User Tag List

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 18 to 34 of 71
  1. #18
    Regular Member gundamzaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Santa Clara County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,496
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    well it might be a bit easier if we know the kind of player you are, the shots you like, the shots you need to work on. besides the fact that you don't like very stiff rackets, we knew nothing about your game. it's good that price is not a factor so we don't have to worry about the budget, just the brand and the way it looks.

    if you have a chance to demo any of the rackets listed above, jump on it!

  2. #19
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Assuming that Nanoray 700F is a typo and you meant the Nanoray 700FX then that racket is listed by yonex as having as Stiff shaft.

  3. #20
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    manchester
    Posts
    164
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yonex nanospeed 100

  4. #21
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappySachs View Post
    Assuming that Nanoray 700F is a typo and you meant the Nanoray 700FX then that racket is listed by yonex as having as Stiff shaft.
    actually the FX = flex
    the racket is medium stiffness (more flexible than the other nanoray 700RP which is stiff)

  5. #22
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nooooooooooo View Post
    actually the FX = flex
    the racket is medium stiffness (more flexible than the other nanoray 700RP which is stiff)
    I own a 700FX, it is MUCH stiffer than my Armortec 50 that is rated as medium flex.

    I also own an Armortec 500 that is rated as stiff, I would place the 700FX as stiffer, although head weight could be the deciding factor in this comparison.

  6. #23
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hahahaa ... I am not at all surprised there is NO CONSENSUS ... IN FACT, I will be worried IF there is an ULTIMATE choice that everyone agrees to as it will imply that racquet development has reached its "end" (zenith) point .... - btw, I still feel that Carbonex 20 is THE "ULTIMATE" graphite-based racquet in badminton (the yardstick and reference point) ...


    Quote Originally Posted by SSSSNT View Post
    Suggestions thus far:

    - Bravesword 11
    - Kason F9
    - MX60
    - Nanospeed 7000
    - Arcsaber 10
    - Bravesword 09
    - NR800
    - Arcsaber 7
    - Nanoray 700F
    - Superwaves 37
    -
    Bravesword 12
    -
    superwave 35
    -
    armortec 900

    With so many suggestions, which one would most people agree is the ultimate all rounder for doubles?
    Last edited by maxout; 09-24-2012 at 07:49 PM.

  7. #24
    Regular Member gundamzaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Santa Clara County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,496
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nooooooooooo View Post
    actually the FX = flex
    the racket is medium stiffness (more flexible than the other nanoray 700RP which is stiff)
    i respectfully disagree, i've played with both back to back and my fx is stiffer than my rp, just my opinion i guess

  8. #25
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    87
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sayshh View Post
    Easy ways that I can think of to make this list shorter:
    1. Brand preference (luckily for you few brands have not entered the picture yet)
    2. Budget
    3. Appearance
    1. Any brand is fine
    2. Any price
    3. Anything but bright pink racket

    Quote Originally Posted by gundamzaku View Post
    well it might be a bit easier if we know the kind of player you are, the shots you like, the shots you need to work on. besides the fact that you don't like very stiff rackets, we knew nothing about your game. it's good that price is not a factor so we don't have to worry about the budget, just the brand and the way it looks.

    if you have a chance to demo any of the rackets listed above, jump on it!
    Just your average player. I think I'm okay at everything but excels at none and usually beat opponent through shot placement. That's why I think I need an all rounder racket cause I need to balance my attack and defense.


    Quote Originally Posted by maxout View Post
    Hahahaa ... I am not at all surprised there is NO CONSENSUS ... IN FACT, I will be worried IF there is an ULTIMATE choice that everyone agrees to as it will imply that racquet development has reached its "end" (zenith) point .... - btw, I still feel that Carbonex 20 is THE "ULTIMATE" graphite-based racquet in badminton (the yardstick and reference point) ...
    I had hoped everyone can find faults with the suggestions above as to why it's not the ultimate all rounder (i.e NS100 is too head heavy to be the ultimate all rounder, or too light, or not light enough, or not enough technology, etc) so it can be cut down.

  9. #26
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SSSSNT View Post
    .... I had hoped everyone can find faults with the suggestions above as to why it's not the ultimate all rounder (i.e NS100 is too head heavy to be the ultimate all rounder, or too light, or not light enough, or not enough technology, etc) so it can be cut down.
    All right, since you asked, so be prepared to ....

    Go and try the venerable and iconic YONEX CARBONEX 20 (or Cab 20 SP as it is called today)... it has been made and still in production since 1985 ... if it is not the best all-rounder (despite its "age" and oval head design), than I don't know what is, since it sits SMACK IN THE MIDDLE of all Yonex racquet charts for EQUAL EVERYTHING since .... wow, that long !!! and each time I test a new Yonex or Victor , ... in my head, I will always ask, ".... hmmm ... how does this feel against my Cab20 that is in the bag ... then I take out my Cab20 to compare and before you know it ... starts playing ... and the "new" racquet remains in the bag hahahahaaa .... !! "

    Give the Cab 20 a GOOD and FAIR try, don't prejudge it because of its "age" or "old tech and oval design" and "old material used (plain old graphite, no fancy nano-this and that ... " ... if you give it a FAIR & UNBIASED TRY, you will love the Cab 20 as the "ULTIMATE" ALL ROUNDER for singles and doubles !! .... how else do you think it can OUTLAST all the other models ....

    I have been using one (well, 3) since 1992 .... and still do so today ...

    PS: The ONLY "BAD" THING that I heard "young" people today say about the Cab20 is that it is "OLD" - old tech, old design, old material, old this, old that , old , my daddy's or grandaddy's generation ... BUT no one that I know after trying it bitched about its swing, response, quickness, weight, balance etc etc etc ... hehehee ... they just say, it is "OLD" .... hehehe ... OLD IS GOLD in this case ...

    Give it the "old" Cab 20 a try ... who knows .... you may love it even more than me !!
    Last edited by maxout; 09-24-2012 at 09:24 PM.

  10. #27
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My mistake, see link below, Cab 20 was released in 1984 not 1985 !! Even older than I thought !! Now I remember why I was so "crazy" about it when I was young - my "hero" - Han Jian was using it then but it has remained truly a great racquet for me (anyway)


    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php/35740-some-info-of-vintage-yonex-rackets?p=424544#post424544
    Last edited by maxout; 09-24-2012 at 10:26 PM.

  11. #28
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is strictly my UNDERSTANDING .... I may be wrong but this is the impression I get ...

    Since the Carbonex 20 (the "LAST" true all rounder racquet), Yonex "seems" to be focusing its R&D efforts in developing racquets FOR SPECIFIC STYLE OF PLAY ...

    Example based on the latest series: Voltric and Armotec (offensive style), Nanoray and Nanospeed (defensive) ...

    From what I can see, Yonex is maintaining the Carbonex series as its ONLY SOLE SERIES in the all-rounder range with the Carbonex 20 sitting at the apex of being truly both offensive and defensive racquet for both singles and doubles - an EVEN- BALANCED and EVEN EVERYTHING racquet ... the latest Carbonex, Cab35 and Cab50 themselves are tweaks with slight inclination on either sides of playing style ...

    So, if you are looking for a TRUE BLUE ALL ROUNDER ... look no further than the Carbonex 20 ... an "old man/woman" of 28 years old (born 1984) !!


    BTW, Carbonex 20 is NOT CHEAP (RRP in Malaysia RM409.90, made in Japan) !! Personally, I have found the Carbonex 8000Ti (RRP RM119.90 - made in Taiwan) to be a good budget alternative to Cab 20 and I am letting my kids used them.
    Last edited by maxout; 09-24-2012 at 10:55 PM.

  12. #29
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    97
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    N55II might be a good choice as well..

  13. #30
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    India
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maxout View Post
    Since the Carbonex 20 (the "LAST" true all rounder racquet), Yonex "seems" to be focusing its R&D efforts in developing racquets FOR SPECIFIC STYLE OF PLAY ...
    Arcsaber series of rackets is what I think Yonex R&D developed (apart from Carbonex) for all-round play.

    To the OP:

    If there are no particular preferences towards brand, price or appearance, the best bet would be to go with all-round rackets such as Arcsaber (say Arc 7?). Another good way to find feedback about similar rackets from other brands is to find out which rackets are similar (Arc 7) from Victor (may be BraveSword).

    Ultimately, the ultimate doubles racket is the one with which you can play your best game.

  14. #31
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    87
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't have the luxury of trying out rackets so I would have to buy it based on theory. I am an average player who do okay in everything, excels in none. Usually beat my opponent through good shuttle placement.

    After theorizing, I conclude that the ultimate all around racket for singles and doubles are different. Since doubles are quicker, I would think a great all around racket would have to be excellent in defense while still good in offense. How about these criteria for a start:


    - 3U head light or 4U even balance
    - Medium flex
    - Isometric frame
    - Speed features (i.e thin shaft, frame)
    - Decent power
    - Excellent for shot placement

    What would be the ultimate racket with these criteria? Or is my theory wrong?

  15. #32
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There is no ultimate doubles racket at all. There is an ultimate signature play style from you. For me, now I'm in love with my ArcSaber 8DX which allows me to play very good doubles games with a bunch of powerful smashes, fast pace, aggressive play style, and maintaining control (drop, slice, net kill...).

  16. #33
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    272
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Carlton Vapour trail tour might be another one to consider, mid flex, mid balance quite light overall but not ridiculously light. I think the 8DX might be a little too stiff for a general all around racket for a "general" player. Might struggle slightly to generate power.

  17. #34
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    malaysia
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    another few i would suggest is wilson blx vertex, super waves 36, arc10, forza ti550 S

    in my opinion
    power: arc10>ti550S=sw36>blx vertex (but blx vertex can pack a mean punch to)
    drives: blx vertex>sw36=ti550S=arc10
    net: blx vertex> sw36=ti550S=arc10
    feel: blx vertex>ti550S>sw36>arc10 (arc10 feels abit mushy or numb)

    in terms of BP arc10>ti550=sw36>vertex. but the vertex itself isnt head light, slightly head heavy. dry bp290mm, i'm getting 300mm wet. arc10 308mm same setup.

    would also suggest apacs slayer 99 but it is very stiff. abit headlight, but awesome for drives, aero frame is fast and has decent power too.

    i am loving the vertex, thinking of getting a spare, or maybe try F9 or mx60, specs seem not too far off.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •