User Tag List

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 92
  1. #1
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,915
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Adidas adizero pro Badminton Racket Review

    Last week I received a box of goodies from Adidas Badminton to review. Among them is a Adidas adizero pro racket.

    Adidas is a newcomer to the badminton equipment scene. 2+ years in the planning Adidas is finally ready to reveal their badminton lineup to the world. The Adidas adizero series of badminton racket is characterized by their fast swing speed, light 4U weight well suited for players who love a fast doubles games.

    There are 2 models in the adizero series that is designated as “advanced pro” models, basically these are the cream of the crop of the adizero series and have the most technology and advanced materials behind them.

    Design

    Name:  2M6Q0031.jpg
Views: 11537
Size:  29.9 KB

    The adizero pro is rated as a medium stiffness singles/doubles racket for fast attacking player. The spec weight is 80g +/- 2g with a balance point of 295mm +/- 3mm. The shaft tapers from 7.5mm near the cone to 6.5mm near the T-joint. While the balance is a highish 295mm, the light overall weight of the racket give it a very fast swingweight.

    Like the head heavy adipower series, Adidas incorporated some unique technology for the adizero pro’s racket head. A “Dual Force Frame” consist of both titanium mesh at the 4 corners and Zylon fibers to reinforce the frame structure. Zylon is a material made by Toyobo company in Japan and is supposed to be 1.6 times stronger than Kevlar. More Zylon is strategically placed around the frame as part of the adizero pro’s “Vibration Control System”.

    The adizero pro also utilizes Adidas’ unique 78 holes stringing pattern. The 78 holes pattern is similar to the popular 76 holes pattern plus an extra pair of shared holes in the 4/8 o’clock positions. This makes it much easier for the stringer, as well as letting the engineers align the outermost main string to be completely parallel with the rest of the mains, resulting in a tidy and uniformly laid out main strings across the frame.

    As with any modern rackets, single and double pass grommets are used in the appropriate locations to maximize frame strength.

    Aesthetic

    Name:  2M6Q0033.jpg
Views: 12236
Size:  24.6 KB

    The adizero pro has a black base color scheme with yellow dominating accents. The model name “adizero pro” is found at the bottom of the shaft near the cone, and the Adidas signature triband at the racket head which forms part of the asymmetric design of the head.

    The Adidas logo is only subtly found on the cone and the handle base.

    The overall design with bold accents and simple line is a nice departure from the complex design of Yonex/Victor.

    Stringing

    I strung the adizero pro with Ashaway Zymax 65 at a tension of 22x22lbs. I chose a lower tension to match the light weight racket design and the medium stiff racket shaft. And it turned out it was a good decision.

    You can see the process of stringing the adizero pro in this youtube video i made:



    Note the use of the yellow ZM65 which matches the yellow accent of the adizero pro perfectly.

    Performance

    Name:  2M6Q0023.jpg
Views: 9905
Size:  34.1 KB

    On dry swings, the adizero pro feels light as it is designed to be. To be very honest I am not a big fan of light weight rackets as it is very hard to execute a power smash with so little weight on the racket. The only way to have it working is to give it a head heavier balance and a not-so-stiff shaft which is exactly what Adidas has done. Soon I will find out if it works out as intended to.

    I started off doing some drivedefense drill against a very fast and trick player at the net. The adizero pro really surprised me, not only from its light and fast swing which is expected, but from the stability of the racket head which is something i don’t expect. Little deflection was felt on the racket head and the medium stiff shaft together means that the racket is fairly stable and easy to control. The quickness of the racket also means it is easy to contort the arm, wrist and fingers to returns drives aimed at the trickier contact points. Maneuverability is excellent.

    Moving onto the heavier shots, clears are not a problem at all. The medium stiff shaft is quite suitable for medium strength shots and while the head balance is slightly light, it doesn’t make it much harder to hit. It is not effortless, however, as one would need to give a little more emphasis on the wrist and fingers to send the shuttle over the other end of the court.

    For a 80 grams racket (my sample came in at 82g) the racket feel relative solid, not solid like the adipower pro but much more solid than other 82g rackets that i have tried. The overall racket feels lively when paired with medium feeling Ashaway ZM65@22lbs. I’d attribute that to the shaft design as well as quality raw material used.

    Most people won’t consider lightweight racket to be powerful. But this is where the adizero pro really surprised me. A couple of times when launching myself into a full on jumping smash, i was (pleasantly) surprised by the loud boom and velocity the racket managed to unleash. In fact, it got to the point that it was actually fun to hit smash with it.

    Despite head heavy balance this is afterall a light racket. While i find it very maneuverable at the net, esp for fast tricky shots like a cross court net, the stability cannot compared to heavier rackets. Having said that, I don’t have much problem executing netshots with it.

    I am still on the fence when it comes to defense with the adizero pro. I was able to do some super fast defensive drive and counterattack with the adizero pro, esp against the hardest smashing players who sometimes got left standing with the shuttle driven fast and deep into the opposite side of their court. However, I also find that it took extra effort to defend the shuttle deep and high into the backcourt, I have to consciously apply extra finger force to get the deep returns.

    The place where this racket shines the most is the mid court fast attacking drives, which is the bread and butter of this attacking light weight racket. It is so easy to counterattackfast incoming drives with a faster return. The response of the racket also seems to be tuned to this type of shots and speed. If this is your style, the adizero pro is the racket for you.

    No racket are perfect and neither is the adizero pro. While i don’t find the damping particularly much, but i do prefer less damped feel of the heavier brother adipower pro. The is a certain lack of crispness in comparison. I cannot exactly pinpoint the reason from my feel alone but i am guess either the shaft design or the lesser quantity of material used.

    Final Words

    To summarize, the adizero pro is a light swingweight racket that is excellent for players who prefers to play a fast attacking game esp in doubles. The head heavy balance combined with light weight and medium stiff shaft creates a synergetic combination which is both fast and powerful.

    I was pleasantly surprised by the racket despite my preference for heavier 3U rackets. It shows that a good design can overcome power issues associated with light weight racket.

    As the flagship of the Adidas fast and light adizero series, this complements the comprehensive lineup that Adidas is offering badminton players very well.

  2. #2
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,209
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    kwun, can you please do me/us a favour... (you know where this is headed )

    Can you please weigh the head as I do? I'm curious how much the head weighs... I'm guessing 33g or so.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    501
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    looks good! oh no!! why does non-yonex racquets start to look so alluring........


    oh no!!... my wallet is moving out of my pocket on its own......

  4. #4
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,915
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    kwun, can you please do me/us a favour... (you know where this is headed )

    Can you please weigh the head as I do? I'm curious how much the head weighs... I'm guessing 33g or so.
    i did it.

    but one caveat. it has zm65 strung on it.

    37.8 grams.

  5. #5
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,209
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    i did it.

    but one caveat. it has zm65 strung on it.

    37.8 grams.
    Tks!
    Zm65 would add 2.8g.
    Is there overgrip?

  6. #6
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,734
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    kwun, can you please do me/us a favour... (you know where this is headed )

    Can you please weigh the head as I do? I'm curious how much the head weighs... I'm guessing 33g or so.
    I wonder what range of head weights you have encountered so far? For lack of a more accurate scale everything I tested yesterday weighs in at either 38gr. unstrung or 42gr. strung, apart from a 95gr. Aerotus 80 weighing in at 39gr. Only one other hovering between 39 and 38 before settling on 38gr.
    Will re-do it again some time, was just testing if I got weights in your ranges . To be continued in the other thread of course ... Then again they were all heavy 3U's in at most a bp range of 10mm apart (Ti-10 II to AT700 I)
    Ah I see the 37.8 here was strung
    Last edited by demolidor; 02-21-2013 at 09:25 PM.

  7. #7
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,915
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    Tks!
    Zm65 would add 2.8g.
    Is there overgrip?
    no overgrip.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    KL, Malaysia
    Posts
    583
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How much does this cost and what is the availability right now?

  9. #9
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,734
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    140(-150) euro and no availability? The official launch hasn't even been held yet ...
    Last edited by demolidor; 02-21-2013 at 09:31 PM.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    KL, Malaysia
    Posts
    583
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demolidor View Post
    (130-)140 euro and no availability? The official launch hasn't even been held yet ...
    Wah .. about the same price as Yonex ZF before discount.
    It this the list price?

  11. #11
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,209
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    no overgrip.
    So that means bare head wt is 35.0g. Not bad.

    Wonder how it compares to Arc FB...

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    461
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dang. I like the design and colours of the racket, but I don't like to use 4U rackets....

  13. #13
    Regular Member Ashdelsol7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Wirral
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i like the design of this racket but the specs arent what i would be shopping for. I play with a 3ug4 and a 4ug5 nanoray 800 (uk & germany coded). So i was expecting the adizero pro to be a headlight stiff racket....unfortunately i will not buy a racket on looks alone so unless adidas have something else in the pipeline with the specs im after then i wont be purchasing. The racket bags on the other hand have most definitely caught my eye and aslong as the price is good then i will prob buy one of those

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kwun,

    In your opinion, which Yonex racket is most similar to the Adizero Pro? Just want to confirm that the Yonex weight equvalent for this racket is 4U? Any idea on US pricing?

    I'm a huge fan of the Yonex BG-80. Do you think that would be an appropriate string to use with this racket?

    Thank you.

  15. #15
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,734
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rogerv2 View Post
    Wah .. about the same price as Yonex ZF before discount.
    It this the list price?
    The price for ZF is < RM600 before discount??

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashdelsol7 View Post
    i like the design of this racket but the specs arent what i would be shopping for. I play with a 3ug4 and a 4ug5 nanoray 800 (uk & germany coded). So i was expecting the adizero pro to be a headlight stiff racket....unfortunately i will not buy a racket on looks alone so unless adidas have something else in the pipeline with the specs im after then i wont be purchasing. The racket bags on the other hand have most definitely caught my eye and aslong as the price is good then i will prob buy one of those
    Take a look at the adipower duoforce ...
    Last edited by demolidor; 02-22-2013 at 06:50 AM.

  16. #16
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,915
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt_Strider View Post
    Kwun,

    In your opinion, which Yonex racket is most similar to the Adizero Pro? Just want to confirm that the Yonex weight equvalent for this racket is 4U? Any idea on US pricing?

    I'm a huge fan of the Yonex BG-80. Do you think that would be an appropriate string to use with this racket?

    Thank you.
    i don't know which Yonex is equivalent. recently i haven't even been using Yonex at all. however, i do feel that this racket feel very similar to a 4U Victor MX JJS that i have tried. both are light, fast, powerful and feel is lively.

    as for string, the string i chose was ZM65, a relatively soft string and i had it at low 22lbs. i usually choose softer string and lower tension when match with light headed racket coz i find it harder to generate power with light weight and stiff strings. you maybe able to string it with BG80 but you just have to experiment.

  17. #17
    Regular Member gundamzaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Santa Clara County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,483
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    i don't know which Yonex is equivalent. recently i haven't even been using Yonex at all. however, i do feel that this racket feel very similar to a 4U Victor MX JJS that i have tried. both are light, fast, powerful and feel is lively.

    as for string, the string i chose was ZM65, a relatively soft string and i had it at low 22lbs. i usually choose softer string and lower tension when match with light headed racket coz i find it harder to generate power with light weight and stiff strings. you maybe able to string it with BG80 but you just have to experiment.
    that's a very good point on the string type/tension racket spec combo. took me a while to put two and two together

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •