User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 48
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Pandora
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default LEE chongwei and CHEN long will be in the same top half of the draw

    In fact lcw will be placed at Group A of Top Half, LD will be placed at Group P of Bottom Half
    And CL will be placed at Group E of Top Half,CJ will be placed at Group L of Bottom Half


    lcw and cl will be in the same top half of the draw.
    ld and cj will be in the same bottom half of the draw.



    Because

    Read this file in BWF website
    Part_III_Section_6B_-_Olympics_-_Regulations_for_competition_changes_made__24_apri l.pdf
    http://www.bwfbadminton.org/file_dow...d=347510&tid=1


    a) Seed No. 1 placed at the top of Group A
    b) Seed No. 2 placed at the top of Group P
    so lcw will be placed at Group A ,ld will be placed at Group P

    c) No. 3 and 4 drawn by lot at the top of Groups E and L.
    read 4.1



    4.1. Entries from any one NOC shall be drawn as follows:

    4.1.1. the first and second ranked entries by lot in opposite halves of the draw
    so LD and CL will be in opposite halves of the draw
    so .................
    Last edited by sportstar; 06-20-2012 at 01:06 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,800
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    no, LCW has a 50/50 chance to be in the same half as CL.

    related posts;

    Quote Originally Posted by edwin View Post
    Further to what I've said, please refer to section 4.1 (especially 4.1.1) of this document

    http://www.bwfbadminton.org/file_dow...id=41436&tid=1

    The rule does confirm that if LD, CL, and CJ all go to the Olympics, CL is guarantee to be in same half as LCW.
    Quote Originally Posted by AlanY View Post
    I've asked and confirmed by a bwf umpire that in the case of China now, MS2 & MS3 will be in a draw to decide
    Quote Originally Posted by huangkwokhau View Post
    You are correct...CL can fall into LD or LCW....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,800
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    that may not be the exact wording of the regulations but definitely to the spirit of them.

    the whole idea is to stop countries with multiple qualifiers to position themselves in the draws to their advantage.

  4. Likes gundamzaku liked this post
  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Pandora
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Do you read this file?
    Part_III_Section_6B_-_Olympics_-_Regulations_for_competition_changes_made__24_apri l.pdf
    http://www.bwfbadminton.org/file_dow...d=347510&tid=1


    website:
    http://www.bwfbadminton.org/page.aspx?id=14900
    Read more on Regulations Badminton competiton updated 24 April 2012


    4.1. Entries from any one NOC shall be drawn as follows:

    4.1.1. the first and second ranked entries by lot in opposite halves of the draw

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,800
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    of course i have, as i said that been confirmed by a bwf umpire and rudy as well, which is just as good.

    if you follow the wording exactly we would have the No 1 and 2 seeds meet in the MS SF, again im sure not in the spirit of the reg.
    my guess is at the beginning they didnt expect any NOC could have more than 2 players qualify for the singles.
    and China done it twice in both men and women singles.
    Last edited by AlanY; 06-20-2012 at 01:26 PM.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Pandora
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlanY View Post
    of course i have, as i said that been confirmed by a bwf umpire and rudy as well, which is just as good.

    if you follow the wording exactly we would have the No 1 and 2 seeds meet in the MS SF, again im sure not in the spirit of the reg.
    my guess is at the beginning they didnt expect any NOC could have more than 2 players qualify for the singles.
    and China done it twice in both men and women singles.
    You and that BWF umpire who you asked didn't understand regulation correctly.
    the No 1 and 2 seeds meet in the SF that will not happen even if one NOC have 3 entries.

    for example
    ws draw
    seed No.1 and No.2 are both Chinese team players.
    they are the first and second ranked entries of China NOC
    According to
    Part_III_Section_6B_-_Olympics_-_Regulations_for_competition_changes_made__24_apri l.pdf
    http://www.bwfbadminton.org/file_dow...d=347510&tid=1


    a) Seed No. 1 placed at the top of Group A
    b) Seed No. 2 placed at the top of Group P
    4.1. Entries from any one NOC shall be drawn as follows:

    4.1.1. the first and second ranked entries by lot in opposite halves of the draw.
    Seed No.1 will be placed at Group A of top half
    Seed No.2 will be placed at Group P of bottom half
    They are in opposite halves of the draw.

    No. 3 and No.4 Saina NEHWAL will draw by lot at the top of Groups E and L.



    ------------------------------------------------------------
    MS draw is different with ws draw.
    Seed NO.1 LEE chongwei and No.2 LIN dan come from different NOC.
    This is different with ws

    According to
    a) Seed No. 1 placed at the top of Group A
    b) Seed No. 2 placed at the top of Group P

    LEE chongwei will be in group A of top half.
    LIN dan will be in group P of bottom half.
    Their positions has been confirmed. remember this


    Seed No.2 lindan and seed No.3 chenlong both come from China NOC.
    they are the first and second ranked entries of China NOC.

    According to
    4.1.1. the first and second ranked entries by lot in opposite halves of the draw.
    Chen long will be placed at the opposite half to lindan's position.
    Chen long can only be placed at top half because lindan's position has been confirmed[read "remember this"].


    And according to
    c) No. 3 and 4 drawn by lot at the top of Groups E and L.
    Group L is at the bottom half.
    So Chen long can only be placed at Groups E of top half.


    Chen jin can only be placed at Groups L because the position of seed No.3 has been confirmed.
    Last edited by sportstar; 06-20-2012 at 04:57 PM.

  8. Likes kelana liked this post
  9. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    UK / Belgium
    Posts
    440
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    First and second rank belong to LCW and LD ... I don't understand how you're managing to squeeze 3 people into 2 places ...

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Pandora
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SolsticeOfLight View Post
    First and second rank belong to LCW and LD ... I don't understand how you're managing to squeeze 3 people into 2 places ...
    4.1. Entries from any one NOC shall be drawn as follows:

    4.1.1. the first and second ranked entries by lot in opposite halves of the draw


    red words




  11. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Pandora
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Li yongbo has confirmed this draw.
    He said "chen long will meet in sf with lee chongwei."
    news in april 18
    http://news.xinhuanet.com/sports/201..._122996290.htm

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    624
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    4.1.3. the ranking of entries from an NOC can be amended by the seeding. If this is done a new ranking order is implicitly established and should be used for the purposes of Regulation 4.1

    What i understand of this is lin dan is amending the ranking of his country as his seeding of 2 means he has to stay in bottom half of draw at bottom. The amended ranking for his countrymen who are left is Chen long rank 1 and Chen Jin rank 2. Now go back to regulation 4.1 to see what to do with them
    4.1.1. the first (chen long)and second(chen jin) ranked entries by lot in opposite halves of the draw;

    By lot means drawn out of a hat basically so either chen long or chen jin could be up against LCW in semi. But they will be in opposite side of the draw.

    Although to look at it in another way - the rules are so badly written 4.1.2. the third ranked entry by lot in one of the two remaining quarters / groups
    You can only qualify 3 of same NOC if they are all in the top 4 so an amendment will always be done, in effect there will never be a 3rd ranked player from a NOC.
    The other problem with 4.1.2 is if I have misinterpreted rule 4.1.3 and simply as it says an NOC'S rank 1 and 2 on opposite sides of the draw then that only leaves 1 quarter for noc rank 3 to go in so - the third ranked entry by lot in one of the two remaining quarters makes no sense
    Either way rule 4.1.2 needs to be addressed
    Last edited by craigandy; 06-20-2012 at 07:30 PM.

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    u.s.a.
    Posts
    19,157
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    originally i thought the setup would be the regular/standard 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 (semis scenario)..
    but now after reading the wordings in the BWF regulation, it does make sense in having LCW and CL in the same half...

    ..although what were told by Hauge and overheard by AlanY make it even more confusing..?

    Either that, or the BWF folks were confused and/or didn't know what they were thinking/writing when they wrote the rule..?

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    33,609
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ctjcad View Post
    originally i thought the setup would be the regular/standard 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 (semis scenario)..
    but now after reading the wordings in the BWF regulation, it does make sense in having LCW and CL in the same half...

    ..although what were told by Hauge and overheard by AlanY make it even more confusing..?

    Either that, or the BWF folks were confused and/or didn't know what they were thinking/writing when they wrote the rule..?
    BWF don't have 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3 rule.

    the rule says 1 and 2 are in different halves, 3 and 4 are drawn into the remaining quarters "by lots" (randomly). same for the 5-8 seeds. that's why you see seeds are refered to as 3/4 seeds and 5/8.

  15. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    u.s.a.
    Posts
    19,157
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    BWF don't have 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3 rule.

    the rule says 1 and 2 are in different halves, 3 and 4 are drawn into the remaining quarters "by lots" (randomly). same for the 5-8 seeds. that's why you see seeds are refered to as 3/4 seeds and 5/8.
    yah, i figured that..
    but after reading the BWF ruling abt having the top 2 ranked players from the same national team being put in different halves, then it's pretty much clear, it will be LCW vs. CL in the Semis if they reach that far..

  16. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    624
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ctjcad View Post
    yah, i figured that..
    but after reading the BWF ruling abt having the top 2 ranked players from the same national team being put in different halves, then it's pretty much clear, it will be LCW vs. CL in the Semis if they reach that far..
    If this is True and Lin Dan and Chen long are rank 1 & 2(no amendment made) that means Chen Jin is country rank 3 yes. The rules state 3rd rank from NOC is drawn by lot so if what you are saying is true, chen Jin could be in same half with Chen long and LCW.

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    11,896
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As I understand it, from the 2008 OG, it was 1st and 2nd seed on opposite halves. Then 3rd & 4th seeds draw lots. In 2008 China also had 3 MS in top 4. So it could either be Chen Long or Chen Jin.
    If 3rd or 4th seed are Chen Long and PG(or any players from other countries), then yeah, CL has to be different half of the draw than LD. Now both are China, there are only 2 halves, so naturally there will be 2 China MS in one half, just like 2008

  18. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    CT,USA
    Posts
    252
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This looks possible. Is it possible that LCW will have play both chen jin and chen long ?

  19. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    33,609
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sportstar View Post
    Li yongbo has confirmed this draw.
    He said "chen long will meet in sf with lee chongwei."
    news in april 18
    http://news.xinhuanet.com/sports/201..._122996290.htm
    let's hope LYB didn't mis-interpret the rules. otherwise, i cannot imagine the fit he will throw when he realize it.

  20. Likes gundamzaku liked this post
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What excuse will Chen Jin or Chen Long have in the semifinal?
    By Cheung in forum Hong Kong Open / China Open 2011
    Replies: 12
    : 11-18-2011, 10:45 PM
  2. Chen Long Shoes!
    By Perfektion in forum Clothing & Footwear
    Replies: 8
    : 10-29-2011, 11:47 AM
  3. Who is better Chen Long or Chen Jin?
    By lilyaks in forum China Professional Players
    Replies: 9
    : 09-20-2011, 05:29 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    : 06-05-2011, 05:09 AM
  5. who else want to see Chen Long win the HK open?
    By zerosum88 in forum China Open / Hong Kong Open / India GP 2010
    Replies: 46
    : 12-17-2010, 02:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •