Hey, so pretty much what do you people prefer? Mainly for singles, i want to know which one most people prefer and which plays better for you, thanks! Ps: Please dont give ambiguous answers to my relatively ambiguous question, thanks .
For me I personally would probably Prefer a 2U because, it trains your wrist it's heavier then 3U. You also generate more power from a 2U if you're use to them, ask your friends to let you try them or something
Oh yeah if you're not used to 2U Don't bother it will slow you down on the court , it will give you more power though, 3U if you're used to it I guess it's all personal preference
i only hv 3u.ive tried both 2u n 3u n for me,it both doesnt suit me for single match.it is still too lighti usually use it for doubles as i prefered voltric or arc series for single
Regardless 2U or 3U, IMO the NS9900 is hard to handle for singles. If you really want to stick with the idea to get a NS9900, I would go for the 3U. 2U will slow you a bit down, especially if you play a game in doubles with heavy smashers. I would prefer an Arc 10 or 11 for singles over the NS9900, but that are only my two cents.
hmm thanks all read all comments, yeah arc 10 is my go to along with arc z, at the moment but heard things about ns9900, still looking for other opinions - thanks.
Wouldn't recommend the arc z , the frame is smaller also timing is different as well I think you would be better for the arc 10
You might want to hold on for the Nanoray Z-Speed. It's bloody expensive, but it appears to be an NS9900 with loads more tech jammed in. Can be had in 3U or 2U, and I suspect the 2U will handle better than expected because of the fast head.
hmm yes i think i will hold off for z-speed since the arc 10 seems to be good enough for now cheers all.