Results 1 to 13 of 13
Thread: Midflex Racket
11-28-2012, 07:58 AM #1
Just something curious. Stiffness is how much the racket can bend. So a higher swing speed will need a stiffer racket. So for the Chinese double pair FHF-CY, why are they using a Midflex racket of their Kason C7 and F9. Will they be better with a stiffer racket?
11-28-2012, 08:26 AM #2
11-29-2012, 12:56 AM #3
11-29-2012, 10:09 AM #4
That is really interesting.
As we can read in the Kason F9 review threat - the F9 is really between midflex and flex.
And Fu have one of the hardest/fastest smash in the world....
I don`t think that his smash would more hard if he change to e.g. the very stiff MX80...
For me (advanced player):
midflex: more smash power and easy clear shots
stiff: more defense/repulsion power and more control
That is the reason why I prefer midflex....
greblu liked this post
11-29-2012, 12:24 PM #5
is there any midflex + head heavy racket?
11-29-2012, 12:30 PM #6
In Yonex you have the Voltrics, VT 5, VT 7, VT 70. All head-heavy and mid-flex.
11-29-2012, 02:34 PM #7
Is the Kason F 9 slightly head heavy? I thought midflex and balancend....
11-29-2012, 08:53 PM #8
midflex and headheavy = MX60 and VT70, AT500
12-01-2012, 12:14 AM #9
strong arms can handle stiff racket but flexible racket is for people who can't swing the racket fast. does it mean that a person with stronger arm will smash better with a stiffer racket compare to flexible racket?
12-02-2012, 09:47 AM #10
i like it ,agree with you ,In Yonex you have the Voltrics, VT 5, VT 7, VT 70. All head-heavy and mid-flex
12-02-2012, 10:18 AM #11
12-03-2012, 12:15 AM #12
does it mean, midflex racket is more user friendly while stiff racket is more for good wrist power and stuff?
12-03-2012, 04:14 AM #13