User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,781
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Children's training: head heavy or balanced racquet

    If you were training any person up in basic technique from beginner level, does it make any difference giving them a head heavy racquet or a balanced racquet? How about the flex?

    Overall, in the long term, what would be better for them?

    Head heavy racquet may be harder to control but if you train a beginner up to very good level, they wouldn't notice it being any different right?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vancouver Canada
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am no expert but speaking from experience, I have found executing different strokes are far easier with even balance toward head light rackets. Head heavy rackets not only slow down the learning process but also harsh on the wrist. I would definitely choose flexible even balance or head light rackets for children to learn and practice different skills until they are ready for something stiffer & heavier down the road.

  3. #3
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,725
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmm. Let's see. How about the diametric opposite of LCW, ie. headlight and flexy.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,951
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How young a child are we talkingabout?
    If it is a young child (8 or less) I would humbly suggest a short junior-sized racket. An appropriate length is more constructive than for them to learn the proper strokes. A long adult sized racket for a small child is like an adult trying to learn strokes using a fishing rod.

    I would go for balanced to slightly head-heavy. Again, learning the strokes is more important than needing to clear baseline to baseline in the first year. As for stiffness, I don't think it matters that much. In the old days kids learned on cheap steel and wood rackets which were pretty stiff.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheung View Post
    If you were training any person up in basic technique from beginner level, does it make any difference giving them a head heavy racquet or a balanced racquet? How about the flex?

    Overall, in the long term, what would be better for them?

    Head heavy racquet may be harder to control but if you train a beginner up to very good level, they wouldn't notice it being any different right?
    Head light and flexible shaft.

    Keep on top of any incorrect grips. Show them how to squeeze the grip at contact to give more zip into the hit.

    Show them the ready position, over exaggerate it when demonstrating. Static feeds, and make sure they adopt the ready position, ie, racket paused before the hitting cycle.. These few basic tips are key to progressing nicely.

    Show them how to throw.

    Good luck

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    222
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coachgary View Post
    Head light and flexible shaft.
    Agreed,

    Most kids beginners don't have the strength/technique to do full court clears. Head light racquets take less strength to swing and a flexible shaft gives the whip effect at slow swing speeds.

    As players get stronger & have better technique their swing speed increases & reaches a natural limit.
    Players can then switch to head heavy racquets This carries more momentum due to the extra weight which results in more power.

    A "strong" player with a flexible racquet may end up hitting the shuttle with the shaft loaded/flexed and not springing back. That's wasted energy so they switch to a stiffer racquet which springs back quicker.

    It's like hammer vs a sledge hammer.
    A child would barely be able to lift/use a sledge hammer, a big man can't swing a hammer much faster than a sledgehammer as he's limited by the biomechanics of his arms.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,781
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the advice

  8. #8
    New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    House
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For small children (so not tall), the length of the racket should approximate the length of the arm. It makes hand-eye coordination easier.

    The shaft of a racket should be as flexible as it can be (given a certain price). It stimulates proper technique (and de-emphasises muscle strength).

    As for the discussion between head light versus head heavy rackets:
    (1) A head light racket leads to having more fun with racket and shuttle, because the children will be able to swing the racket and hit the shuttle much sooner. The negative consequences are unstable stroke techniques, because head light rackets lack inertia. (Keep in mind that the unstable stroke techniques are more pronounced the more a child's muscles are developed.)
    (2) A head heavy rackets leads to a more stable stroke technique due to the inertia such a racket has. A similar effect can be observed with children having played tennis: their *basic* stroke movement is stable and well-developed. The downside to head heavy rackets is the difficulty accelerating the racket head. So a head heavy racket reduces the acceleration of the racket head towards to shuttle, but it increases the stability of the racket head (because it reduces the acceleration in a sideways direction).

    In summary, it's a trade-off. It will depend on whether you're able to properly deal with the negative aspects.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default How about letting the kid decide

    How about letting the kid try a few swing with different rackets?

    After all, I think it's not about you choosing the rackets, but which racket choose you.


    There are some rackets, despite impossible pricing, just don't feel good to me
    (Referring to Z-Slash)

    While some racket just feel great as soon as I hold it.
    (Referring to my first purchase, Muscle Power 55... Sadly, because of poor sales, they stop producing anymore after the first batch I heard)

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Don't forget LOWER STRING TENSION ... for kids, best to let them use 18-20 lbs with 20 lbs being the maximum until they are, say 16-17 years old ....

    I tried with my kid to go beyond 20 lbs, (up to 22) and the hardness got to him, loss of power etc ... even got his wrist sprained !! Now, I restring (BG66) back to 20 x 21, all is well again. I decided to let him use the "whippier" (repulsive) BG66 based on the fact that at his age (9 y o), he needs all the "power" assistance that the racquet and string can give him.

    I started my kid with Carbonex 8000Ti (slight head light, medium flex, 3U G5) and got him a Voltric 7 (IMHO, the most head-light of the head-heavy Voltric series, medium flex, 4U G5) He can alternate between either one but has shown a preference towards Voltric unlike his old man, who is a die-hard Carbonex user ... Personally, I avoided introducing him to the head-light racquets of Nanospeed or Nanoray, as I know in the long term, his game will be more offensive based, so gently eased him into even-balanced or slight head-heavy.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    178
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Don't forget LOWER STRING TENSION ... for kids, best to let them use 18-20 lbs with 20 lbs being the maximum until they are, say 16-17 years old ....

    I tried with my kid to go beyond 20 lbs, (up to 22) and the hardness got to him, loss of power etc ... even got his wrist sprained !! Now, I restring (BG66) back to 20 x 21, all is well again. I decided to let him use the "whippier" (repulsive) BG66 based on the fact that at his age (9 y o), he needs all the "power" assistance that the racquet and string can give him.
    If you kid has the right hitting technique and plays like 3 times a week (to keep the right hitting timing for high tension), it can take tensions beyond 20 lbs...

    My brother started when he was 5 years old his first racket was an arc 7 strung with BG 65 at 24lbs, and since he was 7 years old he played with the Li Ning N77(4u, medium stiff, even balanced) at tensions from 26 to 30 lbs (BG 65). Now at 10 years and his favorite tension is 27.5 lbs (BG 65/NBG 95) still N77. And he can do all full court strokes even back hand clear.

    And in this 5 year he was not even once injured or got any pain in his wrist, muscles or joints!

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greblu View Post
    If you kid has the right hitting technique and plays like 3 times a week (to keep the right hitting timing for high tension), it can take tensions beyond 20 lbs...

    My brother started when he was 5 years old his first racket was an arc 7 strung with BG 65 at 24lbs, and since he was 7 years old he played with the Li Ning N77(4u, medium stiff, even balanced) at tensions from 26 to 30 lbs (BG 65). Now at 10 years and his favorite tension is 27.5 lbs (BG 65/NBG 95) still N77. And he can do all full court strokes even back hand clear.

    And in this 5 year he was not even once injured or got any pain in his wrist, muscles or joints!
    WOW !! I am speechless .... much more than majority of fully grown adult players !!

    Personally, I would not recommend any children to take such RISKS ... can be dangerous ...

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    240
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Here's my daughter with Apacs Lethal 70, BG80, 28lbs at 11 months old. Now she's 2.5 years but still with the same racket. http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...inton-Champion

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd give that child a heavy beast racquet thats stiffer than a pure carbon shaft. That way they'd be building some beast level strength

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,474
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What about the RSL Evo with the WPS? It changes as the child grows.

Similar Threads

  1. mid-flex/flexible shaft + balanced a little head heavy + 4U weight= ???
    By Kannan Moorthy in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 8
    : 07-21-2012, 01:15 PM
  2. WTB: Even balanced/ slight head heavy, midflex/ midstiff racket (Singapore)
    By asdsadas2008 in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 07-13-2012, 09:13 AM
  3. Looking for a even balanced to head heavy racket
    By LD rules! in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 9
    : 07-07-2010, 06:38 AM
  4. head heavy/head light/even balanced
    By hahahalol in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 14
    : 05-04-2005, 05:00 AM
  5. Head-heavy/Handle-heavy/Balanced eackets
    By ari in forum General Forum
    Replies: 1
    : 03-28-2001, 01:00 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •