User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    492
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Nanospeed 9900 vs Clone

    Hi Guys,

    I tested out a Nanospeed 9900 clone ($40 from Ebay) against a genuine Nanospeed 9900. I find it a little strange, but I absolutely prefer the clone to the genuine, regardless of price.

    Ignoring the price completely, I find that the clone has more power, is lighter, and has more manueverability than the genuine. I find that the clone has better clears and better smashes, while also being very fun to play at the net in doubles. The genuine 9900 seemed heavier, not as fast, and not as powerful, but of course still a great racket overall.

    I know it sounds crazy...but the clone actually seems to be the better racket in my opinion.

    Anybody else have similar or opposing experiences with clones? Does anybody find a difference between the supposed "class A" vs "class B" clones?

  2. #2
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,568
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Doesn't that just mean NS9900 is not the racket for you ...

    Sure there are several threads on this topic already

  3. #3
    Regular Member dbswansea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    738
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Someone brought a clone to one of our club nights, it was about 5-10mm shorter than the coaches' legit NS9900

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Markam, Ontario
    Posts
    52
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I tried a NS9000 clone few years ago. I found it worked well except for some quality issues (paint job, broken grommets, etc). I ended up bought 3 more from China at a very low price (2 at $12.5). Unfortunately, the material was a bit weaker. I still took my chance to string them at 24lb & they worked fine for a while but cannot last long. I now only have one left.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,634
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zhuangcorp View Post
    Hi Guys,

    I tested out a Nanospeed 9900 clone ($40 from Ebay) against a genuine Nanospeed 9900. I find it a little strange, but I absolutely prefer the clone to the genuine, regardless of price.

    Ignoring the price completely, I find that the clone has more power, is lighter, and has more manueverability than the genuine. I find that the clone has better clears and better smashes, while also being very fun to play at the net in doubles. The genuine 9900 seemed heavier, not as fast, and not as powerful, but of course still a great racket overall.

    I know it sounds crazy...but the clone actually seems to be the better racket in my opinion.

    Anybody else have similar or opposing experiences with clones? Does anybody find a difference between the supposed "class A" vs "class B" clones?
    most likely reason for this is that the clone is more flexy, and this matches your swing better than the stiff genuine 9900.

  6. #6
    Regular Member gundamzaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Santa Clara County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,346
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zhuangcorp View Post
    Hi Guys,

    I tested out a Nanospeed 9900 clone ($40 from Ebay) against a genuine Nanospeed 9900. I find it a little strange, but I absolutely prefer the clone to the genuine, regardless of price.

    Ignoring the price completely, I find that the clone has more power, is lighter, and has more manueverability than the genuine. I find that the clone has better clears and better smashes, while also being very fun to play at the net in doubles. The genuine 9900 seemed heavier, not as fast, and not as powerful, but of course still a great racket overall.

    I know it sounds crazy...but the clone actually seems to be the better racket in my opinion.

    Anybody else have similar or opposing experiences with clones? Does anybody find a difference between the supposed "class A" vs "class B" clones?
    feel of a racket to each person is all different and very subjective. if you actually find the $40 racket wonderful to play with, more power to you, get a bunch in case they break, and you're good to go!!!

  7. #7
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    my mom prefers to drive the VW Golf than the Mercedes. the Golf is smaller and easier to drive in the city.

  8. Likes leo11 liked this post
  9. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    492
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amleto View Post
    most likely reason for this is that the clone is more flexy, and this matches your swing better than the stiff genuine 9900.
    I think you're right that the clone was more flexy than the genuine. But why would the flexy racket be more powerful? I always thought that the stiffer racket is more powerful.

  10. #9
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zhuangcorp View Post
    I think you're right that the clone was more flexy than the genuine. But why would the flexy racket be more powerful? I always thought that the stiffer racket is more powerful.
    stiff racket plus strong technique and muscle are powerful.

    stiff racket plus weak technique and muscle feels like a dead stick.

    it is not a straight line, higher is better, relationship.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •