View Poll Results: Was BWF right to give Lin Dan a wildcard?
- 128. You may not vote on this poll
Yes - for the good of the game
No - he hasn't played for 8 months
Don't know - I can't decide - it's complicated :-(
07-17-2013, 03:05 PM #35
However hard I try I can't see the connection between Lin Dan and Ivanisevic either yet it is your #1 argument . At least he tried and showed up at tournaments ...
... comparing World Championships to regular open tournaments ... -smh-
... comparing reserves to wild cards ... -smh-
Ans yes 70% is thinking with 2 inch wood. If you are so hot for the possibility of LCW vs LD, pass the hat around and put up a million USD for a best of three mano-a-mano .
Maybe next year Jan Jorgensen will take a sabatical after picking up that $90,000 he wants at the IPL, joined by BoMo and Fischer Price because after all the WC 2014 is in Denmark and it would be a commercial failure if they didn't qualify .
That said, I am not completely opposed to the home organizer having a wildcard for the WC. It just so happens this isn't the case right now according to the current regulations. BWF stepped up instead and performed a 180 on their earlier comments.
I also don't blame Lin Dan for taking a break. It makes complete sense after an Olympic cycle and there should be more room for everyone to take a decent break which their hardly is with this calendar. Of course arguably 3 months after the OG is more than enough for anyone ...
And he is in a difficult position with the WC held in China and him being the face of Chinese badminton to refuse the wildcard (or perhaps they mistakenly thought they were entitled to one from the beginning).
But it's all behind us now anyway so ... whatever . I am not even going to watch it ...
Last edited by demolidor; 07-17-2013 at 03:17 PM.
07-21-2013, 08:35 PM #36
07-23-2013, 02:25 AM #37
what if lindan concede a walkover for chenlong? it might happen.
07-25-2013, 04:13 AM #38
Badminton: Lin Dan, Chong Wei on world championships collision course
Published on Jul 22, 2013
HONG KONG (AFP) - Badminton superstars Lin Dan and Lee Chong Wei are on course for their latest major title showdown after being placed in opposite sides of the world championships draw on Monday.
Lee, the world number one from Malaysia, had feared a meeting with his Chinese nemesis in the early rounds after the reigning world and Olympic champion entered the tournament on a wildcard.
However at a draw in Guangzhou, Lin and Lee landed in different halves of the field, meaning they cannot meet before the August 11 final in the southern Chinese city.
"Super Dan" has beaten Lee in the last two Olympic finals and in the title match at the last world championships in 2011, when the Chinese ace lifted the trophy for a fourth time.
07-25-2013, 12:46 PM #39
Blame it to the draw!
Blame it to the draw... it should have put LD vs LCW in the 1st/2nd/3rd round for the sake of every one thus removing all the doubts and other insidious forethoughts
It will be interesting to see if a poll is raised here querying "is it better to have LD vs LCW in the 1st/2nd/3rd round i/o the current draw?"
Last edited by kelana; 07-25-2013 at 12:48 PM.
07-25-2013, 09:14 PM #40
Followed by long and boring verbosity posts by LD fans?
Let them compete first, then talk.
07-26-2013, 11:09 PM #41
Followed by long and boring verbosity posts by LD fans?
Let them compete first, then talk.[/QUOTE]
In fact it's my first wish to have LD vs LCW compete first, then talk... incl. all the insidious forethoughts
07-26-2013, 11:46 PM #42
BWF allows the abuse of wildcard just for the sake of commercials. End of story.
It's too obvious and you guys arguing upon LD's qualification which I have no doubt he can defend his title once again. It has nothing to do with qualification, attitude or skipping tourneys.
It is BWF's main agenda to make sure badminton is not underrated sports anymore than it is. Therefore, do the math......No LD No Viewers.
Because of this purpose, I voted no. Just my 2 cents .
07-27-2013, 01:49 AM #43
Until now, i had agreed with BWF granting wild card to LD. It was a commercial decision, since LD vs LCW (in the final) is what everyone wanted to see.
But my view is now changed. I think BWF's decision was short sighted. You can't rely on LD vs LCW forever. Younger players need opportunities.
Just look at WS. With ZN and XXF retired, new and young players have emerged (from within or outside China). It was good for the WS discipline.
If LD and LCW continue to dominate (for the next one year or two), it would not be good for the sport in the long run.
08-02-2013, 12:02 PM #44
Out of the 64 MS entries, how many of them people will pay to watch? I bet no more than 10. Even thought LD is not ready, this is just an easy decision for the organizer to get wild card to LD.
08-02-2013, 12:25 PM #45
08-02-2013, 01:11 PM #46
If LD and LCW retire now (or sometime within this year), I am sure someone will come from behind and become the archrival of Chen Long.
Last edited by pcll99; 08-02-2013 at 01:19 PM.
08-03-2013, 09:34 AM #47
Cmon guys the organizer needs stream of money that LD provided.. Commercial, tv, ticket sales, etc.. My point is, if you guys are the organizers you would've done the same stuff..
08-03-2013, 09:57 AM #48
Last edited by craigandy; 08-03-2013 at 10:01 AM.
08-05-2013, 01:27 PM #49
Was BWF right to give Lin Dan a wildcard?
They have the right to. For whatever reason.
Justin L liked this post
08-05-2013, 03:31 PM #50
I don't agree with your argument. What you are arguing is a condemnation on the game of badminton. The idea that it is so weak that its appeal rests on the shoulders of a single player is I hope, untrue.
Last edited by thunder.tw; 08-05-2013 at 03:43 PM.
08-05-2013, 03:50 PM #51