User Tag List

Page 18 of 59 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... LastLast
Results 290 to 306 of 987
  1. #290
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,252
    Mentioned
    139 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt View Post
    Its plausible. I have not kept up on BP numbers.
    what I was trying to imply was that bp alone doesn't indicate anything without wt

  2. #291
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well,
    Mine was suprisingly with 320mm BP. With G5 grip size, BG66UM string, a layer overgrip on wood...

    After restrung the racket with lower tension,
    It plays much better than before,
    Now I like it already.

    Although the shaft repulsion isn't that good compare to Tenbu,
    but overall it is still very nice.
    Will be keeping it for another while to adjust myself to it.

  3. #292
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, BC
    Posts
    5,209
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    what I was trying to imply was that bp alone doesn't indicate anything without wt
    Yes, thats true. I have swinged the racket but not in gameplay to see how the racket feels to get an idea. Thats was only the G5 one which a friend of mine got.

    Once I get one in the G4, I would be able to get a better idea.

  4. #293
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbswansea View Post
    Those pics are almost pornographic
    I don't want to imagine what you think we are doing with the rackets...

  5. #294
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    OH yeah......look what the UPS man brought me yesterday.


  6. #295
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    76
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dang....now that is racket porn....

    Quote Originally Posted by AZbadman View Post
    OH yeah......look what the UPS man brought me yesterday.


  7. #296
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CarbonexFan View Post
    Today, I picked up my Arcsaber Flash Boost. Initial feel: what an incredible light racket! And the color is better than the pictures I saw before. First I expected a flashy racket, but the blue yellow color is not painted over with a shine lack. It's more the plastic shine/mat color. I have no doubt this racket will be an eye catcher.

    First, I wanted to string it with the bg66u as a recommended string from Yonex, but I did not had any anymore. After reading some specs about my beloved nbg98, I decided to string it with nbg98 in yellow at 11 kg. For reference, it's also easy because all my Arcsabers have been strung with nbg98 at 11 kg, with a few exceptions.

    Attachment 138830

    First thing I noticed, is that the string pattern is not the same as the normal Arcsabers. The two lines on top are placed too high, and it reminded me about stringing the Arcsaber Z-Slash and I-slash. It was very narrow at the top. It's a very slim racket, and almost the same as the Arcsaber 2 Tour.

    Attachment 138831

    I also suspect that the head is more like the Arsaber I-Slash and Z-Slash, but I'm not sure. If I place the Arcsaber 2 Tour above each other, it's clearly that the frame of the Arcsaber FB is smaller:

    Attachment 138832

    Attachment 138833

    The racket I have is a F-G4. The reason I put the Arcsaber 2 Tour against this racket, is because this is currently my lightest Arcsaber in weight and feel. Given the same string and grip, the ARC-FB is a lit head lighter than the Arcsaber 2 Tour. And the 2 Tour is the head lightest Arcsaber I have. Not sure about the exact balance point, but I measure the rackets I have as a complete racket.

    Attachment 138834

    The racket should be available next week over here. I can't wait to play with it this Sunday, which is my next opportunity to play with it.
    To continue the review, I've lend the Arcsaber Z-Slash from my brother to verify the differences between these Arcsaber families.

    Name:  ARCFB06.jpg
Views: 4296
Size:  66.8 KB

    Just as I thought, the Arcsaber FB has a smaller frame compared to the normal Arcsabers. The stringing pattern is the same as from the Arcsaber I-Slash and Z-Slash.

    Name:  ARCFB07.jpg
Views: 5977
Size:  52.5 KB

    But the frame from the Flash Boost is not the same as the Z-Slash. It sits between the normal Arcsabers and the small frames from the slash family. In the picture below, I tried to photograph it. The top of the head from the FB seems to be wider compared to the Z-Slash:

    Name:  ARCFB08.jpg
Views: 2743
Size:  60.5 KB

    Enough said about the differences. The racket is the lightest Yonex racket. I have played with some lighter rackets. Brands like Karakal can deliver even lighter rackets, but they are also more flexible. And this is where Yonex has delivered a good job. Although it's light, it did not suffer in stiffness. It can be that the frame is so light, bending is minimal during impact. The power of a racket from this weight class is very impressive! It's still not a power racket, but the power is decent enough. I had no problem clearing with this racket. This racket is lightning fast in response. But it was expected from a light racket. Control at the net is very good, but you have to remember that you still have to 'hold on' to the racket. With heavier rackets, you can sometimes let the racket return net shots, but if you do this with the Flash Boost, it may bounce the racket back, resulting in less accuracy. The power of this racket is in defensive returns, net play and rushing in to the net. The power is not bad, but I could not create deadly smashes. Even worst, when you smash and it's not deadly, you're a sitting duck on the field, waiting for your opponent to smash.

    To me, the Flash Boost is an unique racket with lighting fast response and I did like the racket for defensive and against offensive players. The downside of this racket, is it's lightness. When I switched back to the 2U and 3U rackets, they felt slow and heavy. But these rackets were all more powerful. The first clears and lobs went all out on the back court. That makes the Flash Boost not a very good racket to mix with other (Yonex) rackets in your bag. For this reason, this racket will never be my main racket. But if you are used to very light rackets like Karakal, or I believe some Forza's are also very light, it can become one of your favorites.

    I would not use this racket as a singles racket at all. Depending on your playing style, this is a very good defensive double racket, best used from your wrist. If you like fast interceptions and counterattack style, or your opponent is so fast, you don't even have time to smash, just give the Arcsaber Flash Boost a try. To me, it's more a spare for special occasions.

  8. #297
    Moderator cobalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    8,905
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the review, @CarbonexFan

    I assume you used the 6u version of this racquet. Do you think the 5u would prompt you to use this racquet more?

  9. #298
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    201
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got one yesterday but dont get to play with it until Monday. It has a mean swing that doesn't tire you much at all.

  10. #299
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    anyone keen to put a couple of grams of lead tape to the top? that may push the BP to a crazier point.. 320mm?!

  11. #300
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cobalt View Post
    Thanks for the review, @CarbonexFan

    I assume you used the 6u version of this racquet. Do you think the 5u would prompt you to use this racquet more?
    I don't think so. Why weaken it's strongest point? I used it yesterday against some very fast and strong players. As I'm recovering from a small surgery, I was not fast enough. So I used the racket again and it worked great! Untill we did a partner change and my partner is more an allrounder. I just couldn't smash through him. So I changed back to my 3U rackets, but did not picked up the speed after that because the racket was heavy and slow. It was easy to adapt to a light racket, but it took too long to adapt to the 3U one. It's just a practical sample.

  12. #301
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    if i put a 4.2 gram tungsten tape on the head of the racquet, the BP becomes 321mm with overgrip on.. w/o overgrip it might be 330mm..

    should i try it? and risk the potential shaft damage? :X

  13. #302
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    971
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vajrasattva View Post
    if i put a 4.2 gram tungsten tape on the head of the racquet, the BP becomes 321mm with overgrip on.. w/o overgrip it might be 330mm..

    should i try it? and risk the potential shaft damage? :X
    The racket is solid enough imo.

  14. #303
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,252
    Mentioned
    139 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vajrasattva View Post
    if i put a 4.2 gram tungsten tape on the head of the racquet, the BP becomes 321mm with overgrip on.. w/o overgrip it might be 330mm..

    should i try it? and risk the potential shaft damage? :X
    Yes, but remove the tape if you need to make a warranty claim.

  15. #304
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @vajrasattva
    Well, remove the original grip and put only single layer of overgrip on top of wood,
    you already have the BP at 320mm...

  16. #305
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    971
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cschun86 View Post
    @vajrasattva
    Well, remove the original grip and put only single layer of overgrip on top of wood,
    you already have the BP at 320mm...
    Grips have (almost) absolutely no impact on the swing weight of the racket. So changing the grip just to change the BP will have no effect whatsoever.

    It's just a number change for the sake if changing something...

  17. #306
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,857
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Removing grip is not the same as putting weight on the head. Putting extra weight on the head increases the racket's momentum, removing grip doesn't. A thinner grip will make anything feel heavier, though.

Page 18 of 59 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •