Results 18 to 34 of 37
03-20-2013, 05:59 AM #18
ucantseeme liked this post
03-20-2013, 07:32 AM #19
Thanks to all for your replies. My question and problem is solved. Not necessary to answer my question in the future.
03-20-2013, 08:42 AM #20
Print this page out, make sure the web address is visible, show her and encourage her to join.
FWIW, IF she's not willing to change and evolve. Find a new partner.
03-20-2013, 05:23 PM #21
no way, she thinks that she do it the right way and I'm wrong because she is so experienced. And the sadest thing is that a few players at my club believe her rubbish and do it the same. Especially younger and beginner follow her, which is very sad. I will get around her.
03-20-2013, 08:01 PM #22
Hi, you have mis-interpreted my comment...what I am saying is I take a half-step forward and through my peripheral vision i try to track what shot my partner is taking....if my partner plays a drop I will rush to the net to pressure....THAT MEANS when the birdie is flying past me , across the net to opponent side...during this period, I must be taking another step to the net so that when the opponent "replies", I am already at the net pressurising......hope I make myself clear.
yes this is very demanding, but lots of ppl are not doing it. For the pros, it is different because nearly 100% of the times any high shots will be met with a smash or drop, but for us amateurs, sometimes we dun hv enough power/time to do it, hence I compensate by taking half-step.
Good luck and keep smashing !
03-20-2013, 08:31 PM #23
Maybe you could try cross court drop, smash and drives. Looks like she is on the beginner level of play.
03-21-2013, 06:48 AM #24
Dropping is a defensive shot? Since when?!
When you drop or smash or even an offensive clear, stay at the back and partner covers the front
Actually when you partner sees a high shot going to you, she should take a small half step and prepare to move forward incase. In my game, in most situations I will already move forward since my partners are normally offensive
03-21-2013, 08:36 AM #25
At the end of the day, you just improve your reaction, speed, technique and court awareness.
Last edited by heyhey; 03-21-2013 at 08:40 AM.
03-23-2013, 06:42 PM #26
This is an amusing thread Unfortunately I haven't been able to read all of it, so apologies if what I say is not relevant or already been said.
Can I just say, as a means of throwing spanners into the works and whatnot, that when the shuttle is lifted to me, my partner can actually choose what they are going to cover.
If my partner intends to cover everything straight, then they will move in front of me before I have hit the shuttle. Note: moving to the "T" is stupid - this is too far forwards. They should be at least a few feet behind the line (if not further back). They should be roughly on the same side as me, and should have one foot on the centre line (roughly speaking). If the opponent plays a cross block (to the net), my partner will have to cover that. If my opponent plays a cross drive, I will have to cover that, because my partner is covering straight, and can't possibly reach a good cross drive. If I can't get to that cross drive, it is my fault for playing a shot such that I can't cover the court afterwards.
If my partner intends to cover everything cross court, then they will stand in the mid court on the other side to me. This sounds like the situation the original poster was in (partner not standing at the front, and on the "wrong" side). In this situation, I will know, before I hit my shot, that ANY cross court shot is going to be covered by my partner. I know that this is a really good opportunity to be very aggressive, so I will smash hard and come forwards into the mid court (which sounds like the advice given to the original poster?). I will be looking for anything that comes into my half, but expecting driven or blocked defence which I want to attack. I know my partner will handle anything cross court, so it gives our opponents no chance to counter attack. The only option they have is lifted defence, which may be effective since I am coming forwards to attack. However, I am not too worried about this - I can cover my half easily enough, even if having to retrieve a lift after rushing forwards.
The moral of this story is that I am more than happy to cover everything straight myself, or rotate if thats what my partner wants (hit from the back and comes forwards - my partner will cover everything cross court and the straight lift where I was just hitting from). I am happy for my partner to choose what they will cover, and indicate this to me by where they stand. If I do a drop shot, they really should cover the net themselves (even if stood in the "wrong" place before hand) because there is plenty of time for them to get into a better position to threaten the net.
Note: always smashing or dropping is predictable, but it may also be effective! If your smashes and drops are not winning you points though, mix in some punch clears (especially in womens doubles) - sometimes you need to move your opponent as well as just attack them!
Good luck to you all! I look forward to anyone who has comments about what I have said.
Borbor liked this post
03-23-2013, 09:26 PM #27
You have some very good points, as usual.
I would also like to add a few things.
1. Level of play
Depending on the level of play (beginner/advanced, social, semi competitive, competitive without appearing to be competitive , and outright tournament competitive), the attacking position of the pair will vary greatly. And not everyone will know where to stand or go to at all times, given that the game is very fluid at all times and split second decisions and placement depend very much on experience. Heck, even pro players get caught out of position sometimes.
2. Partner chemistry
Sometimes, especially so in social pick-up badminton in group play, there is poor chemistry between the 2 players for various reasons. Could be incompatibility of styles, levels, personalities, etc. Could even be old grudges between the two from past pairings. I'm a pretty easy going guy, so I get along with anyone whether I win or lose, but I've seen my share of some pretty nasty arguments between partners while on court.
3. Most important is to keep things in perspective and if you're stuck with someone who's stubborn or doesn't understand shot placement and pair positioning, then just do your low risk shots and just concentrate on your own shots and the game will be over before you know it. Then next time you get on the courts, just make sure you're the 2nd or 3rd person (not 1st or 4th!) to get on so that you can choose who you partner (or do not partner) with.
03-24-2013, 10:24 AM #28
You are spot on obviously!
I am also a fairly easy going partner. I enjoy it when my partner plays their own style, and I will fit my game in around them. However, nothing beats playing with someone who is on the same wavelength as you!
Good luck to everyone!
03-25-2013, 08:13 AM #29
Must admit, I am somewhat skeptical about 'partner choosing to cover the x-court'. Whilst it may be possible to attack and cover the standard responses effectively, I don't see what you are gaining relative to the standard channel/straight attack.
By smashing straight & rushing forward, you and your partner are covering driven responses well. However, the (straight) net player should be able to cover driven responses off a well-placed (i.e. steep) smash anyway.
Whilst you may well be able to get to a straight block, I don't believe that you can take it as early as the net player would.
Similarly, your coverage of the back corner will be compromised to some extent by your coverage of the front corner. Therefore, any subsequent smashes will be harder than if you had a conventional attack.
Attacking x-court is already risky. Your opposition will intercept closer to the net and higher than off a straight attack. Even if your partner is in position, they may already be on the back foot in the subsequent driving rally.
Finally, whilst excellent stamina and footwork may make this possible, aren't you expending more energy attacking this way?
I accept that there may be specific circumstances/styles where this approach is better. However, I would be surprised if this works for more than a small minority of cases.
StefanDO liked this post
03-25-2013, 08:50 AM #30
Line and Length, excellent post! I would like to talk about your comments!
I hope this makes sense! I absolutely agree with everything you have said, but I still think that it is perfectly normal for a partner to choose to sometimes cover the cross court shots and leave the straight ones to me.
I don't know about you, but when I play matches, it frequently occurs that, after a few rallies of having their defenses destroyed by my partner and I using a channel attack, they start searching for ways of stopping us from using this focused attack. One of their options is a cross court block, drive or lift. When they do this on a regular basis, my partner and I will adjust our tactics accordingly to try and prevent our opponents from escaping! Sometimes standing straight, sometimes cross. We find it really effective, confusing opponents, and allows us to be a bit more flexible in our attack.
Look forward to your thoughts!
03-25-2013, 10:36 AM #31
It makes sense you're taking an anticipatory tactical decision here. There might be other cases (e.g. in XD) when you partner (a girl/woman) may take up a cross-court position from her partner in order to apply pressure to the girl/woman on the other team.
However, I believe this thinking, or discussion, was absent in OP's case. It sounded like OP's partner habitually does her things without any regard of what tactical situation might be. And that lies the objection(s).
amleto liked this post
03-25-2013, 11:26 AM #32
when i was training for doubles, from the defensive side by side position, as soon as your partner sees that your opponent is lifting to your side, she should have rushed to cover your net area, if you continue to smash or drop, she should stay in front of you to cover the net. but if you clear back to your opponent, then your partner should return to her original side side position. at least that's the basic rotation that i was taught. however if you get tired and want to rotate yourself out of the rear court, then that's a different story.
03-25-2013, 03:55 PM #33
It's a pity that this girl isn't open to logical arguments AND that she's spreading the wrong tactics. As far as her view of drop shots as defensive shots is concerned: Tell her that any shot that forces opponents to lift is an offensive shot (so this includes good smashes AND good drops).
With respect to some posts above, interestingly, both views cover opposing extremes:
1) The shuttle gets lifted or cleared to you, and your partner covers the net area by standing somewhat close but behind the T.
2) The shuttle gets lifted or cleared to you, and your partner covers the half of the court sideways from you (more or less as in defense).
The ideal - as far as I understand it from one of LJB's double tactics videos - is between both extremes: The partner should definitely cover the net area. BUT: He/she should not necessarily stand exactly in the middle of the court. Basic attacking formation suggests that he/she should stand slightly more to the side of the attacking partner (expecting the attacking partner to hit a straight smash or drop, as crosscourt shots should be avoided in doubles, except if opponents are out of position... the straight smash or drop should usually lead to straight weak replies from the opponent, allowing a net kill), at least if the attack is not too weak. Advanced attacking formation suggests that he/she should stand slightly more to the other side of the court (accounting for skillful defense from the opponents, i.e. cross net shots or drives to the other corner, which gives your partner better chances to keep the attack - because if you smash and have to run to the other corner of the court to return a cross drive, usually you get there so late that your return is most likely a defensive shot). IMPORTANTLY, the partner still has to cover opponent's straight block, which is of course more difficult then. Therefore, this is regarded as an advanced attacking formation, and it needs both players to be aware of that.
03-25-2013, 05:32 PM #34
If she is "more experienced" then she should be able to explain the logic behind her tactics and also be able to evaluate alternaltives when challenged.
Do you not have access to a qualified coach who can explain from a position of authority?
There's plenty of us here on this board but we're anonymous over the internet so given her attitude i doubt she'd accept the consensous.
Which brings me back to my second point in my original post. Find another partner.