User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 19
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default What's wrong with this????

    Long story short, friend of mine has his T1 string up from someone as I was out of town and he needed the racquet to play. But he keep saying that the fresh string job on his T1 feels like crap and last night he handed that to me and ask me to re-string for him. I didn't pay much attention to it until I got home and pull it out the bag ..........

    http://

    And I am like WTF ...................

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Toronto & Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    715
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Is that 6 knots i see???

  3. #3
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,623
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Should be very stable stringbed... 1string for crosses and 1string for each side of mains.

  4. #4
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,961
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    i'd be interested to see how the pattern is done. ie. which string segment for each of the 3 strings. whether it was intentional or done due to a patch job.

    there is nothing inherent wrong or wrong in a general sense with 6 knots, just like there isn't anything wrong with 2 or 4 knots either. it all depends on how the string segments are laid out and more importantly the tensioning pattern which cannot be deciphered on a finished racket.

  5. #5
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,961
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    from the knots location, i am suspecting the stringer was doing a 4 knot, top down, and then either forgotten or ran out of string for the bottom cross. and then he decided to weave a single string for that cross string so it won't look too empty at the bottom.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    from the knots location, i am suspecting the stringer was doing a 4 knot, top down, and then either forgotten or ran out of string for the bottom cross. and then he decided to weave a single string for that cross string so it won't look too empty at the bottom.
    That's exactly what I suspected, I will clamp it down on the turn table tonight, do the CIS work and report back . In fact I think the string job is done by a rather experience stringer as that is nothing wrong with the pattern and the knots are done very nicely.

    Cheers

    Ted

  7. #7
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,623
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^^ In that case, your friend can't blame the stringjob for his poor play.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    As others have mentioned it's either a patch work or ran out of string . . . Will be interesting to see the results after you dissect it

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Dallas,TX. (From India)
    Posts
    986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thats the first time I have seen something like this.. Like Kwun mentioned, I dont think there is anything wrong with it but obviously the stringer messed up by either taking less string or the string broke in between! Either way, very interesting!

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    ^^ In that case, your friend can't blame the stringjob for his poor play.
    Lol ...... btw, where were you last night

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ok, after some tracing work, this is what I find:

    - cross starts at A8 rather than the usual A7
    - one side of the main was too short so it stops at B9 and tied off at B8
    - a patch string tied off at B9 to finished up the missing last 2 main then tied off at B7

    Tension is likely not very even but the last 2 main shouldn't affect the playability that much??

  12. #12
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,961
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    you mean the last 2 cross?

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    you mean the last 2 cross?
    No, it is one side of the main is too short.

  14. #14
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,961
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tedski View Post
    No, it is one side of the main is too short.


    speechless.

  15. #15
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,384
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tedski View Post
    Ok, after some tracing work, this is what I find:

    - cross starts at A8 rather than the usual A7
    - one side of the main was too short so it stops at B9 and tied off at B8
    - a patch string tied off at B9 to finished up the missing last 2 main then tied off at B7

    Tension is likely not very even but the last 2 main shouldn't affect the playability that much??
    *facepalm.

  16. #16
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,961
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    so then the most likely conclusion is that it is not an accident. as for the mains one would have started evenly in the middle. but having to be 2 segments short means that he knowingly started unevening due to the shortened string.

    but also at the same time, not smart enough to realize that a main string that is 2 segment short is probably long enough to do the crosses.

  17. #17
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,961
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    or maybe some accident happened and he cut the wrong string.

    but in whatever case, it is a sloppy job. once a stringer realize this he should've started over. esp when it only involve the mains, it should be at most 8-10mins extra.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •