 134
  1. #35
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    im in love with F9 now, got some timing issues but, will overcome it, not to much power need to be put into it while playing yet the shuttle seems to fly at ease. it suits me with Bg66ultimax 26lbs

  2. #36
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    83
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    im lovin it more now haha

  3. #37
    Regular Member yurimaster2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    MY
    Posts
    1,004
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    F9 is more flex than vt70 n ns6600.?
    Lighter head than arscb10?
    Mean Same light head as ns9900?

    There no many pro players use flex racket n looking to smashing beast fhf using it, it a joke.

  4. #38
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Weh yurimaster.......kalau nak main drive jer pakai stiff.....ko tgk fhf pakai flexible shaft racket......smash dia meletop laju siottt.........Hahaha

  5. #39
    Regular Member yurimaster2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    MY
    Posts
    1,004
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    wow f9 is damn flex!!
    i tot only low end racket was build with flex shaft

  6. #40
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ajax, ON
    Posts
    195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah the f9 is pretty flexible. A lot of timing issues coming from my ns9900 but there are certain aspects that make it a dream. Defending is a breeze but everything else (except backhand drops oddly enough) needs more practice to work out timing. Will maybe post a review in the near future and compare it to vtzf, ns9900, arc10, n55 (although there might not be a point :P)

  7. #41
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    got it for around 2 weeks....extremely flexible for me....good smashing power.
    feels weird when i first got it...timing for everything is totally from my other racquets. now my favorite racquet. overall a wonderful racquet.

  8. #42
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Malacca, M'sia
    Posts
    3,055
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    now i'm thinking of buying either F9 or C7....not sure which one to go for...I'm usually backcourt player but oddly enough I know that CY uses the more head heavy C7...is it fast enough to defend well?

  9. #43
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    511
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have both... well, if you ask me, I think F9 is more suitable for doubles since it is faster compared to C7. C7 definitely suitable for singles for its stiffer shaft. As for defense, both can defend well...

  10. #44
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Malacca, M'sia
    Posts
    3,055
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davlee View Post
    I have both... well, if you ask me, I think F9 is more suitable for doubles since it is faster compared to C7. C7 definitely suitable for singles for its stiffer shaft. As for defense, both can defend well...
    thanks for the feedback...gonna get an f9 then i guess...=)

  11. #45
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    PJ, Malaysia
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davlee View Post
    I have both... well, if you ask me, I think F9 is more suitable for doubles since it is faster compared to C7. C7 definitely suitable for singles for its stiffer shaft. As for defense, both can defend well...
    You've used MX60 as well right? How does it compare with F9? Which is much more similar to MX60? F9 or C7?

  12. #46
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    511
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chicha View Post
    You've used MX60 as well right? How does it compare with F9? Which is much more similar to MX60? F9 or C7?
    Yes, you are so right. Indeed I have used MX60 before and I would say C7 is more similar to MX60. F9 is a level more flexible than the two. However, now I prefer to use F9 especially for doubles as I can maneuver it faster than C7. Maybe it is my own preference, which I prefer flexible racket. Hope this helps

  13. #47
    Regular Member KEN_KL MSIA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    KL
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davlee View Post
    Yes, you are so right. Indeed I have used MX60 before and I would say C7 is more similar to MX60. F9 is a level more flexible than the two. However, now I prefer to use F9 especially for doubles as I can maneuver it faster than C7. Maybe it is my own preference, which I prefer flexible racket. Hope this helps
    Bro,
    F9 Ltd vs MX JJS vs BS LYD, which model good for heavy smashing?

    Rgds,,,KEN

  14. #48
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    2,498
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How about comparing F9 vs F9 Ltd. ?

    Any bros have any review ?

  15. #49
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    511
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ken - There is no one racket that is ultimately best for heavy smashing. It all depends on your skill and whether the racket suits you or not. Do you know the proper way to smash correctly? If you ask me, the most head heavy racket and stiffest racket should be the best for smashing... maybe like Vt 80 or VTZF. But the point is whether you can maximize such rackets. If not, it will do more harm than good. As for MXJJS and BS LYD, I cannot comment much as I have not used them before.

    Ferrerkiko - Have you heard or are there any differences between F9 and F9 LTD besides the paintjob? If you ask me, I dont think there are any differences with regards to the specification. It is just some graphic differences between the two hence I think both play the same...

  16. #50
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Depending on ur smashing technique, head heavy racquet will take a little longer for recovery after a heavy smash. F9 is a racquet designed for continuous smashing players like FHF himself. As it is head light so recovery speed would be faster than head heavy racquets.

  17. #51
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    PJ, Malaysia
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davlee View Post
    Yes, you are so right. Indeed I have used MX60 before and I would say C7 is more similar to MX60. F9 is a level more flexible than the two. However, now I prefer to use F9 especially for doubles as I can maneuver it faster than C7. Maybe it is my own preference, which I prefer flexible racket. Hope this helps
    Can i say that the MX60 sits in between the F9 and C7 in terms of shaft stiffness and head heaviness? MX60 slightly head heavier than F9 or the F9 doesn't feel head heavy at all when u swing it?

    Still undecided whether to get F9 or C7 to backup my MX60. Love smashing with the MX60. F9 would be much easier to smash compare to C7 . Don't want another MX60 as my hand itchy to try other racket

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Kason Twister C7 Review
    By wana2125 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 40
    : 10-02-2013, 12:50 PM
  2. WTB: Kason Twister F9/ C7/ SW37/ Kason 300 series A/D/Ti (MY)
    By ammil89 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 5
    : 04-17-2012, 09:13 AM
  3. New Kason Twister for Cai Yun?
    By Maklike Tier in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 13
    : 03-18-2012, 10:28 AM
  4. WTB: Kason Twister C7
    By wana2125 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 01-08-2012, 10:34 PM
  5. FS: For Sale Worldwide - Kason Twister C7 and Kason Twister F9 as used by CY/FHF.
    By Iffara in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 08-17-2011, 06:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •