Results 52 to 68 of 117
04-10-2012, 03:52 AM #52
Why need skirt when most doubles legs so porky
kwun liked this post
04-10-2012, 04:07 AM #53
Hahaha..Volcom...I can't answer that....
04-10-2012, 04:27 AM #54
04-10-2012, 05:39 AM #55
BWF might as well reduce the SS tournaments to 5
To reduce SS from 12 to 6 is a good idea, but we know that 5 of the SS are SSP. Therefore, BWF might as well reduce the SS tournaments to 5. Turn the other 7 SS to GPG.
IMHO, many players participate in tournaments to gain world ranking points. BWF need to make changes to their ranking points (being awarded in tournaments); Make BIGGER difference of points being awarded to tournaments (in the SS, GP, IC and IS).
My suggestion is for the ranking points to be awarded based on the ratio of tournament prize monies.
Note: Since the Thomas Cup, Uber Cup and Sudirman Cup are Teams Events (without prize monies), no ranking points shall be awarded to players of teams.
Last edited by chris-ccc; 04-10-2012 at 05:44 AM.
04-10-2012, 07:32 AM #56
Having a variety of winners on the podium has to be a fair process and creates national interest. Imagine if Kevin Cordon won a SS title but without the strongest chinese players there. For himself, there's the motivation to continue on a personal level, he may attract more funding from his national body, interest in his own country definitely gets a boost - and it's all fair because there was no restriction on chinese players - it was because they chose not to send players to that particular tournament.
So I would definitely be against a reduction. If China want to protect their players from injury, then they have to either a) alter their training programme, or b) play in fewer tournaments.
04-10-2012, 07:51 AM #57
the way i see is simple. The higher the fewer.
For example, the most important individual event on the calendar is Olympics and WC. There is only 1 such event per year. The most important team event is TUC and Sudirman. There is only 1 such event per year.
The next important events are PSS and SS Finals. Currently there are six such events.
The next are SS event. There are seven such events.
GPG: there are 12
GP: there are 4
So there are 13 PSS/SS event and 16 GP/GPG event, a total of 29.
Without changing the number of total tournaments, i suggest that we change the calendar to the following instead:
wouldn't the above be more logical?
Last edited by pcll99; 04-10-2012 at 08:02 AM.
04-10-2012, 08:42 AM #58
......but there is no obligation for ALL the Chinese to go to ALL tournaments... Lin Dan can go to the 5 PSS, 5 SS and 1 WC/OG and the SS Finals...
Why would any idiot criticize a $ 1 million prize money?!? More money for the sport is excellent!!!
04-10-2012, 10:16 AM #59
Whilst we hope for more tournaments and higher prize monies, surely there must be limitations to what can be achieved within just one calendar year without any decline in standards all round.
It has been said that to entice the right kind of sponsors to support the tournaments for an extended period is not so easy. Sponsors have their own objectives and timeframes. On the other hand, BWF and the local NBAs also have their own which may not coincide entirely with the sponsors. So some form of accommodation have to be tolerated.
To spearhead the popularity of badminton in new countries may need much more help and resources from BWF to be successful. Trained manpower, including not only the officials but also the backup staff, are also needed to ensure success.
Ideally professional players should be paid for participation at least to compensate them for expenses on food, lodging and travel, and this should be included in at least the SS and GP events.
Then there must be good attendance and media coverage, especially TV, to satisfy sponsors and fans. In this sense, although Macau can easily fork out the money but is unable to attract good attendance that makes it a bad choice.
So success can only be achieved when all these ingredients fall into place to popularize badminton. We can't just wave the magic wand to turn Africa or Latin America into an overnight success! Lots more have to be done to prepare for ultimate success.
So the allocation of the various BWF tournaments should be well-balanced to reward countries which truly deserve. And it is no point to increase the number of tournament without a concomitant increase in quality standards.
Last edited by Loh; 04-10-2012 at 10:28 AM.
04-10-2012, 02:13 PM #60
I hardly watch tennis live so can't really comment whether doubles event are boring. To me, I find that even the single matches are boring.
As for badminton, I find WD boring because a lot of the pairs are winning through stamina(long rallies). If there is live TV broadcast, I sometimes watch or do other things when the WD doubles match start and watching only the last few points.
04-10-2012, 06:10 PM #61
Maybe bwf could set a limit to ranking tournaments towards OG qualifiers. eg// you're top 12 tournament results are used. That way players wont feel like they have to go to more tournaments than they need to, which should cut back on injuries.
04-11-2012, 12:26 PM #62
04-11-2012, 05:04 PM #63
if the BWF committee is majority asian and they try vote for more asian events, the this shows an inward looking attitude that will mean these other venues will never get a chance to host a big tournament.
With respect to less tournaments of course China want less. They will have a tighter grip on ranking and qualification manipulation. if there are more high ranking events they have less chance to do this unless they make the players play more tournaments. China prefer to play the tournaments they have to, go back and train for big events and just win them.
04-11-2012, 06:18 PM #64
04-12-2012, 12:51 AM #65
CJ is one example and he still had to play to gain more Olympic ranking points to get ahead of PG if he wants to be the third player after LD and CL to be the last CHN MS representative. CJ has got injured before and the worse thing to happen is for him to sustain another injury after he has qualified for LOG.
04-12-2012, 10:17 AM #66
I don't agree that smaller countries should not be able to hold a SS event.
Look at F1 - Monaco grand prix sticks out.
BTW Krisna, 5 PSS and 10 SS is absolutely fine. It also give more permutations when world ranking results are published. Quite possibly, that movement in rankings will give us fans more to talk about.
04-12-2012, 10:34 AM #67
04-12-2012, 10:42 AM #68
By danielwong in forum China Masters / Japan Open 2009Replies: 261: 09-28-2009, 08:08 AM
By LI De Quan in forum Thailand Open 2007 / China Open (1) 2007 / Philippines Open 2007Replies: 117: 07-15-2007, 10:11 AM
By X Ball in forum Thailand Open 2007 / China Open (1) 2007 / Philippines Open 2007Replies: 38: 07-15-2007, 05:43 AM
By ants in forum Thailand Open 2007 / China Open (1) 2007 / Philippines Open 2007Replies: 0: 06-22-2007, 02:49 PM
By Kai91 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 12-11-2004, 10:52 AM