User Tag List

Page 80 of 110 FirstFirst ... 30 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... LastLast
Results 1,344 to 1,360 of 1855
  1. #1344
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt_Strider View Post
    Haha, or just leave it to you experts to simplify for me?

    After a few short rallies, I can say that this is probably the best 3U racket I've ever used in my life. So much power...I can't say for sure whether I've set any new personal records or not since I don't have a radar gun, but yea, it's definitely as good as any other offensively minded rackets I've used. My day is not done yet. Will post more later!
    I played with the Duoforce intensively for a little more than 2 hours and I'm exhausted. Yes, I have said this is a 3U racket that doesn't feel like any of the 3U rackets that I have used before. Nonetheless, it's still heavier and requires more effort to use than the ArcFB.

    Overall, I have a fairly positive impression of this racket. I don't really have anything new to add. For a detailed review of the Duoforce, you should read Kwun's review. I would agree with most things that he have said. However, this isn't the racket to get if you're a defensively oriented player. Yes, it's more maneuverable than any other offensively oriented racket I have used, but it's still not as good as the ArcSaber FB. You're still going to sacrifice a bit of your defense for an offensively oriented racket.

    I have been quite fortunate that over the past couple of months, I have either briefly used or used on a one week basis of the 3U/4U Voltric 80, ArcSaber i-Slash, NanoRay 800, ArcSaber 11, and ArcSaber FB. I know what I ultimately want in a racket. I didn't had the same options available to me when I bought my AT800 DE. Now I know that I really don't prefer rackets like the AT800 DE. I really like the feel of the Duoforce. It felt good and this racket can deliver a very powerful smash.

    I'm still committed to using this racket for an entire week to see where things will go. Even after the week is up, I will keep the Duoforce for long term use. At this point in time, I still feel the ArcSaber FB is my kind of racket. I honestly feel it makes me a much more rounded player. The racket felt just right and it didn't let me down. Will I still feel the same 6 months from now? I don't know. Maybe at that point, my opinion will change.

    I've gotten a few number of PMs asking for my opinions on both the ArcSaber FB and the Duoforce. Well, here they are and I'm going to avoid telling people which racket to get. Everyone is different. There's no such thing as a perfect racket and they all have flaws. My best advice would be for anyone interested in buying a new racket to demo them or use them briefly to get a feel of what kind of racket will ultimately suit them.

  2. #1345
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    M'sia KL
    Posts
    396
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I shared the same feeling after playing with Duoforce for almost a week.
    Still i prefer my ArcFB more and decided to let go Duoforce to make way for a 5U ArcFB version

  3. #1346
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soulsync View Post
    I shared the same feeling after playing with Duoforce for almost a week.
    Still i prefer my ArcFB more and decided to let go Duoforce to make way for a 5U ArcFB version
    lol, you've sold your Duoforce?

    I don't think I'm going to make a decision like that until I have test it on a long term basis. I really do hope that Adidas will make a FB-like model in the near future.

  4. #1347
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,612
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt_Strider View Post
    lol, you've sold your Duoforce?

    I don't think I'm going to make a decision like that until I have test it on a long term basis. I really do hope that Adidas will make a FB-like model in the near future.
    isn't the adizero pro considered similar to fb, high 5u'ish

  5. #1348
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    isn't the adizero pro considered similar to fb, high 5u'ish
    The characteristics of the two rackets are different. You could buy it and test it for us.

  6. #1349
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    FB and Adizero Por, both are different in the shaft stiffness. I think the BP should be more or less the same between two.

  7. #1350
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    M'sia KL
    Posts
    396
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt_Strider View Post
    lol, you've sold your Duoforce?

    I don't think I'm going to make a decision like that until I have test it on a long term basis. I really do hope that Adidas will make a FB-like model in the near future.
    havent really sold it off yet hahaha but roughly know it doesnt suit my play
    i've spent many hours adjusting to it's swing speed, timing and etc but it just does work
    when im back to my MX80 or ArcFB, it juz clicked
    that's when it is decided

  8. #1351
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    isn't the adizero pro considered similar to fb, high 5u'ish
    It's definitely much heavier Had a go with it and it even felt a tad heavy to me (coming from the Bs09). Maybe I got a heavy one, but even so it'd be much heavier than the FB in a lower weight...

  9. #1352
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j4ckie View Post
    It's definitely much heavier Had a go with it and it even felt a tad heavy to me (coming from the Bs09). Maybe I got a heavy one, but even so it'd be much heavier than the FB in a lower weight...
    It'll still be heavier than a 5U ArcFB.

  10. #1353
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,612
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by j4ckie View Post
    It's definitely much heavier Had a go with it and it even felt a tad heavy to me (coming from the Bs09). Maybe I got a heavy one, but even so it'd be much heavier than the FB in a lower weight...
    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt_Strider View Post
    It'll still be heavier than a 5U ArcFB.
    Then it's perfect
    for those who are waiting for the 4U FB...

  11. #1354
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,796
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Another fail . France was supposed to have the stuff on sale May 15th yet the only thing I come across is a test event June 14th?!?
    Reading now availability has been delayed till end of May, early June ...

    Time for squash then

  12. #1355
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt_Strider View Post
    It'll still be heavier than a 5U ArcFB.
    That's what I said. A low weight AZ Pro will still be much heavier than an Arc FB.

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    Then it's perfect
    for those who are waiting for the 4U FB...
    No, it's perfect for those who want a decent, pretty stiff low-weight racket. The balance is rather head heavy, so it still plays like a balanced racket rather than like a headlight one. Personally I'm skeptical about the 80/81g target weight. A bit more seems more realistic, actually (82-83g average).

  13. #1356
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,612
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^^ Hmmm... that's interesting, because my XP60 has very similar characteristics... pretty stiff, 82.3g, bp300mm... and I looove it.

  14. #1357
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well I only got to play one with sucky strings but to me it was a bit dull and not really powerful. Might be a whole other story with decent strings, but I still guess I'll prefer softer rackets. AP Tour and Precision Tour are definitely on my list to consider if I'm gonna play adidas rackets next season. I'll have to have another go at the AP and Precision Pro, preferably with decent strings, to make a final decision though. Having such a blast with my 'nooby' balanced, mid-stiff racket lately I don't think I'll really come to like a stiff racket though

  15. #1358
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,948
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Precision Pro and Adipower Tour.

    they have somewhat similar specs but plays differently.

    Precision Pro has a more damped feel (more "Yonex" if you may). but still lively on hit, but don't have the same crispness of other Adidas racket.

    Adipower Tour is more characteristics of Adidas: less damped, crisp, good feedback, more soild. feels stiffer than Precision Pro. more powerful.

    out of the two, it is hard to choose. it'd boil down to preference on the feel. for me i like the adipower tour better.

    i tested them using the same string and tension (ZM65@23/25.3)

    out of all the Adidas rackets i got, here are my order of preference:

    adipower duoforce
    adipower tour
    adipower pro
    adizero pro
    precision pro
    precision 88
    switch pro
    adipower force

  16. #1359
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I thought it might have been just the strings, but maybe I had it right all along....my fav was the AP Tour. As I play with the Bs09/12 right now, I'm pretty used to the direct, lively feedback of Victor rackets (the Bs not being very head heavy even increases that imop). I'll have to give the Precision Tour a very thorough testing though, the Bravesword shape is promising, and it wasn't as clumsy as some others.
    Still, I'll have to stay strong and wait until August to make my decision

  17. #1360
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    Then it's perfect
    for those who are waiting for the 4U FB...
    No, it won't be perfect because those are two very distinct rackets. From what I gather, the Adizero Pro is probably more similar to the Voltric 80 than it is to the FB.

Page 80 of 110 FirstFirst ... 30 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •