Protech Tournament Grade Shuttlecock

**chng5255** · 10-15-2012, 10:06 AM

I am switching from Sealion C1101 to this. Knowing this grade is currently approved by BWF. Anyone using the same shuttle reviews are welcome.

**davlee** · 10-15-2012, 10:08 AM

Protech shuttlecocks are seeing a decrease in their quality... Just had a session with Protech Masterpiece yesterday and it was so bad... heard that recently, all shuttlecocks are seeing a quality issue including the RSL Classic Tourney...

**chng5255** · 10-15-2012, 06:58 PM

Bad news for badminton lovers then. Either playing with poor shuttlecock or expensive shuttlecocks. What's the alternative then?

**maxout** · 10-15-2012, 07:04 PM

Originally Posted by davlee

Protech shuttlecocks are seeing a decrease in their quality... Just had a session with Protech Masterpiece yesterday and it was so bad... heard that recently, all shuttlecocks are seeing a quality issue including the RSL Classic Tourney...

Except Aerosensa 30, 40 and 50 ... I have switched over from RCL to Yonex and found that it is about 2X more durable (major mishit excluded - just based on normal play), so if you do the maths, works out roughly the same price or even CHEAPER using Yonex (case comparison: Yonex Aerosensa 30 vs RCL Black Silver) ... unbelievable but true in my case !!

**ChongHL** · 11-03-2012, 10:19 AM

Originally Posted by chng5255

I am switching from Sealion C1101 to this. Knowing this grade is currently approved by BWF. Anyone using the same shuttle reviews are welcome.

C1101 Rm55 vs Protect World Class Rm58.

Protect can last 2-3 games compare to Sealion 1.5-2 games.
We play double most of the time and hits a lot.

Tested YY AS40 yesterday, can't even last 1 games.
Quality more or same like Sealion.

Heard that Protect Platinum Rm62 more durable. Can't comment cause not tested yet.