User Tag List

Page 19 of 24 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 LastLast
Results 307 to 323 of 404

Thread: RKEP Rackets

  1. #307
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    is the xp70 a good 'upgrade ' from a mx60 if I think I want a stiffer shaft (ahem)?

    Off topic @visor but zm62 feeling a few pounds tighter than thicker strings: does the frame feel the actual or perceived tension? Ie could you put zm62@24lbs on a voltric limited to 24lbs? Or would this be like putting 26/27 on it?

  2. #308
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by forumer View Post
    How would u rate the shaft stiffness between the two?
    I have not used the TK6000 alot but during the short duration when I was using it, the shaft bends more than the XP70. This could be due to the TK6000 head heaviness rather than the shaft being stiffer.

  3. #309
    Regular Member j4ckie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,742
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DuckFeet View Post
    is the xp70 a good 'upgrade ' from a mx60 if I think I want a stiffer shaft (ahem)?

    Off topic @visor but zm62 feeling a few pounds tighter than thicker strings: does the frame feel the actual or perceived tension? Ie could you put zm62@24lbs on a voltric limited to 24lbs? Or would this be like putting 26/27 on it?
    The warranty is only applicable to the actual mechanic pull, so a 24lbs Zm62 is just as fine as a 24 Bg65. It will only feel a bit like a thicker string with higher tension as the thinner string allows for more feedback, but mechanically speaking, both stress the racket just the same. Grommets don't like thin strings like that but at 24 they'll be fine.
    Personally, I don't like the 62 anymore, it just doesn't feel solid on hard hits. The 65 is better, but not as lively as I remembered it to be. Still, at the current price one really can't complain!

  4. #310
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,366
    Mentioned
    102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, as j4ckie says, the frame only sees the actual pulled tension. But the grommets on the other hand pay the price of having the same tension on a smaller surface area, so they'll need to be rotated or changed more often in order to protect the frame.

  5. #311
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I'm going to try a xp70. I believe you can get 3 in one shipment so is anyone else in the UK thinking of placing an order for a racket in the near future? @dbswansea , you mentioned one but not for a while?

    I take it this frame is faster than meteor and stiffer than mx60. I think that's what I'm after.

  6. #312
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Any advice on whether I should buy one or two? I thought I'd go for different weights and pick the one I like better. Then sell the other one or let go the mx60 and keep both. I suppose the saving on postage isn't massive.

  7. #313
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sgp
    Posts
    565
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DuckFeet View Post
    Any advice on whether I should buy one or two? I thought I'd go for different weights and pick the one I like better. Then sell the other one or let go the mx60 and keep both. I suppose the saving on postage isn't massive.
    buying one or two rackets will cost you the same postage. in fact the postage is the same for up three rackets.

  8. #314
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    But if I end up buying 2 separately it will cost more. Not much though. I hope I can order the first one next week.

  9. #315
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DuckFeet View Post
    But if I end up buying 2 separately it will cost more. Not much though. I hope I can order the first one next week.
    Have you consider Victor TK6000, 3u if u can handle a heavier wt, it would benefit you.
    Stiffness wise TK6000 is comparable to the XP70 but slower. Power is definitely a strong asset of the TK6000 and is now my go to racket over the XP70.

  10. #316
    Regular Member TeddyC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    476
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    forumer:
    Am keen on the XP70 but recently I just got myself a TK-6ooo 4u. Would u care to elaborate more between these two excellent rackets, tks!

  11. #317
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TeddyC View Post
    forumer:
    Am keen on the XP70 but recently I just got myself a TK-6ooo 4u. Would u care to elaborate more between these two excellent rackets, tks!
    As you know, Victor has 3 series of racquets (Power, All round and Speed) and TK6000 belongs to the power series. The XP70 to me is a all round racquet which is similar to the Meteor series except that it is slightly faster.

  12. #318
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    514
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I own a XP70 before and now 4U TK6000... Both of these two played very differently. To me, XP70 plays very similar to BS12. It is fast but it feels kinda hollow and not meaty enough. I find it rather a bit difficult to hit clears to baseline. On the other hand, TK6000 is head heavy and powerful racket. It might be slower than XP70 but it is for different playing style. They both feels very much different.

  13. #319
    Regular Member TeddyC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    476
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Tks for the feedback, appreciate it!

  14. #320
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davlee View Post
    I own a XP70 before and now 4U TK6000... Both of these two played very differently. To me, XP70 plays very similar to BS12. It is fast but it feels kinda hollow and not meaty enough. I find it rather a bit difficult to hit clears to baseline. On the other hand, TK6000 is head heavy and powerful racket. It might be slower than XP70 but it is for different playing style. They both feels very much different.
    For me, I find my 3U XP70 (91g, BP301mm, wet wt) is better for playing quick drive excelling in the mid court to front play. It still can pack quite a punch if you have a fast swing and strong wrist but I too find it difficult to hit clear to baseline, maybe due to my poor technique. For a 3U, it felt lighter than it's intended spec, thus it swing faster with good control due to stiff shaft.

    As for my 3U TK6000 (94g, BP313mm, wet wt), I find it easier to hit clears to baseline without much struggle compared to XP70,which Mark also had stated in his review that this is the most efficient racket in term of effort ratio. And of course power smashes are easier to generate too.
    Strangely, I found that I had better control at net play with this racket, maybe due to its solid stable frame structure giving better feedback. Accuracy wise, it did not suffer as the shaft stiffness is similar to XP70, though it's stated as mid-flex.
    Downside would be it's slower speed in fast drive playing. But that does not bother me much as I find that I can play drop with a block due to racket better repulsion.
    Lastly, I must thank Paul and Mark for writing such good and truthful review of this racket. Please keep up the good as well the not so good reviews going on!

  15. #321
    Regular Member TeddyC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    476
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Great insight, tks!

    TK-6ooo is a wonderful racket! My 4u is great in fast, flat rallies. Reckon that's the trade off between 3u n 4u.

    Indeed, we r very grateful to Paul n Mark for their honest reviews. Keep them coming!

  16. #322
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    I how I've copied the right image (thanks @phaaam for posting it).

    Does this show a starting knot in the same hole as first cross? If so, how? It looks very neat.

    Also I like the addition of the extra top cross and lack of bottom cross. I will have to try this.

    Reason I am posting here and not in a stringing thread is because it's easier to quote, and I just ordered my XP70. 87-88g 297-300bp. Can't wait to try it. Yet again, will arrive just before a tournament

  17. #323
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    356
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DuckFeet View Post


    I how I've copied the right image (thanks @phaaam for posting it).

    Does this show a starting knot in the same hole as first cross? If so, how? It looks very neat.

    Also I like the addition of the extra top cross and lack of bottom cross. I will have to try this.

    Reason I am posting here and not in a stringing thread is because it's easier to quote, and I just ordered my XP70. 87-88g 297-300bp. Can't wait to try it. Yet again, will arrive just before a tournament
    Heh I can explain this since I did it.

    Just for reference I do a standard starting knot and Parnell knot for tie-offs: http://www.keohi.com/tennis/misc/knots.htm#Starting Knot
    Tip: for a larger grommet/hole that you're going to use for a starting knot, do three loops instead of two.

    To relate this post back to the XP70, I had an interesting experience stringing it for the first time back then. My tie-offs for mains were in the same hole as my first cross strings because it was the widest grommet. You can also see the missing cross that DuckFeet mentioned in this image. Name:  rkep2.jpg
Views: 321
Size:  70.6 KB

    Enjoy the XP70 and good luck with that tourney!
    Last edited by phaaam; 12-28-2013 at 05:53 AM.

Page 19 of 24 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •