Li Yongbo's dilemma

Discussion in 'Olympics LONDON 2012' started by AlanY, Apr 26, 2012.

  1. AlanY

    AlanY Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    238
    Location:
    England
    I've complied last 2 years' h2h between the top 4 WS against the next 4 below.
    The most impressive is WYH lost only once in 2 years over 16 matches.
    WSX is the worst with only a 58.8% winning ratio.
    The tables also show the winning ratio of the top Chinese against the others, and vice visa.
    Li Yongbo is in the most enviable position that he has to leave one of the top 4 player at home.
    It’s a no brainer if he just considers the h2h of his players.
    Are there any other factors for him to pick WSX ahead of LXR?

    [TABLE="class: grid"]
    [TR]
    [TD][TABLE]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD]Saina Nehwal[/TD]
    [TD]Tine Baun[/TD]
    [TD]Juliane Schenk[/TD]
    [TD]Cheng Shao Chieh[/TD]
    [TD]total[/TD]
    [TD]winning %[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Yihan[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]4 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]4 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]15 - 1[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]93.8%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Xin[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]1 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 3[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]76.9%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Li Xuerui[/TD]
    [TD]3 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]3 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 3[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]76.9%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Shixian[/TD]
    [TD]1 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]1 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]3 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 7[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]58.8%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]total[/TD]
    [TD]11 - 5[/TD]
    [TD]12 - 4[/TD]
    [TD]14 - 3[/TD]
    [TD]8 - 4[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]winning %[/TD]
    [TD]31.3%[/TD]
    [TD]25.0%[/TD]
    [TD]17.6%[/TD]
    [TD]33.3%[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]


    [TABLE="class: grid"]
    [TR]
    [TD][TABLE]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD]Saina Nehwal[/TD]
    [TD]Tine Baun[/TD]
    [TD]Juliane Schenk[/TD]
    [TD]Cheng Shao Chieh[/TD]
    [TD]total[/TD]
    [TD]winning %[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Yihan[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]4 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]4 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]15 - 1[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]93.8%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Xin[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]1 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 3[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]76.9%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Li Xuerui[/TD]
    [TD]3 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]3 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 3[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]76.9%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]total[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 3[/TD]
    [TD]11 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]9 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 1[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]winning %[/TD]
    [TD]23.1%[/TD]
    [TD]15.4%[/TD]
    [TD]10.0%[/TD]
    [TD]16.7%[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]


    [TABLE="class: grid"]
    [TR]
    [TD][TABLE]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD]Saina Nehwal[/TD]
    [TD]Tine Baun[/TD]
    [TD]Juliane Schenk[/TD]
    [TD]Cheng Shao Chieh[/TD]
    [TD]total[/TD]
    [TD]winning %[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Yihan[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]4 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]4 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]15 - 1[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]93.8%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Xin[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]2 - 1[/TD]
    [TD]1 - 0[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 3[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]76.9%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]Wang Shixian[/TD]
    [TD]1 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]1 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]5 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]3 - 2[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 7[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]58.8%[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]total[/TD]
    [TD]8 - 4[/TD]
    [TD]10 - 3[/TD]
    [TD]11 - 3[/TD]
    [TD]6 - 2[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR="class: grid"]
    [TD]winning %[/TD]
    [TD]33.3%[/TD]
    [TD]23.1%[/TD]
    [TD]21.4%[/TD]
    [TD]25.0%[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
     
    #1 AlanY, Apr 26, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2012
  2. Miqilin7

    Miqilin7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Wang Xin's super inconsistency is another factor LYB must seriously consider...

    Wang Shixian's fighting spirit as well as her good record against other minor players can be taken in account..

    Li Xuerui is definitely in unless what she has done in the past few weeks have brilliantly deceived us all.
     
  3. jamesd20

    jamesd20 Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    5,436
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    Construction
    Location:
    Leeds, UK
    I think performances against other danger players further down the list would also take some consideration. It is ok being able to beat the top players, but you must get to the later rounds to be able to beat them.
     
  4. huangtaiji

    huangtaiji Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Isle of Man
    If you imagine the worst possible scenario for WS, if Wang Yihan and Wang Xin both choked in the Olympic Games...for China, it is still better to have a medal in bag rather than none. I would personally prefer to keep Wang Shixian in the squad as she has managed to reach the semifinals consistently. Whether she is able to overcome the top opponents, that's leaves to how hard she trained and prepared herself.

    Li Xuerui hasn't been put under such pressure when all fails, she has to take the sole responsibility as the flag bearer.
     
  5. huangtaiji

    huangtaiji Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Isle of Man
    You should also compile the records of all four players' progression in the SS tournaments for the past two years to compare who has consistently made it to the final or have been inconsistently beaten in the early rounds.

    That's another big factor to look at though the draw is quite subjective for an evaluation is concerned
     
  6. AlanY

    AlanY Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    238
    Location:
    England
    Li Xuerui chalked up another victory over Schenk and that should be the final nail in the coffin for Wang Shixian’s dream for 2012 and the end of Li Yongbo’s dilemma, or is it?

    Now Chen Jin also eligible for London Mr Li has another dilemma as to send all 3 or just 2 and leave 1 home. It’s a far-fetched and definitely a bold move if he decided to do so.

    To have all 3 going to 2012 London the OLY rules dictate that LCW and LD will be in opposite halves and CL and CJ to draw lots to decide with halves they will be in, i.e. a 50/50 chance to face LCW in SF according to the seeding.

    If China only sends 2 players, LCW and LD will still be the same in opposite halves with the second MS (CL or CJ) in LCW’s half.

    This is really depends on the valuations of CL and CJ’s chance against LCW. For argument’s sake let’s say CJ has zero chance against LCW then the only option is leave him home thus avoid the 50/50 chance for a free ticket to the final for LCW.

    Even if CL is say 20% better chance than CJ (or other way round) against LCW it’s still worth to leave the other home. The only disadvantage is LD has to play a non-Chinese in the SF which is not a big deal. He has to if CL or CJ couldn’t get into the SF anyway.

    It’s also a psychological advantage by telling LCW that China doesn’t rely on the draw but already decided who to play in the SF and final.

    It’s definitely a BOLD move to send 2 instead of 3 players to the Olympics, but if anyone can Li Yongbo can.
     
  7. jamesd20

    jamesd20 Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    5,436
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    Construction
    Location:
    Leeds, UK
    Maybe he didnt think of this option? otherwise why send CJ to AUS and he works so hard to get qulified?

    I think 3 will still go. Don't think CL has chance either anyway.
     
  8. Miqilin7

    Miqilin7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    I wouldn't put too much faith on Chen Long if I were LYB. He is expected to get upset again based on his recent form. So it's safe to conclude Chen Jin will go to London as a safety in case Lin Dan or Chen Long fails. Chen Jin could actually deliver in a major event which he has repeatedly done so since 2008
     
  9. AlanY

    AlanY Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    238
    Location:
    England
    that's exactly what i'm saying, if LYB think either CL or CJ has to chance to beat LCW he should leave him home.
     
  10. Miqilin7

    Miqilin7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    3 Chinese is better than 2 Chinese...moreover...it will be extremely dumb and oversight of LYB to just concentrate his actions on LCW alone...that's not a very wise management decision..
     
  11. Miqilin7

    Miqilin7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Of course he is smart man..he couldnt let LCW's fiery form clouds his judgement..
     
  12. AlanY

    AlanY Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    238
    Location:
    England
    not necessary.

    let say MS2 has a 100% winning chance against LCW and MS3 has a 0%.
    to have 3 players it's a 50/50 chance to win or lose the SF, but with 2 players it's 100% certainty.

    sometime less is better
     
  13. Miqilin7

    Miqilin7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    That's for Lin Dan to finish the storyline.....
     
  14. edwin

    edwin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2002
    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Computer Programmer
    Location:
    Toronto
    I thought there is still a rule that says the top 2 players in the same country needs to be in the opposite side of the draws - even with the group play.

    Because LCW and LD are seeded #1 and #2, they for sure will be on the opposite side of the draws. By default, this means CL has to be in the same side of the draw as LCW, regardless whether CJ qualified or not.
     
  15. jamesd20

    jamesd20 Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    5,436
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    Construction
    Location:
    Leeds, UK
    I agree, but I wouldnt say CL or CJ has much more chance than the other over LCW, it is not the 100/0 ratio certainly.

    Moreso I would favour CJ to beat most when it matters. He is pretty reliable in that sense. CL not proven in this respect yet.
     
  16. edwin

    edwin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2002
    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Computer Programmer
    Location:
    Toronto
    Further to what I've said, please refer to section 4.1 (especially 4.1.1) of this document

    http://www.bwfbadminton.org/file_download.aspx?id=41436&tid=1

    The rule does confirm that if LD, CL, and CJ all go to the Olympics, CL is guarantee to be in same half as LCW.
     
  17. AlanY

    AlanY Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,133
    Likes Received:
    238
    Location:
    England
    I've asked and confirmed by a bwf umpire that in the case of China now, MS2 & MS3 will be in a draw to decide
     
  18. huangkwokhau

    huangkwokhau Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    18,486
    Likes Received:
    87
    Occupation:
    sales & design
    Location:
    everywhere
    That's good dilemma ....not a bad one.
    I think LXR will go to OG beside WYH....now LYB will decide WX or WSX...I think WX has a better chance...
     
    #18 huangkwokhau, Apr 29, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2012
  19. huangkwokhau

    huangkwokhau Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    18,486
    Likes Received:
    87
    Occupation:
    sales & design
    Location:
    everywhere
    You are correct...CL can fall into LD or LCW....
     
  20. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    23,845
    Likes Received:
    4,811
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box
    3 will definitely go. It doesn't matter whether CL or CJ play LCW. If it gets to a semifinal like that, then the objective of the chinese player is to tire out LCW. For the other CHN-CHN semifinal, it's to give a walkover.


    Have to agree there.
     

Share This Page