User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Arcsaber-ZSlash TH or AT900P

    I'm looking for a attacking racquet that is not heavy.
    which or the above mention is suitable for me?

  2. #2
    Regular Member speedyJT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What is "not heavy" for you?
    The weight of both rackets is nearly the same.
    There are quite more attacking rackets like that.
    (Take a look at the Voltric-Series, too)

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Selangor
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by holytoa View Post
    I'm looking for a attacking racquet that is not heavy.
    which or the above mention is suitable for me?
    what about nanoray or arcsaber series??

    Quote Originally Posted by speedyJT View Post
    What is "not heavy" for you?
    The weight of both rackets is nearly the same.
    There are quite more attacking rackets like that.
    (Take a look at the Voltric-Series, too)
    i think he wants an attacking racket but a head light racket.....

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,231
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's a difference between weight and balance.

    A very lightweight racquet can feel very head heavy. I have a 4U MP88, very light but when swung, feels very head heavy.

    The AT900P is head heavy (but not excessively). ArcZS is even balance. Going just by what you said you're probably better off with the ArcZS.

    But as someone said above, there are other racquets to consider too... give a little more info on what you prefer and I think you'll get better responses.

  5. #5
    Regular Member speedyJT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunnersfan View Post
    what about nanoray or arcsaber series??



    i think he wants an attacking racket but a head light racket.....
    ArcSaber would be okay... ArcSaber 10 is okay, Z-Slash would be better!

    Nanoray is definitly not an attacking racket...

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Selangor
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by speedyJT View Post
    ArcSaber would be okay... ArcSaber 10 is okay, Z-Slash would be better!

    Nanoray is definitly not an attacking racket...
    i know, but remember he said "not heavy"...
    Arcsaber 10 and Arcsaber Z-Slash is slightly head heavy....
    that's why i included nanoray.....
    based on racket chart, the latest nanoray 800 close to even balance and it give good repulsion abilities....
    so, maybe you can turn it to an attacking racket but for sure it wont as powerful as voltric or armortec ranges....

  7. #7
    Regular Member ucantseeme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Germany, Northrhine Westfalia
    Posts
    871
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If your selectzion include the ZS and AT900P, the Nanorays are something different and dismissed.
    Do you play more singles or doubles? IMO the ZS is a good double and singles racket. The AT900P is a bit sluggish due the head heavyness. You can go for a 4U AT900P which is lighter and a bit faster. Maybe the a 4U AT900T is the answer. Or a 4U VT80.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    73
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I played with at900p and it rly is heqvy..i developped issues with it so i changed to.mx 80. Z slash is a much harder racket to play with. Most people who use zs only use it because it has somewhat anormal dimensions :-P. But yah both are pretty head heavy so if your looking for something not too heavy id check somewhere else !

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i'm looking for a not head heavy racquet.
    i play mostly doubles as i always go to social badminton sesh.
    Play singles only towards to end session when every1 is tired and wants to go home.

    looks like i'm looking at at900p now.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    73
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default at900

    Again at900p is a very tiring racket...it gives great smash but pretty head heavy. Now if you still want that i have one for sale, used at900p only one paint scratch 140 cd...inbox me for details

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Maritime canada
    Posts
    532
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm not sure why you want the at900p specifically but from what I've read a lot of people seem to call the voltric 80 "an at900p done right". Not saying the at900p doesn't have it's own merits but I believe it is more demanding then voltric 80 and you said you want light so that's as close as you'll get in that class I think.

  12. #12
    Regular Member yerrorice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you play doubles, why don't you get a ns9900? Its smash is actually VERY good with proper technique and skill and its also fast.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,231
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can't believe people are saying the ArcZS is head heavy. I'd suggest developing some strength if you find that too head heavy!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •