User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 18
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    211
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Bending stiffness and the playability of badminton frames

    Hi guys,

    Because our new tool can also measure the stiffness of the racquet we were talking about the importance of the stiffness of badminton racquets for their playability.

    Name:  RA-1-kl.jpg
Views: 742
Size:  38.6 KBName:  RA-2-kl.jpg
Views: 707
Size:  55.6 KB

    For tennis the stiffness of the frame is very decisive for the playability of it.
    A stiffer racquet offers more power, because less energy is lost in bending it.
    A more flexible racquet offers a longer dwell time, the contact between the ball and the strings is longer so the player feels more control on his strokes.
    The stiffness of tennis racquets can be measured with a Babolat RDC and is shown in the RA value.

    We are quite convinced that the stiffness of a badminton is very decisive for its playability but this can be quite different from tennisracquets.

    We would like to know more:
    - If the stiffness is quite low in relation to the stiffness of the stringbed, this could offer a springy effect that offers more power. Is this so?
    - Or does a stiffer racquet offer more power for the same reason as for a tennisracquet.
    - Does any supplier of badminton racquets mention values for the stiffness of the frames that he supplies?

    Would like to hear your thoughts.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    951
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Stiffness is quite important for badminton as well and every retailer and manufacturer mention the stiffness values of their racket.

    However, the relation between power and stiffness is not as simple as the relation you mentionned for tennis.

    In badminton, a player with less technique and/or power will find more power into flexible rackets because of the "springy" effet, or a whip like effect. Better players will find more power into stiffer rackets because of the better energy transfer into the shuttle. It is also the same for the stringbed stiffness. A player that uses a racket that is too stiff can somewhat compensate with less tension on their stringbed.

    The stiffness' effects on control are a bit different and many people say different things about it. In general though, stiff rackets (or strings) are considered to offer better control.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    211
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    HI Yan.V

    This is very useful information.
    I saw that the stiffness of the racquets is shown in stiff, medium ..etc


    Do you know if any absolute values are known?

    Our tool measures in kg per cm kg/cm, which means that if the stiffness is 20 you need 20 kg to bend the racquet down 1 cm.
    HI

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    951
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't know of any absolute values widely used by manufacturers.

    I do know that some companies like Black Knight use a rating value to indicate stiffness, but I don't know what they represent.

    Their ratings seem to be like this:

    < 82: Flexible
    82-85: Medium
    85-89: Stiff

    http://blackknight.ca/bk2013/

    I've seen other companies use different values, but I don't remember which ones on top of my head. Most companies just use: Very Flexible, Flexible, Medium, Stiff, Very Stiff or some variants of it.

  5. #5
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,128
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some companies like SOTX use rating to 10, with a 20kg wt at mid shaft causing a deflection of the shaft.
    The deflection in mm being 7-10mm.

    7 being very stiff
    10 being veryflexible.

  6. #6
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    36,130
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    The part that is not clear to me about the sotx rating is where they support the shaft. Obviously the distance between the support points are critical to the measurement.

  7. #7
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,128
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://www.ibuysports.com/badmintoninfosheet.html

    I'm not about to try
    on my rackets but here it states at the T joint. Measuring degree of deflection.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    http://www.ibuysports.com/badmintoninfosheet.html

    I'm not about to try
    on my rackets but here it states at the T joint. Measuring degree of deflection.
    is there a difference between stiffness and resilience? i.e. how fast it springs back to shape upon deformation?

  9. #9
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    36,130
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    http://www.ibuysports.com/badmintoninfosheet.html

    I'm not about to try
    on my rackets but here it states at the T joint. Measuring degree of deflection.
    it doesn't say where the support points are either. that's the crucial part. putting 20kg on the t-joint make no sense when it comes to measuring shaft stiffness. the only thing that make sense would be supporting at the handle, but 20kg on the handle, we are talking about 10cm+ of deflection.

    i bet whoever wrote that page was just told by some SOTX engineer/marketing, and never ever seen it done before.

  10. #10
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,128
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://www.directsportseshop.co.uk/P...o#.UU_U3SYTHFo

    Direct Sport UK also has a stiffness description in the spec tab for each racket, in mm, eg. 53mm for VZTF. I wonder how they measure it.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    211
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is obvious that the position of the supports is very important. And if you want to measure that stiffness tells something about the playability you need one support at the position of the handle.
    We have positioned the support at the same position of the Babolat RDC, did anybody put a badminton racquet on that system.

    We know the relation between RA value and kg/cm.

    Of course we can do tests with badminton racquets with our tool as soon as it is ready.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i've found that different racquets flex differently as well,

    i.e. on the i-slash or the gosen issen, it tends to flex more at the cone area of the handle, the gosen shiden, it flexes more towards the T joint.

    would have made more sense for measurements if shafts etc are proper full cylindrical rods, but in many cases they are tapered either upwards or downwards, so taking it at a single spot, does not necessarily represent the full playing feel

  13. #13
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    36,130
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    the idea for the measurement is very simple. anyone can DIY a machine like this in an afternoon.

  14. #14
    Regular Member clawhammers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    717
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    subscribing this thread

    found some useful blog from japan concerning analysis on Bending Point

    http://ameblo.jp/doppyo/entry-11485600695.html
    http://ameblo.jp/doppyo/entry-11485729400.html
    http://ameblo.jp/doppyo/entry-11488547039.html
    http://ameblo.jp/doppyo/entry-11488549915.html
    http://ameblo.jp/doppyo/entry-11499051192.html

    hope this help.

    Though the language in Japan, I use g-translate to learn the contents.

  15. #15
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,830
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the bump, now I can dump this pic here (since there are several thread about this in some shape or form)

    Last edited by demolidor; 07-13-2013 at 04:55 PM.

  16. #16
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,128
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ Interesting... what does that 230mm distance signify?

  17. #17
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,830
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The position on the shaft where the pressure is applied. From the bottom end of the shaft I (I presume), not the end of the handle (they don't even have a handle on them yet ). BUT, putting a tape measure across, it looks more like it is from the end of the theoretical handle.
    Last edited by demolidor; 07-13-2013 at 06:31 PM.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •