User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 29
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Ashaway Zymax 67 Titanium

    Hi guys,

    I've just received a sample of what I've been told is the new Zymax 67 Titanium.
    Upon arrival, the package is labelled Ashaway Titanium T-I and is at 0.69mm.

    String feels very slippery and slick with the usual Ti-feeling of titanium coated strings.

    Cant wait to string it up and find out.

    Anyone have any information regarding this string?

    Name:  2013-06-20 11.57.45.jpg
Views: 838
Size:  68.8 KBName:  2013-06-20 11.57.22.jpg
Views: 813
Size:  64.9 KB

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    WOW is the word for it. Had it strung and been playing with it. Might be onto another winner here Ashaway!!!

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    843
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    WOOOOOW comes out right when I ordered zymax 67 .-. And I have I wait even more due too a flood

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Danmark
    Posts
    211
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Where did you get it from?

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it is not on general sale yet as I've yet to see it on any website selling it yet. Probably they will repack it as it doesn't say Zymax 67 Titanium on its packages as what I've received.

    Its a sample sent by the distributor asking for reviews.

    I'm in the midst of writing up the review for them, I will post it here after I've sent them a copy, its only fair to them that way.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe they're doing that as to see if the reviews are favourable enough to try and introduce it into the market.

    But at the moment from what I've felt, they are definitely onto a winner here.

    More to come.

  7. #7
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,568
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Good job on the packaging then . It looks positively ancient!

    Name:  Ashaway Rally 21 Ti Badminton String - 10m set_main_2000x2000.jpg
Views: 639
Size:  35.2 KB

  8. Likes gundamzaku liked this post
  9. #8
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,568
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Looks like they are going to produce it: https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=Ashaway1824
    UK folks can still ask for test samples
    Last edited by demolidor; 08-01-2013 at 12:54 PM.

  10. #9
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    8,592
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    So, why is it a wow and a winner?

  11. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    821
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wonder how different a Ti-62 would play if it were ever manufactured!

  12. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ashaway Zymax 67 Titanium / Titanium T-I Review Feedback

    With thanks to Goode Sport.

    Initial Stringing Impressions:
    Strung on a Yonex Arcsaber 10 Premium (25lbs Mains x 27lbs Crosses) 2-piece bottom-top method with an Electronic Constant Pull (ECP) Machine with 10% Prestretch.

    Initial feel:
     String is quite smooth but with a slick / oily feel as with all titanium string models.
     Not very soft but does not feel very stiff as well. (6/10, 1 = very soft strings (nylon fibers); 10 = very stiff strings)
     String is quite stretchy when lightly pulled by hand.


    Under Stringing:
     String doesn’t stretch excessively under tensioning process unlike some strings in the market.
     Surprisingly doesn’t generate too much twisting (easily manageable) which is quite common with slick / oily coating string.
     String also doesn’t cause too much fuss or problems under the weaving process like some very rough strings or slick strings.
     String does have a slightly higher pitch upon lightly tapping with palm after completion of stringing.

    Hitting time:
     Medium-hard (crisp & solid) feeling with lots of explosiveness power. (7.5/10 scale, 1 = soft feeling ; 10 = hard feeling)
     Crisp initial impact with plenty of drive onto the shuttle.
     Very pleasant slightly high pitched hitting sound.
     Not very forgiving with miss-hits, not a lot of response hitting away from sweet spot as well as plenty of vibration.
     Very good touch feeling, effortless net and forecourt shots.
     Surprisingly very effective with slices even though the strings are quite smooth. (It doesn’t have absolutely bite on the shuttle as some other strings do but it is effective enough in bringing the shuttle down).
     Very happy with the tension retaining properties of the string. A slight noticeable drop in tension after the first session but stabilizes slowly after. (Observed over a period of 96 hours) (8.5/10, 1 = very bad tension retention; 10 = very good tension retention).


    Summary: A simple list of key points is presented with scores ranging from 1-10 with 10 being highest/best score and 1 being the lowest. (These are all based on personal experience and opinions)

    Repulsion Power: 9
    Control: 8
    Durability: 8+ (So far so good)
    Hitting Sound: 9
    Shock Absorption: 7.5
    Tension Retention: 8.5
    String Feel: 9
    Overall Score: 8.43

    Overall, it is a very good feeling string which packs a lot of punch. Not sacrificing control as well having a sharp crisp hitting sound. It also seems to be holding up quite well in the durability department. I’ve been impressed with its attributes so far and could be thinking that Ashaway is onto another winner here.

    Once again, I would like to thank Goode Sport for the sample. It’s been much appreciated.

  13. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sorry for not posting this earlier, I forgot after sending it in to Goode Sport.
    The above feedback is what I sent in on the 25th of June 2013.

    Please feel free to comment .

  14. #13
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    8,592
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting. Any comparison to any current ZM sttrings, like 62, 65, 67? So that we know better what your rating means.

  15. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ratings wise, it was done based on what I felt with the strings.
    I have tested a good amount of different strings of differing brands over the years and have been noting down what I felt with them and using them as a benchmark in writing my feedback.

    I've also previously extensively used the ZM62 and ZM65. The 67 and 70 werent my favourite thus not as much.

    But I can say this ZM67-Ti is up there as one of the better strings coming from manufacturers.

  16. Likes visor liked this post
  17. #15
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    8,592
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Cool!
    So that we know where this Ti string stands, can you also rate the 62 using the same system? Since many of us already have experience with 62.

  18. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I will do my best!!!

  19. Likes visor liked this post
  20. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    165
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Repulsion Power: ZM62 > ZM65 = ZM67Ti (I personally feel that the 67Ti provides an easier power generation compared to the 65, it is probably down to the feel coming off the strings.)

    Control: ZM65 > ZM62 > 67Ti


    Durability: ZM67Ti > ZM65 > ZM62


    Hitting Sound: ZM62 > ZM65 > ZM67Ti (The 67Ti just losing out by just a bit since it is a 0.69mm string,
    but it has a very high pitch for a 0.69mm string).


    Shock Absorption: ZM67Ti > ZM62 > ZM65


    Tension Retention: ZM62 > ZM65 > ZM67Ti (As the 67Ti is the thickest string but it is one of the best by far for a 0.69mm string).


    String Stiffness: ZM65 > ZM67Ti > ZM62

    Overall Feel: ZM62 > ZM67Ti > ZM65

    These are all my own personal feedback and opinions, it may vary from yours as each of us have a personal preference to how our strings perform.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •