User Tag List

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 35 to 51 of 134
  1. #35
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,092
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by craigandy View Post
    Still don't trust this one because of the other readings I can see but since your so adamant

    Vx racket = 1.22m/s
    Vx shuttle = 1.83m/s
    Ratio = 1.5
    lol, definitely something is wrong

  2. #36
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,094
    Mentioned
    135 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lol... yeah, but at least we got a good output to input ratio.

    Does the software need an input for frame rate? Because that FHF super slow mo section is very very high frame rate per sec. Meaning that one frame is probably like 1/1000th of a sec.

  3. #37
    Regular Member craigandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,856
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lol, Yeah it is clearly not FHF real time.
    Tried to do quite a few things with regard to frame rates but to no avail. If the video is already in slo mo you can't input the frame rate of the vid into the software for translation, not that i would know what the fhf frame rate is(or maybe you can I don't know the software inside out and there is developer templates). But you can imagine whatever speed he usually hits the shuttle and divide it by 1.5 to get the real time racket speed.

  4. #38
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amleto View Post
    That is a bad idea because the further the shuttle travels the more air resistance affects the results.
    air resistance is always affecting your results no matter what, whether you measure it when the shuttle has travelled more, or just left the bed of the racquet where it has barely travelled

    have you incorporated air resistance in your calculations then? if you have been ignoring it, then why not ignore it further?

    and it also depends on how hard the shuttle is being spun, if there is any slice component incorporated in the smash, the spin contributes.

  5. #39
    Regular Member craigandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,856
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vajrasattva View Post
    air resistance is always affecting your results no matter what, whether you measure it when the shuttle has travelled more, or just left the bed of the racquet where it has barely travelled

    have you incorporated air resistance in your calculations then? if you have been ignoring it, then why not ignore it further?

    and it also depends on how hard the shuttle is being spun, if there is any slice component incorporated in the smash, the spin contributes.

    The percentage of speed that air resistance subtracts over the first three feet is worth ignoring. It's a very small percent.

  6. #40
    Regular Member craigandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,856
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amleto View Post
    thanks for the info!

    Unless you have access to a swing weight app, then just the racket weight and bp will be useful.

    Is the software open source?
    Just thinking about this point some more. This way of measuring is never going to be accurate enough to start being able to take into account bp racket weight etc etc. Their is nothing to show how much slice is on the shuttle, also we don't know the reduction off center hits make to speed even off by a few mm could be a lot. The video's can show us some things but no point in including racket details etc as the information is not good enough.

    I think if you want to compare what racket weight is best, you would be best forgetting about using a shuttle, and just record swings speed of only you(personally) seeing how fast you can swing the different weighted rackets, then use line and lengths formula!

  7. #41
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,094
    Mentioned
    135 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by craigandy View Post
    Just thinking about this point some more. This way of measuring is never going to be accurate enough to start being able to take into account bp racket weight etc etc. Their is nothing to show how much slice is on the shuttle, also we don't know the reduction off center hits make to speed even off by a few mm could be a lot. The video's can show us some things but no point in including racket details etc as the information is not good enough.

    I think if you want to compare what racket weight is best, you would be best forgetting about using a shuttle, and just record swings speed of only you(personally) seeing how fast you can swing the different weighted rackets, then use line and lengths formula!
    I suppose... but still a greater m will have more P and KE, although it's a matter of optimizing the m so that you can still swing it at a very high v. Obviously due to differences in our musculature and technique, our individual optimal m and v will vary.

  8. #42
    Regular Member craigandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,856
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    I suppose... but still a greater m will have more P and KE, although it's a matter of optimizing the m so that you can still swing it at a very high v. Obviously due to differences in our musculature and technique, our individual optimal m and v will vary.
    lol sorry that was what i was trying to say in that last paragraph. measure your own personal swing speed for each of the rackets the use the appropriate v and m to see what gives you the higher Vs using LL's formula. Any better?

  9. #43
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,094
    Mentioned
    135 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    But still, let's say I swing fastest with the Arc FB, that doesn't mean that I'll get the fastest smash with it as it has a really low m. Otherwise you'll see everyone using very light rackets.

    Somehow m also plays a large role eg for LCW, LD.

  10. #44
    Regular Member craigandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,856
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    But still, let's say I swing fastest with the Arc FB, that doesn't mean that I'll get the fastest smash with it as it has a really low m. Otherwise you'll see everyone using very light rackets.

    Somehow m also plays a large role eg for LCW, LD.
    correct just because you swing fastest doesn't mean fastest smash but that's why you need to use line & length's formula as stated.

    So for instance lets say you have a racket with a 35g head mass and can swing(record it) at 150mph (67.05m/s) and then you get a flashboost with head weight 28g and you can swing that 170mph(75.99m/s)(record this).

    Then use vs/vr=(c+1)*mr/(mr+ms) to see what has worked out best for you. (I think c is more 0.7 and a 5g shuttle)

    first racket: the 35gram one
    Vs/67.05= (0.7+1)*0.035/(0.035 + 0.005)
    vs=99.74m/s (223.11mph)

    Flashboost one: the 28 gram one
    vs/75.99 = (0.7+1)*0.028/(0.028+0.005)
    vs = 109.6m/s (245.16mph)

    So if you can swing that 28g that faster than the 35g one then hey presto!

  11. #45
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,092
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by craigandy View Post
    I think if you want to compare what racket weight is best, you would be best forgetting about using a shuttle, and just record swings speed of only you(personally) seeing how fast you can swing the different weighted rackets, then use line and lengths formula!
    No, use the shuttle, and then measure shuttle speed is obviously the most logical thing

  12. #46
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    UK / Belgium
    Posts
    552
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's too simplistic a model anyway. Just because you can swing it with a lot of momentum, doesn't mean you'll be good at transferring it to a shuttle.

  13. #47
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,092
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this
    http://link.springer.com/content/pdf...3-0.pdf#page-1

    says that racket speed of 40m/s *at the tip* is elite badminton player level, so 67m/s - 75m/s is totally unrealistic.

  14. #48
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Worcestershire
    Posts
    207
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Whilst the vast majority of us (myself included) will only ever achieve a string-bed-speed of 20-30m/s, a speed in the region of 67-75m/s was probably needed to set the 421kph record.

    Re: wind resistance. I was trying to find a formula to solve: a = -k.v*v, v(0) = V. Maclaurin series diverges too quickly to be useful. Anyone know a good method? If there is one, craigandy could plot several frames after impact and work back to what the contact speed would have been. That said, taking the average speed over the first 2-3 frames after contact will be within a few percent.

    Re: momentum transfer to the shuttle. Whilst no contact is instantaneous, this one is short enough for additional force at the handle to make no significant influence what-so-ever. Just watch super slo-mos of balls striking cricket bats or snooker cues. The supposedly rigid timber wobbles like a tuning fork! To get the best shuttle speed for the weight you have, the velocity of the racket head needs to be as square to the shot as possible (no slicing) and as quick as possible at the point of impact.

  15. #49
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    homeland
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    about drag:

    general approach with short/long time approximation equation:
    http://users.df.uba.ar/sgil/physics_...echan/air0.pdf

    matlab: in 2d for golfball with drag
    http://www.engr.wisc.edu/cmsdocument...ODE-MATLAB.pdf

  16. #50
    Regular Member craigandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,856
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amleto View Post
    No, use the shuttle, and then measure shuttle speed is obviously the most logical thing
    No, you can too easily get a bad reading because who knows where on the racket string bed the shuttle came off or if their was slight slice during the test. Maybe a few mm off center makes no difference to feel or sound but big enough difference to speed. I just don't know.

  17. #51
    Regular Member craigandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,856
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SolsticeOfLight View Post
    It's too simplistic a model anyway. Just because you can swing it with a lot of momentum, doesn't mean you'll be good at transferring it to a shuttle.
    I think the model formula that line and length came up with is maybe not incredibly accurate for the actual speed of the shuttle but I see no reason why it is not an excellent formula for comparing rackets.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •