User Tag List

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 52 to 54 of 54
  1. #52
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    U.S
    Posts
    11
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    please read my post above again:

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...52#post2148452

    2lbs or even up to 10% isn't a lot of difference. if it means the racket plays better it is more important than anything else.
    So, for the frame, is it about looks? Frame looking more natural, etc?

  2. #53
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,346
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erstr View Post
    So, for the frame, is it about looks? Frame looking more natural, etc?
    read my post again. no one mentioned looks. it is about playability.

  3. #54
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    birmingham
    Posts
    13
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As far as "looks" are concerned; when I first got into stringing I noticed the racquet I strung (24/24) looked fat and short compared to when it was unstrung so I just carried on playing with it. The next time I strung it I did 23/25 and it looked more natural or isometric so I never turned back. Nobody told me to string crosses higher I just went by instinct because it "looked" right. As far as playability is concerned I couldnt feel a difference tbh.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •