User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    4,257
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default +1 lb or +2 lbs??

    i am now using 24 lbs for both cross and main. i just realise this is not good for racket.

    should i change to 23/25 or 24/25 or 23/24?

    the cross should be higher tension than the main, right?

  2. #2
    Regular Member Blitzzards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    GMT-04:00
    Posts
    1,437
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why is 24x24lbs (or any uniform tension stringing) not good for [the] racquet?

    Does your racquet frame look longer (and horizontally squashed/compressed) or fatter (and vertically squashed/compressed) after stringing compared to the empty unstrung frame (easily verified by measuring the two longest X and Y lengths of your racquet frame)? You have to be careful and understand that if the current uniform tension you use now is giving you the correct frame shape, changing it to any of the three other tensions you suggested my lead to the deformation of the frame, depending on your stringer.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •