Results 18 to 34 of 117
04-09-2012, 02:52 AM #18
Oh, the minimum prize money for 2013 onwards [I agree with huangkwokhau for the PSS and SS] can be increased:
Premier SS $500,000
GP Gold $150,000
International Challenge $30,000
International Series $10,000
Future Series $2500
They had stayed at the current levels for too long. The value of US$ have depleted so much after all the Quantitative Easing practices [a.k.a. US printing money]. And no more of this nonsense that Future Series gives out $0 prize money. Professional players should get paid!
As for the Juniors, ok laaah, keep the current arrangements:
International Junior Challenge $15,000
International Junior Series $5,000
International Future Series $0
04-09-2012, 03:14 AM #19
I think the BWF should do as follows:
04-09-2012, 03:18 AM #20
Even the prize money of INA's Domestic Circuit (Sirnas) is Rp 200 millions, even more than the current standard of GPG-level.
04-09-2012, 03:24 AM #21
04-09-2012, 04:47 AM #22
I heard we are pushing for more IC/IS tourneys to be held in Indonesia...in that case we can upgrade the more high-profile Sirnas like Jakarta Open or other private-sponsored tourneys like the Indocock-Specs Walikota Surabaya Cup to be upgraded to points-bearing tourneys. That will serve the Pratama players and other local clubs well!
04-09-2012, 04:55 AM #23
I hope to see the following in South East Asia:
INDONESIA - 1 SSP, 1 GPG, 1 GP, 1 IC, 1 IS + at least 1 Junior tourneys
MALAYSIA - 1 SS, 1 GPG, 1 IC, 1 IS + 1 Junior tourneys
SINGAPORE - 1 SS/GPG, 1 IC/IS + 1 Junior tourneys
THAILAND - 1 SS/GPG, 1 IC/IS + 1 Junior tourneys
VIETNAM - 1 GPG/GP, 1 IC + 1 Junior IC tourneys
PHILIPPINES - 1 GPG/GP, 1 IC/IS + 1 Junior IC tourneys
If these can happen, even a junior player can be guaranteed playing in 5 junior tourneys for ranking purpose each year, while those 19-21 yo can also participate in at least 5-10 IS/IC/GP/GPG level tourneys.
PS: expect some development in Philippines badminton and hopefully more sponsorships for tourneys!
Last edited by badMania; 04-09-2012 at 04:59 AM.
04-09-2012, 08:45 AM #24
I was at the Macau GPG event a few years ago. (i think it was 2008, but i am not sure.) LCW was playing against Taufik. And guess what. The stadium was 95% empty. There was only a few dozen people watching. It was embarrassing. The organizer got lots of money, but they couldn't find people to come to watch.
And then there was the 2007 Super Series Masters Final. It had to be cancelled because BWF couldn't find enough sponsors. And that was beyond embarrassing.
I hope the above would never happen again in badminton.
04-09-2012, 09:55 AM #25
The 2010 Macau Open GPG was also empty....even though it was held at the Venetian Macau.
They just prefer to gamble rather than watching badminton. So, hopefully Macau will not be given the SS slot.
04-09-2012, 12:11 PM #26
interestingly, Guangzhou has produced many gold medalists of Olympics, World Championship and All England. With a population of 10 millions, I don't understand why Guangzhou doesn't have its own SS or GPG event.
04-09-2012, 01:17 PM #27
04-09-2012, 01:22 PM #28
It is a good idea for the Philippines to have 1 Junior Future Series and Thailand to have 1 Junior International Series....
badMania... I know we are talking about future possibilites in this thread... I just wanna note that in the current rulebook, BAC is allowed to get 2 Junior IC, 5 Junior IS, and virtually limitless Junior FS.
04-09-2012, 01:31 PM #29
Helping the inactive countries to grow and popularize the game, though difficult, is admirable. But to penalize the active, though numerically small countries like SIN, which have supported the world body all these years is not a way to go.
This is like the "big" countries trying to bully the small countries just because of their sheer size. Without big ticket events like the SS, the popularity of the game will be adversely affected in such hitherto active but smaller countries.
Now the "big boys" are already ahead with the SS Premier in addition to having the equivalent of SS, Masters or GP which attract many top players. One could argue that such "big boys" should not be favoured if the objective is to spread badminton's popularity in all
corners of the globe.
BWF should not be seen as discriminating against small countries which have made good
contributions in the past. SIN has often been cited as an excellent venue to host big events. If the discrimination is carried out this will be akin to what has been described earlier as tantamounting to being "racist" in the US example on sponsorship.
So don't use big country, big population to discriminate against the small ones.
Last edited by Loh; 04-09-2012 at 01:36 PM.
04-09-2012, 01:36 PM #30
04-09-2012, 02:20 PM #31
LOL ! I think most of the successful players come from the Jiangsu province and here are the examples:
04-09-2012, 07:36 PM #32
04-09-2012, 07:42 PM #33
Guangzhou has also hosted Thomas Cup.
Guangzhou is a city that likes badminton a lot!
04-09-2012, 08:05 PM #34
By danielwong in forum China Masters / Japan Open 2009Replies: 261: 09-28-2009, 08:08 AM
By LI De Quan in forum Thailand Open 2007 / China Open (1) 2007 / Philippines Open 2007Replies: 117: 07-15-2007, 10:11 AM
By X Ball in forum Thailand Open 2007 / China Open (1) 2007 / Philippines Open 2007Replies: 38: 07-15-2007, 05:43 AM
By ants in forum Thailand Open 2007 / China Open (1) 2007 / Philippines Open 2007Replies: 0: 06-22-2007, 02:49 PM
By Kai91 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 12-11-2004, 10:52 AM