User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Thin Frame vs Thick Frame

    So far I have been readind the threats and realise camparison often made only to the stiffness, weight and etc. So, what about the frame?

    Well nowsday Yonex produces rackets with thin frame like what we can see on Yonex VZF as compared to other brands of racket. However, somehow, it gives me a feeling that it is less solid and not durable (I don't refer specifically to VZF but most of the models of Yonex).

    What do you think?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    UK / Belgium
    Posts
    550
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thinner frames are going to be aerodynamically more efficient.
    But not as durable in a clash, for instance.
    I think that's pretty obvious though.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Its their master plan to make us buy more rackets .

    Maybe advances in material science or design has allowed relatively strong rackets to be made with thinner frames. The game has also sped up in terms of shot frequency, so need faster rackets, even if they dont hit quite as hard.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    from Indonesia, now in China
    Posts
    2,436
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I tried my friend's racket it's wilson viper something (cheap 30 racket)
    the frame is really thick
    it says 87g, and even balance
    when I used it, it is hard to swing compared to thinner racket such as MX80 (which is around 85.6g and head heavy)

    head heavy racket should be harder to swing, but strangely, that wilson racket (which is even balance..) is harder to swing

    thinner frame means more aero dynamic, and better swing speed
    I don't think anyone wants to compromise the swing speed with durability
    IMO it is not worth it

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    UK / Belgium
    Posts
    550
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Head shape and profile also have an effect, so it's unlikely to be down to only the frame thickness. Combining many different aspects is more likely to be noticeable.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, but Yonex thin frame is really thin. The FEELING is like one clash or very strong smash can simply K.O the racket.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmtfreak123 View Post
    Yeah, but Yonex thin frame is really thin. The FEELING is like one clash or very strong smash can simply K.O the racket.
    What about wall thickness ?. I mean, smaller in outer diameter but have thicker wall thickness should be stronger than the the one with thinner wall thickness.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    surabaya, indonesia
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A strong smash on the strings, no matter how powerful is not going to fracture a racket. What breaks that frame is most probably uneven high tension stringing, ie lousy string job. or insanely high tensioned strong string. (A guitar string maybe?)

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Buddy of mine broke his zslash on by hitting the frame. Not sure what the string tensions were.

    I personally don't think the frame thickness as an important quality of the racket.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    surabaya, indonesia
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Wink

    Agreed, durability outside intended use should be of no concern to manufacturers. The earlier they broke the more rackets they can sell. Ha..ha..ha..

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yup, but wallet pain :/

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sautom88 View Post
    Agreed, durability outside intended use should be of no concern to manufacturers. The earlier they broke the more rackets they can sell. Ha..ha..ha..
    Just because its thick it does not mean it is more durable.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 34
    : 03-12-2013, 03:11 PM
  2. Thick Grip Vs. Thin
    By huchmo in forum Grip
    Replies: 50
    : 09-22-2012, 07:15 AM
  3. Oversized Frame vs Isometric Frame - Pros & Cons
    By shinn in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 2
    : 08-01-2011, 11:20 AM
  4. Do u like ur grip thick or thin?
    By rapidfire in forum Grip
    Replies: 3
    : 04-18-2010, 03:46 AM
  5. Definition : aerodynamic frame and box frame
    By niemrieng in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 2
    : 11-05-2009, 10:37 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •